I don't understand the derivation of the wave equation

In summary: Torque determines rotational acceleration, not linear acceleration. In summary, the net force along the y-axis, represented by T sin(θ2) - T sin(θ1), is equal to the mass of the string times its acceleration along the y-axis, as dictated by Newton's Second Law. This holds true even if there is a torque present, as torque affects rotational acceleration, not linear acceleration.
  • #1
Clara Chung
304
14
1222.png

If there is a net force along the y-axis, i.e. T sin(θ2) - T sin(θ1)
Why is it equals to ma, where a is the acceleration of the piece of string along the y-axis? Shouldn't there be a torque so the piece of string rotates?
Sorry for sounding stupid.
 

Attachments

  • 1222.png
    1222.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 1,022
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Clara Chung said:
Shouldn't there be a torque so the piece of string rotates?
I take it that you think of resultant force as a torque, because the two forces appear to act as a couple. By definition A couple is a pair of forces, equal in magnitude, oppositely directed, and displaced by perpendicular distance or moment. In this case the forces are equal(considering the infinitesimal element), are displaced by (almost)perpendicular distance but not oppositely directed. Hence the resultant is a force along some particular direction.

Now the question is: what is this resultant force? And that is given by:
Clara Chung said:
there is a net force along the y-axis, i.e. T sin(θ2) - T sin(θ1)
I hope that you understand why there's no net force along the x axis.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
  • #3
The angle is supposed to be very small so that the sine of the angle is equal to dy/dx. The force balance is in the y direction, and includes the translational inertia. The bending rigidity of the string is considered negligible. What do you estimate for the torque on each section of string?
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
  • #4
Chestermiller said:
The angle is supposed to be very small so that the sine of the angle is equal to dy/dx. The force balance is in the y direction, and includes the translational inertia. The bending rigidity of the string is considered negligible. What do you estimate for the torque on each section of string?
I don't know how to estimate the torque. I just think that there is a torque by intuition.
 
  • #5
Clara Chung said:
I don't know how to estimate the torque. I just think that there is a torque by intuition.
The string is not a rigid body, so it doesn’t have to satisfy a moment balance.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung and phoenix95
  • #6
Chestermiller said:
The string is not a rigid body, so it doesn’t have to satisfy a moment balance.
Besides, for any short section of string, if you take moments of the tensile forces st its ends about its center of mass, they cancel.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
  • #7
Clara Chung said:
View attachment 218472
Why is it equals to ma, where a is the acceleration of the piece of string along the y-axis?
What do mean by "it"? What do you want "it" to be besides the acceleration of the center of mass of the piece of string along the y-axis? Are you asking about the acceleration vector for the center of mass of the piece of string? - and asking why its only nonzero component is along the y-axis?
 
  • #8
Clara Chung said:
If there is a net force along the y-axis, i.e. T sin(θ2) - T sin(θ1)
Why is it equals to ma, where a is the acceleration of the piece of string along the y-axis?

That follows directly from Newton's Second Law, ##\vec{F}_{net}=m \vec{a}##. The vertical components of those vectors must also be equal: ##F_{net,y}=ma_y##.

Shouldn't there be a torque so the piece of string rotates?

Whether there is or not has no bearing on the above.
 

FAQ: I don't understand the derivation of the wave equation

What is the wave equation?

The wave equation is a mathematical equation that describes the behavior and propagation of waves. It is a second-order partial differential equation that relates the second derivative of a wave function to its spatial and temporal derivatives.

Why is the wave equation important?

The wave equation is important because it is a fundamental equation in physics and is used to describe various phenomena such as sound, light, and electromagnetic waves. It is also used in engineering and other sciences to model and predict the behavior of waves in different systems.

How is the wave equation derived?

The wave equation is derived from the principles of conservation of energy and momentum. It is also derived from the Maxwell's equations, which describe the behavior of electromagnetic waves. The derivation involves applying mathematical techniques such as differential calculus and Fourier analysis.

What are the assumptions made in the derivation of the wave equation?

Some of the assumptions made in the derivation of the wave equation include the medium being linear, homogeneous, and isotropic. This means that the medium has a constant density, elasticity, and no preferred direction of propagation. Other assumptions may vary depending on the specific application of the wave equation.

Can the wave equation be applied to all types of waves?

The wave equation can be applied to most types of waves, such as mechanical, electromagnetic, and acoustic waves. However, there may be some cases where the wave equation may not be applicable, such as for non-linear systems or waves in non-homogeneous media. In such cases, modified versions of the wave equation may be used.

Back
Top