Is it all TIME, and not amplitude?

In summary, the concept of time is not programmed into subatomic particles, but it is a fundamental aspect of the physical universe that affects the behavior of all particles, including photons.
  • #1
Bonge
5
0
I'm just coming to terms with the simple ideas of QED, and I was wondering that if based on these ideas of amplitudes, and let's talk simply (please) about the hands of the stopwatch turning... Can we conclude from that there is some sort of time programmed into all subatomic particles? I mean like we are working out the amplitudes based on the "time" shown on this imaginary stopwatch, but how do we know it was produced/emitted at 12 o'clock. In fact we see in some of Feynman's diagrams that in fact the amplitude in the angle of the stopwatch hand varies based on when the photon was emitted -
so my question is - do photons know what time it is? is this just some more QED weirdness?! Does anything here make any sense to mortal humans? How the heck do the photons know what angle (time on the imaginary stopwatch) to be pointing to when they leave the source?
Is time an inherent part of the physical nature of matter, are photons a creation of time just as much as of quantum excitement? At the same time (pardon the pun) is anything actually changing in the photon (that makes it change in amplitude i.e. rotate around the stopwatch) or is the photon staying exactly the same but all of nature, and all particles and all photons are the same but TIME is a wave that is dictating the NATURE of all these particles?
This is confusing, is there something simple I am missing, or is it really so weird?
Thanks from a layman
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
.No, photons do not "know" what time it is. The concept of the stopwatch is a useful analogy to help explain the behavior of photons, but it is not meant to imply that photons have an inherent sense of time. The behavior of photons is determined by the laws of quantum mechanics, which state that the probability of a photon's interaction with other particles is determined by its wavefunction and the wavefunctions of the particles it interacts with. This wavefunction depends on the energy, momentum, and other properties of the particles involved, but not on the concept of time as we understand it. However, the behavior of matter and energy does change over time, and this is what creates the phenomenon of time. Time is a measure of the changes in the universe, and so it can be said that time is an inherent part of the physical nature of matter.
 

FAQ: Is it all TIME, and not amplitude?

What does "all TIME, not amplitude" mean?

"All TIME, not amplitude" refers to the concept that time, rather than amplitude, is the fundamental aspect of a system or phenomenon. This means that changes or variations in time are more important and have a greater impact than changes in amplitude.

How is time more important than amplitude?

Time is considered more important because it determines the rate and duration of a process or event. Amplitude, on the other hand, only measures the magnitude or strength of a signal at a specific point in time. Time allows us to track and understand the progression and behavior of a system, while amplitude provides a snapshot of its state at a given moment.

Can you provide an example of a system where time is more important than amplitude?

An example of a system where time is more important than amplitude is in the study of earthquakes. While the amplitude, or magnitude, of an earthquake is important in measuring its strength, it is the duration and timing of the seismic activity that allows us to understand its impact and potential for damage.

How does the concept of "all TIME, not amplitude" apply to scientific research?

In scientific research, the concept of "all TIME, not amplitude" can be applied in various ways. For example, it can help researchers understand the dynamics and behavior of a system over time, rather than just at a single point in time. It can also be used to analyze the long-term effects of a process or intervention, rather than just its immediate impact.

Is the concept of "all TIME, not amplitude" universally accepted in the scientific community?

The concept of "all TIME, not amplitude" is a widely debated topic in the scientific community. While some researchers argue that time is indeed the most important aspect of a system, others believe that amplitude still plays a crucial role in understanding and analyzing phenomena. Ultimately, the acceptance of this concept may vary depending on the specific field of study and the research approach being used.

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
885
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top