How to compute the integral of r(t) in three dimensions?

In summary, the conversation discusses the computation of an integral from 0 to 2pi of a vector r(t) = <cos(t), 2t, sin(t)>. The individual terms of r(t) are integrated and evaluated from 0 to 2pi, resulting in a vector with components <0, 4pi^2, -1>. There is a question about whether to take the magnitude of this vector, and a suggestion that the integral may actually be for the arc length of the space curve parametrized by r(t). Further context is needed to determine the specific type of integral being requested.
  • #1
RJLiberator
Gold Member
1,095
63

Homework Statement


r(t) = <cos(t), 2t, sin(t)> from 0 to 2pi (included).
Compute the integral from 0 to 2pi of r(t).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
We haven't learned this in class yet, so I am getting a head. My idea is to simply put r(t) in and integrate term by term so that the final answer is
sin(t), t^2, -cos(t) and evaluate it from 0 to 2pi which gets
<0, 4pi^2, -1> - < 0, 0, -1>
which results in
<0, 4pi^2, 0>

And then I take the magnitude? Eh, answer should not be a vector I assume since this is the area of the space.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Looks correct apart from the third component. Not the most typical integral with multiple dimensions, but why not... if r(t) would be a velocity, you would now have the displacement, for example.
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
  • #3
RJLiberator said:

Homework Statement


r(t) = <cos(t), 2t, sin(t)> from 0 to 2pi (included).
Compute the integral from 0 to 2pi of r(t).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
We haven't learned this in class yet, so I am getting a head. My idea is to simply put r(t) in and integrate term by term so that the final answer is
sin(t), t^2, -cos(t) and evaluate it from 0 to 2pi which gets
<0, 4pi^2, -1> - < 0, 0, -1>
which results in
<0, 4pi^2, -2>

And then I take the magnitude? Eh, answer should not be a vector I assume since this is the area of the space.

A vector result is fine. If you were integrating an acceleration vector over time, for example, your result would be a change in velocity vector v(2Pi) - v(0).
Since seem to not want a vector, and r(t) is usually reserved notation for a position vector, perhaps you actually want the line integral that computes the arc length of the space curve parametrized by r(t). In that case, the idea is to partition the interval [0, 2Pi], and take the length of one tangent vector to the curve |r'(t)| for each interval, and sum them to approximate the length of the curve. The Riemann integral is formed by taking the least upper bound of all such sums (or the limit as the maximum width of each partition approaches 0). As the interval lengths get smaller, the sum of the lengths of the tangent vectors should more closely approximate the curve, as long as the curve is well-behaved. This gives the integral form [tex]\int_0^{2\pi} ||r'(t)|| \, dt.[/tex] This is the integral that you will want to evaluate, but of course you must first find the scalar function ||r'(t)|| to integrate.
Without further context, I cannot say which of these your book is requesting you do.
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
  • #4
RJLiberator said:

Homework Statement


r(t) = <cos(t), 2t, sin(t)> from 0 to 2pi (included).
Compute the integral from 0 to 2pi of r(t).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
We haven't learned this in class yet, so I am getting a head. My idea is to simply put r(t) in and integrate term by term so that the final answer is
sin(t), t^2, -cos(t) and evaluate it from 0 to 2pi which gets
<0, 4pi^2, -1> - < 0, 0, -1>
which results in
<0, 4pi^2, -2>

And then I take the magnitude? Eh, answer should not be a vector I assume since this is the area of the space.

The answer to what shouldn't be a vector? You haven't told us what problem you are purportedly working. Given that you now wonder if you should take the magnitude, I'm guessing that the integral you are working is likely not appropriate for whatever problem you are trying to solve. State the original problem.
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
  • #5
LCKurtz said:
The answer to what shouldn't be a vector? You haven't told us what problem you are purportedly working. Given that you now wonder if you should take the magnitude, I'm guessing that the integral you are working is likely not appropriate for whatever problem you are trying to solve. State the original problem.
This is all the information I'm given:
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-01-28 at 6.55.35 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-01-28 at 6.55.35 PM.png
    27.2 KB · Views: 515
  • #6
mfb said:
Looks correct apart from the third component. Not the most typical integral with multiple dimensions, but why not... if r(t) would be a velocity, you would now have the displacement, for example.
I see the minor calculation error and have now fixed it (or it should be fixed :p). Thank you.
 
