Newton's Second Law in NON-inertial frame of reference

In summary, the problem involves a steel ball suspended from an accelerating frame by two cords, with the goal of finding the acceleration of the frame that will cause the tension in one cord to be twice that of the other. The solution involves using F=ma to relate the forces on the inside of the frame to the frame itself, and drawing a force diagram to determine the angle of the external force needed to achieve the desired tension ratio.
  • #1
Spiewgels
9
0

Homework Statement


The steel ball is suspended from the accelerating frame by the two cords A and B. The angles (they are on the inside) are both 60 degrees.

Determine the acceleration of the frame which will cause the tension in A to be twice that in B. The acceleration is going to the right and the cord A is to the right of the moving frame.

Provide your answer in m/s/s with one decimal point accuracy


Homework Equations


I want to know how to relate the forces on the inside of the accelerating frame to the accelerating frame itself.


The Attempt at a Solution


Thus far, I have drawn free body diagrams to the inside cords and steel ball. I broke down the components of cord A and B and found the x-coordinate of cord A to be Acos60 and y-coordinate of Asin60. I got these same results for cord B. Combining knowns I've determined both cords tension to be .87w where w equals the weight of the ball. I'm now stuck and don't know how this relates to the moving frame where I think the force is F=ma(of x) and a(of x)=F/m...Have I screwed up this entire problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You've apparently solved the problem of a ball hanging in a gravitational field using F=mg. In an frame with acceleration vector a, the equivalent force is given by F=ma (obviously) in the direction opposite to the acceleration. So redraw your force diagram, but this time instead of drawing the 'external' force as pointing straight down, let it point at some angle. Your job is to determine that angle so you get the right tension relation.
 
  • #3


I would like to clarify that Newton's Second Law applies to both inertial and non-inertial frames of reference. In a non-inertial frame, the acceleration of the frame must be taken into account when calculating the forces acting on objects within the frame. In this scenario, we can use the equations of motion for a non-inertial frame to relate the forces acting on the cords and the steel ball to the acceleration of the frame itself.

To determine the acceleration of the frame, we can use the fact that the tension in cord A is twice that in cord B. This means that the net force in the x-direction must be equal to zero, as there is no acceleration in that direction. Therefore, we can set up the equation:

2Tsin60 - Tsin60 = ma

Where T is the tension in cord A, m is the mass of the steel ball, and a is the acceleration of the frame. Solving for a, we get:

a = T/m = (2Tsin60 - Tsin60)/m = T/m = 0.5g

Where g is the acceleration due to gravity. Therefore, the acceleration of the frame is 0.5g to the right.

I hope this helps clarify the relationship between the forces on the inside of the accelerating frame and the frame itself. It is important to consider the acceleration of the frame when analyzing forces in a non-inertial frame.
 

FAQ: Newton's Second Law in NON-inertial frame of reference

What is Newton's Second Law in a non-inertial frame of reference?

Newton's Second Law states that the force acting on an object is equal to the mass of the object multiplied by its acceleration. In a non-inertial frame of reference, this law still holds true, but the acceleration of the object may be different due to the influence of fictitious forces.

How does a non-inertial frame of reference affect the application of Newton's Second Law?

In a non-inertial frame of reference, the observed forces on an object may be different from the actual forces acting on the object. This is because the acceleration of the frame itself can create fictitious forces that are not present in an inertial frame. Therefore, in order to accurately apply Newton's Second Law, the acceleration of the non-inertial frame must be taken into account.

Can you provide an example of a non-inertial frame of reference affecting Newton's Second Law?

One example is a person standing in an elevator that is accelerating upward. From the perspective of the person in the elevator, they may feel a force pulling them downward, which is the fictitious force caused by the acceleration of the elevator. However, from an outside inertial frame, there is no force acting on the person and they would remain at rest.

How does the concept of fictitious forces relate to Newton's Second Law in a non-inertial frame of reference?

Fictitious forces are a result of the acceleration of a non-inertial frame and are not true forces in the traditional sense. However, in order to accurately apply Newton's Second Law in a non-inertial frame, these fictitious forces must be taken into account along with the actual forces acting on the object.

Are there any practical applications of understanding Newton's Second Law in a non-inertial frame of reference?

Understanding Newton's Second Law in a non-inertial frame of reference is important in many fields, such as aerospace engineering and navigation. For example, when designing a spacecraft or aircraft, engineers must consider the effects of fictitious forces in order to accurately predict the motion of the object. Similarly, navigation systems that use accelerometers must account for the fictitious forces in order to accurately measure acceleration and determine the object's position.

Similar threads

Back
Top