Is This Proof Correct for the Area Under a Sinusoidal Graph from 0 to 2π?

  • Thread starter mjerrar
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, the author is discussing with a lot of people at their university about the equation for a sinusoidal wave, and they are not satisfied with the way the equation is written. The author insists that the equation should be written in terms of integrals instead of sums, and they object to the equality sign in the equation. If the author proves their point to the people at the university, it is likely that they will be satisfied.
  • #1
mjerrar
3
0
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/17/4andfinal.jpg/

I ve discussed with a lot of people at my university including a teacher but they equate the above equation inorder to get the area under a graph which is sinusoidal for 0 to pi and a zero funtion for pi to 2pi...

So please give me a proof so that I can show them...i.e. their method is mathematically wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Errr, why would they say that? Did they give any explanation for it?? Maybe you misunderstood what they said??
 
  • #3
The graph was actually of a sinusoidal wave from 0 to pi...and from pi to 2pi it remained zero...making the periodic function for the ac wave...
Now the problem was that they said to find the equivalent dc current...i.e. to find the average value u use this formula to find the area...

integrate Asinxdx from o to 2pi...
whereas I insisted it will be
integrate Asinxdx from 0 to pi...as the sinusoidal graph is only for this interval

and then divide the area by 2pi...

and then they said u can split the limits...i.e.
integrate sinxdx from o to 2pi = integrate sinxdx from o to pi + integrate 0dx from pi to 2pi...

this is where I objected that is equality sign is not correct ...it doesn't satisfy mathematical laws...
am I correct..??
and please if I am...help me ...prove it to them...
 
  • #4
You're right. Writing

[tex]\int_0^{2\pi}\sin(x)dx=\int_0^\pi\sin(x)dx+ \int_\pi^{2\pi}0dx[/tex]

is obviously not correct.

However, if they wrote

[tex]f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l} \sin(x)~\text{if}~0\leq x\leq \pi\\ 0~\text{if}~\pi\leq x\leq 2\pi \end{array}\right.[/tex]

then writing

[tex]\int_0^{2\pi}f(x)dx=\int_0^\pi\sin(x)dx+\int_\pi^{2\pi}0dx[/tex]

is correct.
 
  • #5
thanks alott...micromass...hope this satisfies them...
 

FAQ: Is This Proof Correct for the Area Under a Sinusoidal Graph from 0 to 2π?

What is the importance of providing a proof in science?

In science, providing a proof is crucial because it allows us to validate and verify the accuracy of a hypothesis or theory. It provides evidence to support or refute a claim, and helps to advance our understanding of the natural world.

What is the process of creating a scientific proof?

The process of creating a scientific proof involves conducting experiments, collecting data, and analyzing the results to support a hypothesis. This is then presented in a logical and organized manner, with clear and concise reasoning, to demonstrate the validity of the claim.

Can a single proof be considered as definite and absolute truth?

No, a single proof in science cannot be considered as definite and absolute truth. Science is an ever-evolving field and new evidence can always be discovered that may challenge or modify previously accepted proofs. Therefore, it is important to continue testing and improving upon existing proofs.

What are the characteristics of a strong scientific proof?

A strong scientific proof should be based on reliable and valid data, obtained through well-designed experiments. It should also be reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to obtain similar results when conducting the same experiments. Additionally, a strong proof should be supported by sound reasoning and be free from biases and errors.

Is it necessary to provide a proof for every scientific claim?

Yes, it is necessary to provide a proof for every scientific claim. Without a proof, a claim is merely an assertion and cannot be considered as scientifically valid. Providing a proof ensures that the claim is supported by evidence and can be tested and verified by others.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top