How to Determine Scalar Potential Inside and Outside a Charged Sphere?

In summary: Yes, I should have two constants of integration for the solution to this 2nd order ODE. For inside the sphere, I would use \frac{\rho_{o}}{\epsilon_{o}} as the first constant of integration and for outside the sphere I would use -\frac{a}{r} + c.
  • #1
dsta
9
0

Homework Statement


Use Poisson's equation and Laplace's equation to determine the scalar potential inside and outside a sphere of constant charge density po. Use Coulomb's law to give the limit at very large r, and an argument from symmetry to give the value of E at r=0.


Homework Equations


del2V = - p/epsilono
del2V = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure how to start this just using Poisson's/Laplace's equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is [itex]\nabla^2V[/itex] in spherical coordinates?...Are there any symmetries that allow you to simplify it?
 
  • #3
Hmm okay. I'm not sure what symmetries you would need to consider to simplify [itex]\nabla^2V[/itex] in spherical coordinates. Because the charge density is constant, V does not depend on r inside the sphere...I'm not sure about anything else.
 
  • #4
What makes you think [itex]V[/itex] doesn't depend on [itex]r[/itex]?:confused:

Surely you can say that it doesn't depend on either the azimuthal or polar angles though right?...After all, a test charged placed at any given value of [itex]r[/itex], will "see" the same charge distribution at say [itex]\theta=\phi=\pi/4[/itex] as it would at say [itex]\theta=3\pi[/itex], [itex]\phi=\pi/7[/itex] or any other angle wouldn't it? (Draw a picture to convince yourself of this!)...This type of symmetry is called spherical symmetry.
 
  • #5
Oops sorry, I meant to say that. Okay so using the simplified form of the equation for [itex]\nabla^2V[/itex] in spherical coordinates, and Poisson's equation, I was able to get the equation for V inside the sphere. For outside the sphere, the charge density is 0 obviously, so you have to use Laplace's equation. I tried to do this but I can't anywhere near the form of the equation I'm meant to be getting :frown:
 
  • #6
How about you show me your steps (for both inside and outside) and I'll see if I can spot where you are going wrong...
 
  • #7
Inside the sphere:
[tex]\nabla^2V = \frac{1}{r}[/tex][tex]\frac{d}{dr}(r^2\frac{dV}{dr}) = \frac{\rho_{o}}{\epsilon_{o}}[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow V = - \frac{\rho_{o} r^2}{6\epsilon_{o}}[/tex]

Outside the sphere:
[tex]\nabla^2V = \frac{1}{r}[/tex][tex]\frac{d}{dr}(r^2\frac{dV}{dr}) = 0[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow r^2\frac{dV}{dr} = constant = a[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow V = \frac{-a}{r} + c[/tex]
I'm assuming that you now have to use some sort of boundary conditions...
 
Last edited:
  • #8
dsta said:
Inside the sphere:
[tex]\nabla^2V = \frac{1}{r}[/tex][tex]\frac{d}{dr}(r^2\frac{dV}{dr}) = \frac{\rho_{o}}{\epsilon_{o}}[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow V = - \frac{\rho_{o} r^2}{6\epsilon_{o}}[/tex]

You're missing a minus sign in your first equation (although it looks like that's just a typo, since your answer has the correct sign)...More importantly, shouldn't you have two constants of integration for the solution to this 2nd order ODE?:wink:
 

FAQ: How to Determine Scalar Potential Inside and Outside a Charged Sphere?

What is the difference between Poisson and Laplace's equations?

Poisson's equation is a partial differential equation that describes the distribution of a scalar field in a region, given the values of the field on the boundary of that region. Laplace's equation is a special case of Poisson's equation, where the source term is equal to zero. This means that Laplace's equation describes a scalar field that satisfies a certain set of boundary conditions, but has no source or sink of the field.

What are the applications of Poisson and Laplace's equations?

Poisson and Laplace's equations have a wide range of applications in physics, engineering, and mathematics. They are commonly used to describe the electric potential and gravitational potential in a region, as well as temperature distribution, fluid flow, and diffusion processes. They are also used in image processing, signal analysis, and other fields where the concept of a scalar field is applicable.

How are Poisson and Laplace's equations solved?

There are various methods for solving Poisson and Laplace's equations, depending on the specific problem and boundary conditions. For simple geometries, analytical solutions can be found using techniques such as separation of variables or the method of images. For more complex geometries, numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element, or boundary element methods are often used.

What is the physical significance of the solutions to Poisson and Laplace's equations?

The solutions to Poisson and Laplace's equations represent the distribution of a scalar field in a region, given certain boundary conditions. This scalar field could represent physical quantities such as electric potential, temperature, or fluid flow. The solutions can provide valuable insights into the behavior of these physical systems and can be used to make predictions and analyze experiments.

What are the boundary conditions for Poisson and Laplace's equations?

The boundary conditions for Poisson and Laplace's equations depend on the specific problem being solved. In general, there are two types of boundary conditions: Dirichlet boundary conditions, where the value of the scalar field is specified at the boundary, and Neumann boundary conditions, where the gradient of the scalar field is specified at the boundary. Other types of boundary conditions, such as mixed or periodic boundary conditions, can also be used depending on the problem.

Back
Top