Incredibly small equation but cant find answer

  • Thread starter Haxx0rm4ster
  • Start date
In summary: Well, for cubic and quartic equations there sort of is, but they're rather nastier than the quadratic equation. And if the degree of the polynomial is 5 or larger, you're pretty much stuck with numerical approximation in general.
  • #1
Haxx0rm4ster
37
0
cuberoot(x) = x-6

I know the answer is 8, but I don't know how to solve it... how embarrassing.
Taking Ap chem and not knowing how to find this out. I am just in Algebra 2.
:cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Haxx0rm4ster said:
cuberoot(x) = x-6

I know the answer is 8, but I don't know how to solve it... how embarrassing.
Taking Ap chem and not knowing how to find this out. I am just in Algebra 2.
:cry:

Cube both sides:
[tex]x=(x-6)^3=x^3-18x^2+108x-216[/tex]

So
[tex]0=x^3-18x^2+107x-216[/tex].

I think the best, low level, way to try to solve this is to use the "Rational Roots Test." It's a simple enough method once you've learned it. Basically, take any polynomial equation of the form [tex]0=ax^n+bx^{n-1}+...+cx+d[/tex]. Look at the leading coefficient (a), in this case it's 1. Factor 1 into all possibilities: [tex]1= \pm 1[/tex]. Next look at the constant term (d) and factor that: [tex]-216=\pm (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, ...)[/tex]. If any rational roots to the equation exist, they must be of the form: x = (factor of constant term)/(factor of leading term). So make your list and try all the possibilities. If one (or more) works, then you've found a solution. If none of them do then the roots are not rational numbers and you need a more advanced method.

-Dan
 
  • #3
[tex]0=x^3-18x^2+107x-216[/tex]
tahts pretty much where i got to...except i moved 216 to the other side, took out one X from the right side, but noticed the equation was nonfactorable.


well... from the way you said it, it could have just been easier to plug in numbers into X to find a solution... which is what i did to find that X=8.
Obviously, there must be an equation to do this.


If you know how to do this, could you solve it for me? I mean its not a homework it was just a classwork that we turned into a substitute teacher... but no one knew how to do it.

I just want to learn step by step.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Once you get the first root, just use "long division" :
divide the " x^3 - 18x^2 +107x -216 " , treating the x-powers like place value,
by the " x-8 " root . I get " x^2 - 10x + 27 " .
So, now what are the other roots?
They're not integers, since -3 + -9 is not -10 ... (-3*-9 = 27) but not far off.
 
  • #5
Haxx0rm4ster said:
[tex]0=x^3-18x^2+107x-216[/tex]
tahts pretty much where i got to...except i moved 216 to the other side, took out one X from the right side, but noticed the equation was nonfactorable.


well... from the way you said it, it could have just been easier to plug in numbers into X to find a solution... which is what i did to find that X=8.
Obviously, there must be an equation to do this.


If you know how to do this, could you solve it for me? I mean its not a homework it was just a classwork that we turned into a substitute teacher... but no one knew how to do it.

I just want to learn step by step.

Actually, there isn't an equation. Well, for cubic and quartic equations there sort of is, but they're rather nastier than the quadratic equation. And if the degree of the polynomial is 5 or larger, you're pretty much stuck with numerical approximation in general.

If you're feeling up to some algebra, look up "Cardano's Method" for solving cubic equations. There's a ton of algebra involved, and the solutions usually need quite a bit of tidying before they simplify for even simple problems, but the process isn't that hard to understand.

-Dan
 

FAQ: Incredibly small equation but cant find answer

What is an incredibly small equation?

An incredibly small equation is a mathematical expression that contains variables, numbers, and operations, but is smaller in size compared to other equations. It may also refer to an equation that represents a very tiny value or quantity.

Why can't I find an answer to my incredibly small equation?

There could be several reasons why you are unable to find an answer to your incredibly small equation. It could be due to the complexity of the equation, lack of information or data, or it may be an unsolvable equation.

Can incredibly small equations be solved?

Yes, incredibly small equations can be solved. However, their solutions may not always be easily accessible or may require advanced mathematical techniques to solve.

How are incredibly small equations used in science?

Incredibly small equations are used in various scientific fields, including physics, chemistry, and biology. They are used to represent relationships between different variables, make predictions, and solve problems in these disciplines.

Is there a specific type of equation that is considered incredibly small?

No, there is no specific type of equation that is considered incredibly small. Any equation can be incredibly small if it contains fewer variables or is of a smaller size compared to other equations.

Back
Top