Is the US Really Seeking Domination in the Middle East?

  • News
  • Thread starter Tsu
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Head
In summary, the conversation discusses the US's role as a global power and its ambitions in the Middle East and Southwest Asia. There is mention of a draft outlining the US's objective to maintain dominance in the region, as well as evidence that the Bush administration was planning to remove Saddam Hussein from power before the September 11 attacks. The article argues against labeling the US as an empire and mentions the presence of US troops in Germany.
  • #1
Tsu
Gold Member
420
63
"Kerry Hits Nail on Head"

Gosh! I'm just finding interesting stuff all OVER the place! :biggrin:

We have no desire to dominate, no ambitions of empire.
-George W. Bush, State of the Union Address, Jan. 20, 2004

Under the direction of Paul Wolfowitz, a 1992 draft of the Pentagon Defense Planning Guidance on post-Cold War Strategy explained, "We must maintain the mechanism for deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role." The draft went on, "Our overall objective is to remain the predominant outside power in [the Middle East and Southwest Asia] to preserve U.S. and Western access to the region’s oil." The neocons reiterated this policy in the September 2000 document of the Project for the New American Century, Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century.

Bush and his minions began plotting how to remove Saddam Hussein from power as soon as Bush removed his hand from the Bible after Chief William Rehnquist swore him in as President, according to both former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill and former Anti-Terrorism Czar Richard Clarke. This was 8 months before the September 11 attacks - the date the "war on terror" officially began.

Kerry Hits Nail on Head
By Marjorie Cohn
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Monday 04 October 2004

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/100404A.shtml
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The article is rambling and rhetorical, but the gist of it is a misuse of the word "empire." The US still has 70,000 troops in Germany as a result of WWII->Cold War. Germany is certainly not a territory (what the word "empire" really means), and isn't even a "puppet state," which is the new definition being implied here and elsewhere.
 
  • #3



I completely agree with Kerry's statement that the US has no desire to dominate or have ambitions of empire. It's clear that the Bush administration's actions, as outlined in the Defense Planning Guidance and Rebuilding America's Defenses, contradict this claim and show a clear desire for US dominance in the Middle East and access to oil. The fact that these plans were in motion before the September 11 attacks also raises questions about the true motives behind the "war on terror." Kerry is absolutely right in pointing out this discrepancy and it's important for us to acknowledge and address these issues in order to move towards a more just and peaceful foreign policy.
 

FAQ: Is the US Really Seeking Domination in the Middle East?

What does "Kerry Hits Nail on Head" mean?

"Kerry Hits Nail on Head" is an idiomatic expression that means someone has accurately identified or addressed a problem or issue.

Who is Kerry in "Kerry Hits Nail on Head"?

Kerry is not a specific person in this expression. It can refer to anyone who is making a statement or taking action that is accurate and effective in addressing a problem.

Is "Kerry Hits Nail on Head" a common phrase?

Yes, "Kerry Hits Nail on Head" is a commonly used expression in English-speaking countries. It is often used in casual conversation and media to describe someone's accurate assessment or solution to a problem.

What is the origin of "Kerry Hits Nail on Head"?

The origin of "Kerry Hits Nail on Head" is unclear, but it is believed to come from the concept of hitting a nail on the head with a hammer, which requires precision and accuracy. The expression has been used since at least the 1800s with various versions, such as "hit the nail on the head" and "strike the nail on the head."

Can "Kerry Hits Nail on Head" be used in a negative context?

Yes, "Kerry Hits Nail on Head" can be used in both positive and negative contexts. It can be used to praise someone for accurately addressing a problem, or it can be used sarcastically to criticize someone for oversimplifying or overselling a solution.

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
7K
Replies
65
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top