- #1
andresordonez
- 68
- 0
Hi, I have a doubt about the fine structure of the hydrogenic atoms. In the section 3.2 of the book Physics of Atoms and Molecules by Bransden & Joachain says:
Since the electric dipole operator [tex] \mathbf{D} = -e\mathbf{r} [/tex] does not depend on the spin, the selection rule derived in Chapter 4 for the quantum number [tex] l [/tex] (in the dipole approximation) remains
[tex] \Delta l = \pm 1 [/tex]
from which it follows that the selection rule with respect to the quantum number [tex] j [/tex] is
[tex] \Delta j = 0, \pm 1 [/tex]
My question is, why [tex] \Delta j = \pm 2 [/tex] is not mentioned here? For example, why the transition
[tex] (n=3, l=2, j=5/2) \rightarrow (n=2, l=1, j=1/2) [/tex] is not considered?
(where [tex]n[/tex] is the energy number, [tex]l[/tex] is the orbital number, and [tex]j[/tex] is the total angular momentum number)
Since the electric dipole operator [tex] \mathbf{D} = -e\mathbf{r} [/tex] does not depend on the spin, the selection rule derived in Chapter 4 for the quantum number [tex] l [/tex] (in the dipole approximation) remains
[tex] \Delta l = \pm 1 [/tex]
from which it follows that the selection rule with respect to the quantum number [tex] j [/tex] is
[tex] \Delta j = 0, \pm 1 [/tex]
My question is, why [tex] \Delta j = \pm 2 [/tex] is not mentioned here? For example, why the transition
[tex] (n=3, l=2, j=5/2) \rightarrow (n=2, l=1, j=1/2) [/tex] is not considered?
(where [tex]n[/tex] is the energy number, [tex]l[/tex] is the orbital number, and [tex]j[/tex] is the total angular momentum number)