  • #7
slider142 said:
A vector result is fine. If you were integrating an acceleration vector over time, for example, your result would be a change in velocity vector v(2Pi) - v(0).
Since seem to not want a vector, and r(t) is usually reserved notation for a position vector, perhaps you actually want the line integral that computes the arc length of the space curve parametrized by r(t). In that case, the idea is to partition the interval [0, 2Pi], and take the length of one tangent vector to the curve |r'(t)| for each interval, and sum them to approximate the length of the curve. The Riemann integral is formed by taking the least upper bound of all such sums (or the limit as the maximum width of each partition approaches 0). As the interval lengths get smaller, the sum of the lengths of the tangent vectors should more closely approximate the curve, as long as the curve is well-behaved. This gives the integral form [tex]\int_0^{2\pi} ||r'(t)|| \, dt.[/tex] This is the integral that you will want to evaluate, but of course you must first find the scalar function ||r'(t)|| to integrate.
Without further context, I cannot say which of these your book is requesting you do.

Thank you for this thoughtful reply. I have since posted the original question which does include the unit tangent, however, I am not sure if that is part of what they are asking to integrate.

Your description makes clear sense to me that it can be a vector (acceleration to velocity) or perhaps their asking us to integrate the unit tangent.

Thank you. I await the next reply from someone.
 
  • #8
RJLiberator said:
Thank you for this thoughtful reply. I have since posted the original question which does include the unit tangent, however, I am not sure if that is part of what they are asking to integrate.

Your description makes clear sense to me that it can be a vector (acceleration to velocity) or perhaps their asking us to integrate the unit tangent.

Thank you. I await the next reply from someone.
The integral presented is indeed the integral of a vector quantity with respect to t, which results in another vector quantity, so your original interpretation is the right one. They may just have asked for the unit tangent as a preparatory exercise for later on in the text.
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
  • #9
Thank you.
That does make sense to me now due to your earlier clarification/example.

I appreciate the help.
 

FAQ: How to compute the integral of r(t) in three dimensions?

1. How do I find the limits of integration for the integral of r(t) in three dimensions?

The limits of integration for the integral of r(t) in three dimensions depend on the specific problem or scenario at hand. They are typically determined by the boundaries of the region in three-dimensional space that the function r(t) describes. This can be visualized by drawing the curve or surface described by r(t) and determining the points where it intersects with the coordinate axes.

2. What is the difference between a single integral and a triple integral for r(t) in three dimensions?

A single integral involves finding the area under a curve in two dimensions, while a triple integral involves finding the volume under a surface in three dimensions. To compute the integral of r(t) in three dimensions, you will need to use a triple integral, as it takes into account the full three-dimensional space described by the function.

3. Are there any techniques or methods for simplifying the computation of a triple integral for r(t) in three dimensions?

Yes, there are several techniques that can be used to simplify the computation of a triple integral. These include using symmetry to reduce the number of integrals, changing the order of integration, and transforming the coordinates to a more convenient system. It is important to carefully consider the problem at hand and choose the most appropriate technique for simplification.

4. Can I use technology or software to compute the integral of r(t) in three dimensions?

Yes, there are many software programs and online tools available that can help you compute the integral of r(t) in three dimensions. These tools use numerical methods to approximate the value of the integral, making it a quicker and easier process than doing it by hand. However, it is important to understand the concepts and methods behind the computation in order to effectively use these tools.

5. How do I interpret the result of the integral of r(t) in three dimensions?

The result of the integral of r(t) in three dimensions represents the volume under the surface described by the function r(t) over the specified region. It can also be interpreted as the total displacement or change in position of an object in three-dimensional space over a certain time period. It is important to consider the units of measurement and the context of the problem in order to properly interpret the result.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
814
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top