KE Conservation: Calculating Final Velocities

In summary, the conversation revolves around a problem involving a block of mass m colliding with a beam that can rotate about an axis. The problem is to find the final velocity of the block after the collision. The approach suggested involves using the conservation of angular momentum and kinetic energy equations. The final solution requires solving a system of equations for the unknowns, final velocity vf and angular velocity ω.
  • #36
goonking said:
shouldn't the M in I =1/12*M* D^2 be 2m?

so
I =1/12*2m* D^2

?
D is unknown, solve in terms of it. And yes, the mass of the beam is M=2m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
goonking said:
shouldn't the M in I =1/12*M* D^2 be 2m?
ehild said:
D is unknown, solve in terms of it. And yes, the mass of the beam is M=2m
after doing some algebra in the angular momentum section. i get :

10 = (Vf /2) + ( D ω )

seems right so far?

D = (10- (Vf/2)) / ω
 
Last edited:
  • #38
No, I do not think it is right. And you need vf, not D.
 
  • #39
goonking said:
after doing some algebra in the angular momentum section. i get :

10 = (Vf * 1/2) + ( D ω )

seems right so far?
ehild said:
No, I do not think it is right. And you need vf, not D.
the D's must cancel out somewhere, I'm still trying to figure out where.
 
  • #40
goonking said:
the D's must cancel out somewhere, I'm still trying to figure out where.
Work symbolically. Keep D and isolate omega.
 
  • #41
ehild said:
Work symbolically. Keep D and isolate omega.
ω = (60 D - Vf D) / 2D^2

correct?
 
  • #42
goonking said:
ω = (60 D - Vf D) / 2D^2

correct?
if my algebra is correct, i can simplify more by canceling out the D's to get :

ω = (60 - Vf) / 2?
 
  • #43
It is certainly wrong, Check the dimensions.
 
  • #44
I will continue looking at this problem when i come back from school. hopefully I will see things I didn't see before lol
 
  • #45
goonking said:
Kinetic energy :
1/2 m vi^2 = (1/2 m vf^2) +(1/2) (I) (ω^2)angular momentum:

m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( I ω)

I =1/12*M* D^2

=
m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( (1/12*M* D^2) ω)

These are the correct equations, and M=2m.

From the first equation, you got
ω = (60 D - Vf D) / 2D^2
which is almost correct, but you have an algebraic error.

Substituting ##I=\frac{1}{12} (2m) D^2 ## into the angular momentum equation (m vi D/2 )= (m vf D/2) + ( I ω), you get

##m v_i \frac{D}{2}= m v_f \frac{D}{2}+ \frac{1}{12} (2m) D^2 \omega ## .

Simplifying, it results in ## v_i - v_f = \frac{1}{3} D \omega ## . I think you made the error when multiplying by the constants.

So you get Dω in terms of the velocities. Working with the energy equation, (Dω )2 appears. Substitute .
 
  • #46
ehild said:
These are the correct eq uations, and M=2m.

From the first equation, you got

which is almost correct, but you have an algebraic error.

Substituting ##I=\frac{1}{12} (2m) D^2 ## into the angular momentum equation (m vi D/2 )= (m vf D/2) + ( I ω), you get

##m v_i \frac{D}{2}= m v_f \frac{D}{2}+ \frac{1}{12} (2m) D^2 \omega ## .

Simplifying, it results in ## v_i - v_f = \frac{1}{3} D \omega ## . I think you made the error when multiplying by the constants.

So you get Dω in terms of the velocities. Working with the energy equation, (Dω )2 appears. Substitute .
yes, the algebra was very long.

anyways, i got 1/2 m vo 2 = 1/2 m vf2 + 1/2 ((m d2) / 6 ) (3/d (vo - vf))2

1/2's and m's cancel out from each side.

vo2 = vf2 + (d2/6) ((9/d2 (vo - vf)2)

d's cancel out

vo2 = vf2 + (3/2) (vo- vf)2

now do should i foil the (vo- vf)2?
 
Last edited:
  • #47
goonking said:
vo2 = vf2 + (3/2) (vo- vf)2

now do should i foil the (vo- vf)2?

You can substitute the numerical value of vo now. Expand the square and solve the quadratic equation.
 
Back
Top