- #1
Werg22
- 1,431
- 1
How do we investigate reason, when the only tool of investigation we have is reason itself? If we want to test the laws of logic, then we must in the first place reason about them; and we must reason about the outcome of our tests. But then we would have had used the laws of logic in the process, and that will have defeated our goals (or so it seems?).
How do we get out of this paradox? What is the starting point?
How do we get out of this paradox? What is the starting point?