How Do GR Equations of Motion Describe Singularities in 4D Space-Time?

In summary: If x(t)=c_1,\,\tau(t)=c_2 then the equations are satisfied. If x(t)\neq 0,\,\tau(t) \neq c_2 then from the 1st equation we have\frac{\tau''}{\tau'}=\frac{x'}{x}\Rightarrow x=C\,\tau'\,and from the 2nd equation we have\tau'\,\tau'''-\frac{1}{2}\,(\tau'')^2+\frac{m^2}{2\,C^4}=0 \quad \text
  • #1
Mentz114
5,432
292
These are the EOMs for a 4D space-time that has a plane singularity at x=0. They are simpler than most, but as I've confessed before, I need help with even the simplest DE's. This is not a home-work question.

[tex]x\frac{d^2\tau}{dt^2} - \frac{d\tau}{dt}\frac{dx}{dt} = 0[/tex]

[tex]x^3\frac{d^2x}{dt^2} + \frac{m^2}{2}(\frac{d\tau}{dt})^2 - \frac{x^2}{2}(\frac{dx}{dt})^2 = 0[/tex]

Any solutions gratefully received and will be acknowledged.

M
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If [itex]x(t)=c_1,\,\tau(t)=c_2[/itex] then the equations are satisfied.
If [itex]x(t)\neq 0,\,\tau(t) \neq c_2[/itex] then from the 1st equation we have

[tex]\frac{\tau''}{\tau'}=\frac{x'}{x}\Rightarrow x=C\,\tau'[/tex]

Plugging this result to the 2nd equation we have

[tex]\tau'\,(2\,C^4\,\tau'\,\tau'''-C^4\,(\tau'')^2+m^2)=0\Rightarrow \tau'\,\tau'''-\frac{1}{2}\,(\tau'')^2+\frac{m^2}{2\,C^4}=0 \quad \text{since} \quad \tau'\neq 0[/tex]

Now set [itex]\tau'=\frac{m}{C^2}\,y[/itex], thus

[tex]y\,y''-\frac{1}{2}\,y'^2+\frac{1}{2}=0 \quad (\ast)[/tex]

With the substitution
[tex]y(t) \rightarrow \theta,\,t\rightarrow u(\theta),\,y'(t) \rightarrow \frac{1}{u'(\theta)},\, y''(t) \rightarrow -\frac{u''(\theta)}{u'(\theta)^3}[/tex]
makes the last equation

[tex]\frac{u''(\theta)}{u'(\theta)\,(u'(\theta)^2-1)}=\frac{1}{2\,\theta}[/tex]

which is a 1st order separable ODE.
Thus from the last one we can find [itex]u(\theta)[/itex] and from [itex](\ast), y(t)[/itex] and finally [itex]\tau(t)[/itex]
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Thanks again, RainbowChild. Unfortunately what you've left looks just as difficult as the original to me and I wouldn't know where to begin to solve it.

I'll go and look up 'separable'.

[later]
So, I need to write the last equation the form

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = h(x)g(y)[/tex]

but I don't understand your last equation, are the primes still differentiation wrt t ?

the nearest I can get is this

[tex]\frac{dU}{dt} = \frac{1}{\theta}U(U^2-1)[/tex]

I'm sorry, I'm at sea here.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I'm sorry, I'm at sea here.

Ok, let me throw you a life jacket! :smile:

For

[tex]\frac{u''(\theta)}{u'(\theta)\,(u'(\theta)^2-1)}=\frac{1}{2\,\theta}[/tex]

let [itex]u'(\theta)=z(\theta)[/itex] thus

[tex]\frac{z'(\theta)}{z(\theta)\,(z(\theta)^2-1)}=\frac{1}{2\,\theta}\Rightarrow \int \frac{d\,z}{z\,(z^2-1)}=\int \frac{d\,\theta}{2\,\theta} \Rightarrow \ln\frac{z^2-1}{z^2}=\ln\theta+C_1 \Rightarrow[/tex]

[tex]z(\theta)=\pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-C_1\,\theta}}\Rightarrow u'(\theta)=\pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-C_1\,\theta}}\Rightarrow u(\theta)=\pm \frac{2}{C_1}\,\sqrt{1-C_1\,\theta}-C_2[/tex]

which yields to

[tex]t=\pm \frac{2}{C_1}\,\sqrt{1-C_1\,y(t)}-C_2\Rightarrow y(t)=-\frac{1}{4\,C_1}\,\left((t+C_2)^2\,C_1^2-4\right)[/tex]

Now use [itex]\tau'=\frac{m}{C^2}\,y[/itex], in order to calculate [itex]\tau(t)[/itex]

I hope that clears up things! :smile:
 
  • #5
That helps a lot, thanks. My head is above water.

M
 

FAQ: How Do GR Equations of Motion Describe Singularities in 4D Space-Time?

What are the GR equations of motion?

The GR equations of motion refer to the Einstein field equations, which are a set of ten non-linear partial differential equations that describe the fundamental interactions of gravity as a consequence of the curvature of space-time.

What is the significance of the GR equations of motion?

The GR equations of motion are significant because they provide a mathematical framework for understanding the behavior of large-scale systems, such as galaxies and the universe as a whole, which cannot be explained by Newton's laws of motion.

How do the GR equations of motion differ from Newton's laws of motion?

The GR equations of motion differ from Newton's laws of motion in that they take into account the curvature of space-time, whereas Newton's laws only apply in flat, Euclidean space. Additionally, the GR equations are non-linear, meaning that the effects of gravity are not directly proportional to the mass of an object.

Are the GR equations of motion proven to be accurate?

The GR equations of motion have been extensively tested and validated through various experiments and observations, such as the bending of light by massive objects and the gravitational redshift of light. However, they are still considered a theory and may be refined or replaced in the future.

How are the GR equations of motion used in practical applications?

The GR equations of motion have practical applications in various fields, including astrophysics, cosmology, and space exploration. They are used to make predictions about the behavior of massive objects and the structure of the universe, and have also been utilized in technologies such as GPS systems and gravitational wave detectors.

Back
Top