Inverse Function: Solving for y in 2(x-3)/y = 3

  • Thread starter Nelo
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Inverse
So it should be:y=\frac{3}{2x}+\frac{3}{1}y=\frac{3+6x}{2x}y=\frac{6x+3}{2x}Which is the same as my answer.
  • #1
Nelo
215
0

Homework Statement




y = 3
___
2(x-3)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ive tried several times, I can't get the steps down. They say use reverse bedmass, and I don't understand.

Here's what i did.

y= 3/2(x-3)

x= 3/2(y-3)

x= 3/2y-6
x+6=3/2y

x+6
___ = 3
2

Which is already wrong, as you can see. Can someone please tell me the step so i can stop being stuck on this for 2 hours? =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
"x= 3/2y-6"

You were correct up to here. If it helps, write parenthesis in the denominator.

x=[itex]\frac{3}{(2y-6)}[/itex]

What you did was just canceled out the 6 in the denominator which you cannot do. Our objective is to get y by itself. Do that by multiplying 2y-6 to both sides. That should get rid of the fraction and leave you with.

x(2y-6)=3

Try getting y by itself from here.
 
  • #3
Ok...

x = 3 / (2y-6)

x(2y-6) 3
_______ = _____
(2y-6) (2y-6)

2xy-6x 3
______=_____
2y-6 2y-6

Pretty sure I am already wrong. .. .
 
  • #4
When I mean multiply both sides you don't do it like this:

[itex]\frac{2y-6}{2y-6}[/itex] x=[itex]\frac{3}{2y-6}[/itex][itex]\frac{2y-6}{2y-6}[/itex]

[itex]\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow[/itex] That is a no no.

You do it like this:

x([itex]\frac{2y-6}{1}[/itex])=[itex]\frac{3}{2y-6}[/itex]([itex]\frac{2y-6}{1}[/itex])

Notice how the (2y-6) in the right side would cancel out. That would leave us with this.

x(2y-6)=3

Remember this: If you do anything to one side, you MUST do it to the other side of the equation.
 
  • #5
So... the x still factors into 2y-6 on both sides..? your eq would give 2xy-6x/x on the left side..
 
  • #6
What do you mean "factors on both sides)? My equation would not leave you with a fraction (though the answer would be a fraction). Try distributing the x term to (2y-6). Then just solve for y.

*Update: I see what you did. No that is wrong. Remember your algebraic properties:

a*[itex]\frac{b}{c}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{ab}{c}[/itex]
 
  • #7
So, i did it like this..


2x(y-3) = 3

2x*y -6x =3

2x*y = 6x+3

y= 6x+3 /2x

y= 3x +3/2x

The answer is 2/3x +3 , however. Why is the x on the bottom?
 
  • #8
Starting from here:
"2xy = 6x+3"

We would divide 2x to get y by itself.

[itex]\frac{2xy}{2x}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{6x+3}{2x}[/itex]

I see you split the fraction on the right side to divide 6x/2x, however you forgot to cancel out the x. However you cannot divide 3/(2x), so that is why 2x is in the denominator. The answer would look like this.

y=[itex]\frac{3}{2x}[/itex]+3


I do not see how the right answer is: "2/3x +3" (assuming this is (2/(3x))+3) the 3 is supposed to be in the numerator and 2x is supposed to be in the denominator.
 

FAQ: Inverse Function: Solving for y in 2(x-3)/y = 3

What is an inverse function?

An inverse function is a function that "undoes" the action of another function. In other words, if we have a function f(x) that maps a set of inputs to a set of outputs, the inverse function f^-1(y) will map those outputs back to the original inputs.

How do I solve for y in an inverse function?

To solve for y in an inverse function, we use the process of "isolating" y on one side of the equation. In the given equation, we can do this by first multiplying both sides by y to get rid of the denominator, then rearranging the terms to get y by itself on one side.

What is the purpose of solving for y in an inverse function?

Solving for y in an inverse function allows us to find the inverse function itself. This is useful in many applications, such as finding the input needed to produce a desired output, or verifying the relationship between two variables.

Are there any special rules for solving for y in an inverse function?

Yes, there are a few special rules to keep in mind when solving for y in an inverse function. These include taking the reciprocal of both sides, switching the positions of x and y, and using the inverse operation of any other operations present in the equation.

Can I always solve for y in an inverse function?

In theory, yes. However, in some cases the inverse function may be too complex to solve for y algebraically. In these cases, numerical methods or approximations may be used to find an approximate solution for y.

Back
Top