Interaction of e.m radiation: from classical to quantum behavior

In summary: R_B}}$$For a visible light, the energy of the photons is around ##h/\lambda##, so the interaction between the waves and the electrons is classical. If we irradiate the electrons with a coherent X-ray beam (I think it can be achieved in a synchrotron, but not sure), could we get an ordered oscillation instead of Compton effects?It is theoretically possible, but it has not been demonstrated yet. If we have a visible or radio-frequency radiation very dim so that the photon flux is very low, would the interactions be "compton-like"?There is no definitive answer to this question since it depends on the
  • #1
Gruxg
41
2
(I am not sure what is the best subforum for this doubt, please move the thread if necessary)

When we study the interaction of the electromagnetic waves with a charged particle (let's say an electron) we can find two totally different approaches in the literature. If we are talking about light or lower frequency radiation, a classical view is often employed and it is said that the electron oscillates due to the electric field of the wave. However, for higher frequencies (gamma and X-rays) the e.m. field is viewed as particles that hit the electron (the Compton effect). Since both radiations are of the same nature and they differ only in the frequency, and all the intermediate frequencies are possible, it is reasonable to think that there should exist a smooth transition between the "electric-like" behavior and the "particle-like" behavior, but I have trouble to figure it out. I cannot imagine how it is.

For example, if we irradiate a conducting medium or a plasma with UV light (between visible and X-rays), is the interaction with the charges best described by the classical approach or by Compton scattering?. Are both effects present as different, simultaneous phenomena or there is something in between?

If we could irradiate the electrons with a coherent X-ray beam (I think it can be achieved in a synchrotron, but not sure), could we get an ordered oscillation instead of Compton effects?

If we have a visible or radio-frequency radiation very dim so that the photon flux is very low, would the interactions be "compton-like"?

Any explanation, reference or link that could help to understand this transition would be most appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I guess my doubt must be too difficult or too general or too stupid...
 
  • #3
Gruxg said:
(I am not sure what is the best subforum for this doubt, please move the thread if necessary)

Your question is certainly not stupid. It might have gotten a faster response in the Quantum Physics subforum.

When we study the interaction of the electromagnetic waves with a charged particle (let's say an electron) we can find two totally different approaches in the literature. If we are talking about light or lower frequency radiation, a classical view is often employed and it is said that the electron oscillates due to the electric field of the wave. However, for higher frequencies (gamma and X-rays) the e.m. field is viewed as particles that hit the electron (the Compton effect). Since both radiations are of the same nature and they differ only in the frequency, and all the intermediate frequencies are possible, it is reasonable to think that there should exist a smooth transition between the "electric-like" behavior and the "particle-like" behavior, but I have trouble to figure it out. I cannot imagine how it is.

The size of quantum effects can typically be estimated by comparing energy scales. In the case of an EM wave interacting with some system, we would compare the energy scale of the EM wave, ##h\nu = h/\lambda## with the typical energy scale of the system.

For a hydrogen atom, the appropriate energy scale is the Rydberg constant ##\alpha^2 m_e c^2/2 \sim 13.6~\mathrm{eV}##, which is equivalent to around ##91~\mathrm{nm}## (extreme UV spectrum). For wavelengths which are very large compared to this scale (IR and longer), the hydrogen atom looks classical. This is because the energy of the corresponding photons are not large enough to excite the electron in the ground state to an excited quantum state. If the H-atom absorbs a low-energy photon, it will just give the entire atom some momentum: for a gas of atoms, this means that we're just heating the sample. Classical physics is a good approximation to describe a hydrogen atom with a small velocity. As we get into the visible spectrum, a single photon has enough energy to cause transitions between excited states of the H-atom and we need quantum mechanics to describe the physics. At even higher energies, we can excite the ground state and for our ##13.6~\mathrm{eV}## photons, we have enough energy to ionize the atom, completely stripping the electron away.

At extremely high energies (the X-ray and gamma frequencies) we have enough energy to excite nuclei of atoms, so again we need quantum mechanics to describe the processes.

For example, if we irradiate a conducting medium or a plasma with UV light (between visible and X-rays), is the interaction with the charges best described by the classical approach or by Compton scattering?. Are both effects present as different, simultaneous phenomena or there is something in between?

The relevant energy scale for free nonrelativistic electrons would be the de Broglie wavelength= ##h/p##. In a plasma, we can approximate this as ##\lambda_B = h/(m v_T)##, where ##v_T## is the thermal velocity

$$v_T = \sqrt{\frac{k_B T}{m}}.$$

So interactions of photons with wavelengths much longer than ##\lambda_B## are classical. At higher energies, quantum effects would become relevant.


If we could irradiate the electrons with a coherent X-ray beam (I think it can be achieved in a synchrotron, but not sure), could we get an ordered oscillation instead of Compton effects?

If we have a visible or radio-frequency radiation very dim so that the photon flux is very low, would the interactions be "compton-like"?

Any explanation, reference or link that could help to understand this transition would be most appreciated!

I haven't found a particularly good link that would further explain the use of energy scales to estimate quantum vs classical behavior, but it's certainly something that is discussed in every QM text. Obviously the right place to look is the same place where they discuss the de Broglie wavelength and the physical significance.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #4
Thanks fzero. You have explained how to find out in which cases the classical approach is a good approximation and in with cases the "particle like" behavior is dominant, depending if the photon energy is much higher or much lower than a characteristic energy of the system. However, what I attemp to understand is what happens in the transition zone, because I assume there is not a sharp change at a given energy (well, if we have an atom with its quantized energy levels there may be, but I was thinking in free electrons). How one kind of behevior arises from the other.

Perhaps the answer to the last two questions could bring some light to the matter.
 

Related to Interaction of e.m radiation: from classical to quantum behavior

1. What is electromagnetic radiation?

Electromagnetic radiation refers to the energy that is emitted and propagated through space in the form of electromagnetic waves. This includes visible light, radio waves, microwaves, X-rays, and gamma rays.

2. How does classical behavior differ from quantum behavior in the interaction of electromagnetic radiation?

In classical behavior, electromagnetic radiation is described as continuous waves, whereas in quantum behavior, it is described as discrete packets of energy called photons. Classical behavior also follows the laws of classical physics, while quantum behavior follows the laws of quantum mechanics.

3. What is the electromagnetic spectrum?

The electromagnetic spectrum is the range of all types of electromagnetic radiation. It includes all wavelengths, from long radio waves to short gamma rays, and is categorized into different regions based on their wavelengths and frequencies.

4. How does the interaction of electromagnetic radiation play a role in everyday life?

The interaction of electromagnetic radiation is essential in many everyday technologies and applications, such as communication systems, medical imaging, and energy production. It also plays a crucial role in the natural world, including photosynthesis and the Earth's climate.

5. How has our understanding of the interaction of electromagnetic radiation evolved over time?

Our understanding of the interaction of electromagnetic radiation has evolved significantly over time, from the classical theories of Maxwell and Newton to the quantum theories of Planck and Einstein. Each discovery and advancement has contributed to our current understanding and continues to be an active area of research in the field of physics.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top