How to Prove 1+2n ≤ 3^n for All Positive Integers by Induction?

But just a hint:When n = 1,A^1 = P D^1 P^(-1) = P P^(-1) = I (where I is the identity matrix)Assuming the statement holds for n, prove that it also holds for n+1.
  • #1
zeion
466
1

Homework Statement



Show that the statement holds for all positive integers n.

1+2n <= 3^n


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



n = 1
1+2 <= 3

n = k
1+2k <= 3^k

n = (k+1)

1+2(k+1) <= 3^(k+1)
2k + 3 <= (3)(3^k)

Not sure what to do now

2k/3 + 1 <= 3^k
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
zeion said:

Homework Statement



Show that the statement holds for all positive integers n.

1+2n <= 3^n


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



n = 1
1+2 <= 3

n = k
1+2k <= 3^k

n = (k+1)

1+2(k+1) <= 3^(k+1)
2k + 3 <= (3)(3^k)

Not sure what to do now

2k/3 + 1 <= 3^k

Hint:

Use your Induction Hypothesis (i.e, 1 + 2k <= 3k) to move on.

Remember that, you are trying to prove: 1 + 2(k+1) <= 3k + 1.

So: 1 + 2(k+1) = 2k + 3 = 2k + 1 + 2 <= ...
 
  • #3
Assume:
3^k >= 1 + 2(k+1)
Then:
3^(k+1) = 3^k(3) >= (1 + 2(k+1))(3)

Then to proof it (1 + 2(k+1))(3) >= 1 + 2(k+1)

(1 + 2k + 2)(3) >= 1 + 2k + 2
6k + 9 >= 2k + 3
3(2k + 3) >= 2k + 3

Is that right??
 
  • #4
zeion said:
Assume:
3^k >= 1 + 2(k+1)

No, your assumption is incorrect. :( What you should have assumed is:

3k >= 1 + 2k

NOT

3k >= 1 + 2(k + 1)

Let's try to do it again then.
 
  • #5
Assume:
3k >= 1 + 2k

Then:
3k+1 = 3k(3) >= (3)(1+2k)

Proof that:
3(1+2k) >= (1 + 2k)
 
  • #6
zeion said:
Assume:
3k >= 1 + 2k

Then:
3k+1 = 3k(3) >= (3)(1+2k)

Proof that:
3(1+2k) >= (1 + 2k)

Yup. And what's left is just to prove that 3(1+2k) >= (1 + 2k). Note that we already have k >= 0.

How can you go about proving the above inequality?
 
  • #7
If k >= 0 then (1 + 2k) is > 0.
Let a be (1 + 2k)
3a >= a
 
  • #8
can someone pls help to proof the following by induction:
A^n=P D^n P^(-1)
 
  • #9
You might want to start your own thread.
 

FAQ: How to Prove 1+2n ≤ 3^n for All Positive Integers by Induction?

What is proof by induction?

Proof by induction is a mathematical method used to prove a statement or proposition for all natural numbers. It involves two steps: a base case, where the statement is shown to be true for the first natural number, and an inductive step, where it is shown that if the statement is true for one natural number, it is also true for the next natural number.

When should I use proof by induction?

Proof by induction is typically used when trying to prove statements about natural numbers, such as properties of sequences or series. It is also commonly used in discrete mathematics and computer science to prove the correctness of algorithms or data structures.

What are the key components of a proof by induction?

The key components of a proof by induction are the base case, the inductive hypothesis, and the inductive step. The base case is the initial value for which the statement is shown to be true. The inductive hypothesis is the assumption that the statement is true for a particular natural number. The inductive step then uses the inductive hypothesis to prove that the statement is also true for the next natural number.

What are the limitations of proof by induction?

Proof by induction can only be used to prove statements that are true for all natural numbers. It cannot be used to prove statements about real numbers, as there are infinitely many real numbers between any two natural numbers. Additionally, it may not be the most efficient method for proving certain statements, and alternative methods may be more suitable.

Can proof by induction be used to prove statements in other fields of mathematics?

Yes, proof by induction is not limited to just the field of natural numbers and can be used in other areas of mathematics such as set theory, graph theory, and number theory. However, the structure of the proof may be slightly different depending on the specific field and the type of statement being proven.

Back
Top