- #1
Oxymoron
- 870
- 0
Question
Let [itex]S = \{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2\,:\,x\in[0,\pi],\,y\in[0,1]\}[/itex]. Deduce whether or not,
[tex]\left\{\sum_{m,n=0}^M a_{m,n}\cos(mx)y^n\,:\,a_{m,n} \in \mathbb{R}\right\}[/tex]
a subset of [itex]C(S,\mathbb{R})[/itex] is dense.
I was thinking no. And this is not a guess.
My reasoning is as follows. S can be thought of as some 'surface' whose projection onto the real plane is bounded by the rectangle [itex][0,\pi] \times [0,1][/itex].
So, I was led to believe this is kind of like a Fourier analysis problem. Can I construct every possible surface, hence making it dense, using my subset. Well, obviously no, because, for example, I cannot approximate [itex]\sin[/itex] using just linear combinations of [itex]\cos[/itex].
However, let's just say that our subset was
[tex]\left\{\sum_{m=0}^M\sum_{n=0}^N\,a_{m,n}x^my^n\,:\,a_{m,n} \in \mathbb{R}\right\}[/tex]
Then I can approximate, by sums, every possible 'surface', or polynomial using the given subset. So I would say that this particular subset IS dense in [itex]C(S,\mathbb{R})[/itex].
Let's change it a little more. Consider the subset
[tex]\left\{\sum_{m=0}^M\sum_{n=0}^N\,a_{m,n}x^{5m}y^{2n}\,:\,a_{m,n} \in \mathbb{R}\right\}[/tex]
In this case, this subset is NOT dense in [itex]C(S,\mathbb{R})[/itex] because some terms are missing, i.e. 5 and 2 are coprime, so some combinations, i.e. [itex]x^4[/itex] can never be made. That is, this polynomial cannot approximate, by sums, every possible surface within the bounded region. Hence not dense.
I know this is pretty complicated. But if anyone has the guts I would appreciate some feedback.
Let [itex]S = \{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2\,:\,x\in[0,\pi],\,y\in[0,1]\}[/itex]. Deduce whether or not,
[tex]\left\{\sum_{m,n=0}^M a_{m,n}\cos(mx)y^n\,:\,a_{m,n} \in \mathbb{R}\right\}[/tex]
a subset of [itex]C(S,\mathbb{R})[/itex] is dense.
I was thinking no. And this is not a guess.
My reasoning is as follows. S can be thought of as some 'surface' whose projection onto the real plane is bounded by the rectangle [itex][0,\pi] \times [0,1][/itex].
So, I was led to believe this is kind of like a Fourier analysis problem. Can I construct every possible surface, hence making it dense, using my subset. Well, obviously no, because, for example, I cannot approximate [itex]\sin[/itex] using just linear combinations of [itex]\cos[/itex].
However, let's just say that our subset was
[tex]\left\{\sum_{m=0}^M\sum_{n=0}^N\,a_{m,n}x^my^n\,:\,a_{m,n} \in \mathbb{R}\right\}[/tex]
Then I can approximate, by sums, every possible 'surface', or polynomial using the given subset. So I would say that this particular subset IS dense in [itex]C(S,\mathbb{R})[/itex].
Let's change it a little more. Consider the subset
[tex]\left\{\sum_{m=0}^M\sum_{n=0}^N\,a_{m,n}x^{5m}y^{2n}\,:\,a_{m,n} \in \mathbb{R}\right\}[/tex]
In this case, this subset is NOT dense in [itex]C(S,\mathbb{R})[/itex] because some terms are missing, i.e. 5 and 2 are coprime, so some combinations, i.e. [itex]x^4[/itex] can never be made. That is, this polynomial cannot approximate, by sums, every possible surface within the bounded region. Hence not dense.
I know this is pretty complicated. But if anyone has the guts I would appreciate some feedback.