How to Derive the Inverse of the Sum of Two Operators?

In summary, the conversation is discussing the possibility of solving for the general case of (S+P)^{-1}=S^{-1}-S^{-1}P(S+P)^{-1} and finding the inverse without prior knowledge. There are some errors in the approach suggested and the method of guessing and checking is suggested as a potential solution.
  • #1
poonintoon
17
0
Hi,
I am trying to show that for two operators S and P:
[tex](S+P)^{-1}=S^{-1}-S^{-1}P(S+P)^{-1}[/tex]
I can't get anywhere and searching on google I am not even sure if it is possible
to solve the general case but the question gives no more hints.
Any help appreciated. Thanks.
J.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You'll need to show that [tex](S^{-1}-S^{-1}P(S+P)^{-1})(S+P)=I[/tex]. Id begin by multiplying both sides by S...
 
  • #3
poonintoon said:
Hi,
I am trying to show that for two operators S and P:
[tex](S+P)^{-1}=S^{-1}-S^{-1}P(S+P)^{-1}[/tex]
I can't get anywhere and searching on google I am not even sure if it is possible
to solve the general case but the question gives no more hints.
Any help appreciated. Thanks.
J.
Are you sure about this? The standard way to show that A is the multiplicative inverse of B is to multiply them together to show that you get the identity. But if we multiply both sides, on the right, by S+ P we get
[tex](S+ P)^{-1}(S+ P)= S^{-1}(S+ P)+ S^{-1}P(S+P)^{-1}(S+P)[/tex]
[tex]I= S^{-1}S+ S^{-1}P+ S^{-1}= I+ S^{-1}(P+ S)[/tex]
[tex]S^{-1}(P+S)= 0[/tex]
which is certainly not always true!
 
  • #4
Your approach was correct but you made an error, Halls.

poonintoon: Follow Hall's approach and you will have your proof.
 
  • #5
Actually two errors! I lost a negative sign and a "P"!
 
  • #6
Just a quick curiosity, but how would you find that inverse without having known it in the first place? Surely it wasn't found by simply trying different functions was it?
 
  • #7
Anonymous217 said:
Just a quick curiosity, but how would you find that inverse without having known it in the first place?
It exists. That's all one needs to know. Well, that and the fact that operators form a ring.
 
  • #8
Anonymous217 said:
Just a quick curiosity, but how would you find that inverse without having known it in the first place? Surely it wasn't found by simply trying different functions was it?
Why not? That's a well respected method!
 
  • #9
HallsofIvy said:
Why not? That's a well respected method!
Well, I was hopeful of some type of actual procedure so that it could be applied to more complicated operations, but I guess not.
 
  • #10
The more you guess and check the better you get at it
 

FAQ: How to Derive the Inverse of the Sum of Two Operators?

What is the inverse of the sum of two operators?

The inverse of the sum of two operators is a mathematical operation that reverses the effects of adding two operators together. In other words, it is a way to "undo" the sum of two operators.

How is the inverse of the sum of two operators calculated?

The inverse of the sum of two operators is calculated by first finding the inverse of each individual operator, and then adding those inverse operators together. This can also be written as (A + B)^-1 = A^-1 + B^-1.

Can the inverse of the sum of two operators always be found?

No, the inverse of the sum of two operators can only be found if both individual operators have an inverse. If one or both of the operators do not have an inverse, then the inverse of their sum does not exist.

What is the significance of the inverse of the sum of two operators in physics?

In physics, the inverse of the sum of two operators is used to describe the relationship between two physical quantities. It allows us to determine how the two quantities are related and how they affect each other.

Are there any limitations to using the inverse of the sum of two operators?

Yes, there are limitations to using the inverse of the sum of two operators. One limitation is that it can only be used on linear operators, meaning that the operators must follow the rules of linearity. Additionally, the order in which the operators are added can affect the result of the inverse.

Similar threads

Back
Top