Is sin(h) equal to 1 when h = 1?

  • Thread starter AdamS
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the value of sin(h)/h when h=1 and how it relates to the value of 1. The participants also mention the limit of sin(h)/h as h approaches zero and provide a link for a proof. They also mention the possibility of misreading the original statement and suggest trying to work with the given information.
  • #1
AdamS
I read that

sin(h)
------- = 1
h


If h = 1 then
my Calc shows that sin(1) = .8414709848
if we then divide that by 1

we get .8414709848

so how is it supposed to be 1?

I put my calc in Radian and Degree mode, neither give the result of 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You have probably misread. It probably said "the limit of sin(h)/h as h tends to zero, is 1". Click http://people.hofstra.edu/faculty/Stefan_Waner/trig/triglim.html for a proof.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
if you read something and you not sure of what youi've read, try working with what youi've got: here you're saying that sin(h)=h which can't be true.l
 

FAQ: Is sin(h) equal to 1 when h = 1?

How is this proven?

1. What is the scientific method and how does it contribute to proving a hypothesis?

The scientific method is a systematic approach used by scientists to answer questions and test theories. It involves making observations, forming a hypothesis, designing and conducting experiments, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. By following this process, scientists are able to prove or disprove their hypotheses.

How is this proven?

2. How do scientists ensure the validity and reliability of their experiments?

To ensure the validity and reliability of their experiments, scientists use controlled conditions and repeat their experiments multiple times. They also use various statistical tools to analyze their data and determine if the results are statistically significant. Additionally, experiments are peer-reviewed by other scientists to ensure accuracy and eliminate bias.

How is this proven?

3. What role do controls play in proving a hypothesis?

Controls are used in experiments to provide a baseline for comparison. By having a control group that is not exposed to the variable being tested, scientists can determine if any changes observed in the experimental group are due to the variable or other factors. This helps to ensure that the results are a direct effect of the variable being tested.

How is this proven?

4. Can one experiment prove a hypothesis definitively?

No, one experiment alone cannot definitively prove a hypothesis. Scientific knowledge is constantly evolving and one experiment may not be enough to draw a conclusion. That is why multiple experiments, with consistent results, are necessary to provide strong evidence for a hypothesis.

How is this proven?

5. Are there any limitations to the scientific method in proving a hypothesis?

Although the scientific method is a rigorous and reliable process, there are some limitations. For example, some phenomena may be difficult to observe or measure, and some experiments may be too expensive or unethical to conduct. Additionally, human error and bias can also impact the results of an experiment. Scientists must carefully consider these limitations and try to minimize their effects in order to prove a hypothesis.

Back
Top