Is This Logarithmic Simplification Correct?

  • Thread starter cscott
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Exponents
In summary: I fixed up my first two answer, but I don't understand why you add a^2 and b^2 to the right side for the third. I think I see how I can do it now, though:(a + b)^2 = 2ab\frac{(a + b)^2}{2} = ab2 log (\frac{a + b}{2}) = log a + log b
  • #1
cscott
782
1
Could someone please check my work?

Write as a single logarithm:

[tex]\frac{1}{4}[2(log_2 x + 3 log_2 y) - 3 log_2 z][/tex]

I got [tex]log_2(\frac{x^2y^6}{z^3})^\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{3}{5}[\frac{1}{2}(log_2 x + 3 log_2 y) - 2(log_2 x - 4 log_2 y)][/tex]

I got [tex]log_2 (\frac{x^\frac{1}{2}y^{1.5}}{x^2} \cdot y^8)^\frac{3}{5}[/tex]

I'd also appreciate some hints on the following:

[tex]a^2 + b^2 = 2ab[/tex]
prove
[tex]log (\frac{a + b}{2} = \frac{1}{2}(log a + log b)[/tex]

The part I really don't get is where the exponents go...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
first part is perfect although you could get rid of the 1/4 power by looking at the third equation I gave you for the second problem

the second could be simplified further by noting that

[tex] \frac{a^m}{a^n} = a^{m-n} [/tex]

[tex] a^m * a^n = a^{m+n} [/tex]

[tex] {(a^m)}^n = a^{mn} [/tex]

for the third, note that

[tex] (a + b)^2 = a^2 +2ab + b^2 [/tex]

can you do the rest?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Work looks fine.


Suppose that
[tex]a^2 + b^2 = 2ab[/tex]
<==>
[tex]a^2 - 2ab + b^2 = 0[/tex]
<==>
[tex](a - b)^2 = 0[/tex]
then what can we say about a and b?
 
  • #4
the above hint will work, but in a kind of backwards way... its easier (and more direct) to come up with an expression for (a+b)/2 and use the properties of logs
 
  • #5
JFo said:
the above hint will work, but in a kind of backwards way... its easier (and more direct) to come up with an expression for (a+b)/2 and use the properties of logs

And by above you're referring to your own? If that is the case, I wouldn't agree with you.
 
  • #6
no I was referring to your hint
 
  • #7
JFo said:
no I was referring to your hint

Ok, but using my hint one don't have to use any properties of logarithms..
 
  • #8
true, but going that route bypasses what I think the excercise is meant to do, considering the context of the first two questions.

but I'll let the OP decide what method to use.
 
  • #9
[tex] a^{2}+b^{2}=2 ab [/tex]

Add [itex] 2ab [/itex] to it:

[tex] (a+b)^{2}=4ab [/tex]

You can get

[tex] \frac{a+b}{2}=\pm (ab)^{\frac{1}{2} [/tex]

Choose the "+" sign in the RHS,so you won't get imaginary numbers.

Daniel.
 
  • #10
yeah...what dextercioby did was what I had in mind
 
  • #11
JFo said:
first part is perfect although you could get rid of the 1/4 power by looking at the third equation I gave you for the second problem

the second could be simplified further by noting that

[tex] \frac{a^m}{a^n} = a^{m-n} [/tex]

[tex] a^m * a^n = a^{m+n} [/tex]

[tex] {(a^m)}^n = a^{mn} [/tex]

for the third, note that

[tex] (a + b)^2 = a^2 +2ab + b^2 [/tex]

can you do the rest?


I fixed up my first two answer, but I don't understand why you add a^2 and b^2 to the right side for the third. I think I see how I can do it now, though:

[tex](a + b)^2 = 2ab[/tex]
[tex]\frac{(a + b)^2}{2} = ab[/tex]
[tex]2 log (\frac{a + b}{2}) = log a + log b[/tex]
[tex]log (\frac{a + b}{2}) = \frac{1}{2}(log a + log b)[/tex]

dextercioby: I see where you're going, but can you explain more how you got the last step?
 
  • #12
By taking sq.root from both sides of the equation ??That's how the "+-" got there.

And your post is completely wrong.

Daniel.
 
  • #13
cscott said:
I fixed up my first two answer, but I don't understand why you add a^2 and b^2 to the right side for the third. I think I see how I can do it now, though:

[tex](a + b)^2 = 2ab[/tex]
[tex]\frac{(a + b)^2}{2} = ab[/tex]
[tex]2 log (\frac{a + b}{2}) = log a + log b[/tex]
[tex]log (\frac{a + b}{2}) = \frac{1}{2}(log a + log b)[/tex]

[tex](a + b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 + 2ab [/tex]

the above equation is true for any 2 real numbers a and b. [to verify, just multiply out (a+b)(a+b)]

They told you that [itex] a^2 + b^2 = 2ab [/itex], substituting this into the first equation you get

[tex](a + b)^2 = 4ab [/tex]

taking the square root of both sides, you get

[tex] (a+b) = 2(ab)^{\frac{1}{2}} [/tex]

(we take the positive root, because the log of a negative number is not defined)

divide both sides by two and

[tex] \frac{a+b}{2} = (ab)^{\frac{1}{2}} [/tex]

take the log of both sides and... (fill in rest)
 

FAQ: Is This Logarithmic Simplification Correct?

Where do the exponents go when simplifying expressions with multiple operations?

When simplifying expressions with multiple operations, the exponents should be applied first before any other operations. This means that you would simplify any exponents first before moving on to multiplication, division, addition, or subtraction.

How do you handle negative exponents when simplifying expressions?

When dealing with negative exponents, you can either change them to positive exponents by moving them to the denominator or use the negative exponent rule which states that any negative exponent can be rewritten as 1 over the base raised to the positive exponent. For example, 2^-3 can be rewritten as 1/2^3 or 1/8.

Can exponents be added or subtracted together?

No, exponents cannot be added or subtracted together unless they have the same base. In order to add or subtract exponents, the bases must be the same and you can then use the rules for exponents to combine them.

How do you simplify expressions with exponents and parentheses?

When simplifying expressions with exponents and parentheses, you should first apply the exponent to the terms inside the parentheses and then simplify any remaining operations. For example, (2x)^3 can be rewritten as 2^3 * x^3, which can then be further simplified to 8x^3.

Do all numbers have an exponent of 1?

Yes, all numbers have an exponent of 1. This can be seen when we write numbers in exponential form, where the exponent is the number of times the base is multiplied by itself. For example, 2 can be written as 2^1, 3 as 3^1, and so on.

Back
Top