Matrix representations of angular momentum operators

In summary, the commutation relations and the sum-of-the-squares identity tell us that \hat{L}_x and \hat{L}_y are both equal to \hat{L}_z.
  • #1
thecommexokid
70
2

Homework Statement



Write down the 3×3 matrices that represent the operators [itex]\hat{L}_x[/itex], [itex]\hat{L}_y[/itex], and [itex]\hat{L}_z[/itex] of angular momentum for a value of [itex]\ell=1[/itex] in a basis which has [itex]\hat{L}_z[/itex] diagonal.

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so my basis states [itex]\left\{\left|\ell,m\right\rangle\right\}[/itex] are [itex]\left|1,-1\right\rangle[/itex], [itex]\left|1,0\right\rangle[/itex], and [itex]\left|1,1\right\rangle[/itex]. [itex]\hat{L}_z\left|\ell, m\right\rangle=\hbar m\left|\ell,m\right\rangle[/itex], so the matrix representation of [itex]\hat{L}_z[/itex] is easy: [tex]\hat{L}_z \doteq \left( \begin{array}{ccc} -\hbar & & \\ & 0 & \\ & & \hbar \end{array} \right).[/tex] But I don't know what to do in order to determine [itex]\hat{L}_x[/itex] and [itex]\hat{L}_y[/itex].

Homework Equations



The commutation relations [itex]\left[ \hat{L}_x, \hat{L}_y \right] = i\hbar \hat{L}_z[/itex], etc., could maybe be useful but I'm not sure how.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes you should also use the fact that the matrices should be linearly independent (they form a so(3) basis).

The commutation relations give you 3 equations, plus if needed you can use the fact that the sum of the squares must be prorportional to the identity.

You should be able to find them by solving the system of equations.
 
  • #3
You could express ##\hat{L}_x## and ##\hat{L}_y## in terms of the raising and lowering operators. The matrices for the latter are easy to write down.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #4
vela said:
You could express ##\hat{L}_x## and ##\hat{L}_y## in terms of the raising and lowering operators. The matrices for the latter are easy to write down.

Thank you so much for your suggestion. Here's my attempt at following it. I know that$$\begin{align*}
\hat L_+\left|1,-1\right\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{2} \left|1,0\right\rangle \\
\hat L_+\left|1,0\right\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{2} \left|1,1\right\rangle \\
\hat L_+\left|1,1\right\rangle &= 0
\end{align*}$$ and $$\begin{align*}
\hat L_-\left|1,-1\right\rangle &= 0 \\
\hat L_-\left|1,0\right\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{2} \left|1,-1\right\rangle \\
\hat L_-\left|1,1\right\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{2} \left|1,0\right\rangle.
\end{align*}$$
From these statements we can work out that $$\hat L_+\doteq \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & 0 & 0 \\
\hbar\sqrt2 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \hbar\sqrt2& 0
\end{array}\right)$$ and $$\hat L_-\doteq \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & \hbar\sqrt2 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \hbar\sqrt2 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{array}\right).$$ I know the raising and lowering operators are defined as $$\begin{align*}
\hat L_+ &= \hat L_x + i\hat L_y \\
\hat L_-&= \hat L_x - i\hat L_y.
\end{align*}$$ So, in reverse, we can say that $$\begin{align*}
\hat L_x &= \tfrac12 \left(\hat L_+ + \hat L_-\right) \doteq \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt2} \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & 1 & 0 \\
1 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 1 & 0
\end{array}\right)\\
\hat L_y &= \tfrac{1}{2i} \left(\hat L_+ - \hat L_-\right) \doteq \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt2} \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & i & 0 \\
-i & 0 & i \\
0 & -i & 0
\end{array}\right).
\end{align*}$$ As a check, these matrices uphold both the commutation relations and the sum-of-the-squares identity kevinferreira mentioned above.
 
  • #5




As a scientist, it is important to understand the underlying principles and equations that govern a system. In this case, we are dealing with the operators of angular momentum, specifically for a value of \ell=1 in a basis where \hat{L}_z is diagonal. The basis states are \left\{\left|\ell,m\right\rangle\right\} with m=-1,0,1.

To find the matrix representations of \hat{L}_x and \hat{L}_y, we can use the commutation relations \left[ \hat{L}_x, \hat{L}_y \right] = i\hbar \hat{L}_z and \left[ \hat{L}_y, \hat{L}_z \right] = i\hbar \hat{L}_x, which are derived from the fundamental commutation relation \left[ \hat{L}_i, \hat{L}_j \right] = i\hbar \epsilon_{ijk} \hat{L}_k. Here, \epsilon_{ijk} is the Levi-Civita symbol.

Using these relations, we can find the matrices for \hat{L}_x and \hat{L}_y as \hat{L}_x \doteq \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \end{array} \right) and \hat{L}_y \doteq \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 & -i & 0 \\ i & 0 & -i \\ 0 & i & 0 \end{array} \right).

These matrices satisfy the commutation relations and are in the basis where \hat{L}_z is diagonal. I encourage you to verify this by calculating the commutators using these matrices.

In summary, we can use the commutation relations and the knowledge of the diagonal basis for \hat{L}_z to find the matrix representations of \hat{L}_x and \hat{L}_y. This is a common approach in quantum mechanics and is essential for understanding the behavior of physical systems.
 

FAQ: Matrix representations of angular momentum operators

What are the angular momentum operators in matrix form?

The angular momentum operators in matrix form are the x, y, and z components of the angular momentum operator, L, which can be represented as matrices of the form:

Lx = h/2π * [0 -i 0; i 0 0; 0 0 0]

Ly = h/2π * [0 0 i; 0 0 0; -i 0 0]

Lz = h/2π * [0 0 0; 0 0 -i; 0 i 0]

How are the matrix representations of angular momentum operators related to each other?

The matrix representations of angular momentum operators are related to each other through the commutation relations:

[Lx, Ly] = i Lz

[Ly, Lz] = i Lx

[Lz, Lx] = i Ly

How are the matrix representations of angular momentum operators used in quantum mechanics?

The matrix representations of angular momentum operators are used in quantum mechanics to describe the spin of particles, which is an intrinsic form of angular momentum. These operators are used to calculate the spin of particles and their interactions with other particles.

Are there any physical applications of the matrix representations of angular momentum operators?

Yes, there are several physical applications of the matrix representations of angular momentum operators. They are used in spectroscopy to describe the energy levels and transitions of atoms, in nuclear physics to study the properties of atomic nuclei, and in quantum computing to manipulate the states of quantum bits.

How are the matrix representations of angular momentum operators related to the classical concept of angular momentum?

The matrix representations of angular momentum operators are related to the classical concept of angular momentum through the correspondence principle, which states that in the classical limit, quantum mechanics should reproduce classical mechanics. In this case, the matrix representations of angular momentum operators reduce to the classical angular momentum vector, L = r x p.

Similar threads

Back
Top