Lie Algebra: Ideal Homework Proving \pi ^{-1} (\mathfrak{f}) is an Ideal

In summary, the conversation discusses the definition of the canonical homomorphism between a Lie algebra and its quotient, as well as the inverse image of a given ideal in the quotient algebra. The task at hand is to prove that this inverse image is also an ideal of the original Lie algebra. The solution involves showing that the commutator of any two elements in the inverse image is also in the inverse image, thus proving its closure under the Lie bracket operation.
  • #1
Ted123
446
0

Homework Statement



Let [itex]\mathfrak{g}[/itex] be any lie algebra and [itex]\mathfrak{h}[/itex] be any ideal of [itex]\mathfrak{g}[/itex].

The canonical homomorphism [itex]\pi : \mathfrak{g} \to \mathfrak{g/h}[/itex] is defined [itex]\pi (x) = x + \mathfrak{h}[/itex] for all [itex]x\in\mathfrak{g}[/itex].

For any ideal [itex]\mathfrak{f}[/itex] of the quotient lie algebra [itex]\mathfrak{g/h}[/itex], consider the inverse image of [itex]\mathfrak{f}[/itex] in [itex]\mathfrak{g}[/itex] relative to [itex]\pi[/itex], that is: [tex]\pi ^{-1} (\mathfrak{f}) = \{X\in\mathfrak{g} : \pi (X)\in \mathfrak{f} \} .[/tex]
Prove that [itex]\pi ^{-1} (\mathfrak{f})[/itex] is an ideal of the lie algebra [itex]\mathfrak{g}[/itex].

The Attempt at a Solution



See below
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is my attempt:

Let [itex]x\in\mathfrak{g}[/itex] and [itex]y\in\pi ^{-1}(\mathfrak{f})[/itex].

We want to show that [itex][x,y]\in\pi ^{-1}(\mathfrak{f})[/itex]. That is, if [itex]\pi ([x,y]) \in \mathfrak{f}[/itex].

Now [itex]\pi ([x,y]) = [\pi (x) , \pi (y)][/itex] since [itex]\pi[/itex] is a homomorphism.

And since [itex]y\in \pi ^{-1}(\mathfrak{f})[/itex], [itex]\pi (y) \in \mathfrak{f}[/itex].

But [itex][\pi (x) , \pi (y)] \in \mathfrak{f}[/itex] for all [itex]\pi (x) \in \mathfrak{g/h}[/itex] and [itex]\pi (y) \in \mathfrak{f}[/itex] since [itex]\mathfrak{f}[/itex] is an ideal of [itex]\mathfrak{g/h}[/itex] and [itex]\pi (x) = x+\mathfrak{h} \in \mathfrak{g/h}[/itex].

Therefore [itex]\pi ([x,y])\in\mathfrak{f}[/itex] and [itex]\pi ^{-1}(\mathfrak{f})[/itex] is an ideal of [itex]\mathfrak{g}[/itex].

Can anyone spot any mistakes or anything I've done wrong?
 
Last edited:

Related to Lie Algebra: Ideal Homework Proving \pi ^{-1} (\mathfrak{f}) is an Ideal

1. What is a Lie algebra?

A Lie algebra is a mathematical structure that studies the algebraic properties of vector fields and their associated operations, such as bracketing and Lie derivatives. It is used to understand the symmetries and transformations of geometric objects.

2. What is an ideal in Lie algebra?

An ideal in Lie algebra is a special type of subalgebra that is closed under the bracket operation. It is a fundamental concept in Lie algebra, as it allows for the study of quotients and factor algebras, which are important in understanding the structure of a Lie algebra.

3. What does it mean to prove \pi ^{-1} (\mathfrak{f}) is an ideal?

Proving \pi ^{-1} (\mathfrak{f}) is an ideal means showing that the preimage of a subalgebra \mathfrak{f} under the homomorphism \pi is also a subalgebra that satisfies the properties of an ideal. This is important because it allows us to understand the structure of the original subalgebra \mathfrak{f} in terms of the larger Lie algebra.

4. How do you prove \pi ^{-1} (\mathfrak{f}) is an ideal?

To prove \pi ^{-1} (\mathfrak{f}) is an ideal, we need to show that it satisfies the two defining properties of an ideal: closure under the bracket operation and absorption under scalar multiplication. This can be done by using the definition of \pi ^{-1} (\mathfrak{f}) and the properties of the homomorphism \pi.

5. Why is proving \pi ^{-1} (\mathfrak{f}) is an ideal important?

Proving \pi ^{-1} (\mathfrak{f}) is an ideal is important because it allows us to understand the structure of the original subalgebra \mathfrak{f} in terms of the larger Lie algebra. This can help us study the symmetries and transformations of geometric objects, as well as understand the structure of more complex Lie algebras.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top