Obtaining the Hamiltonian for Einstein's Lagrangian: A Wheeler-De Witt Approach

In summary, the approach to obtaining the Hamiltonian for general relativity involves using the ADM formalism, which was developed by Arnowitt, Deser, and Misner. This involves foliating the spacetime into a product of \mathbb{R}\times\Sigma and using a specific form of the four-dimensional line element. The Einstein-Hilbert action can then be rewritten in terms of the three-dimensional scalar curvature and extrinsic curvature, allowing for the calculation of the canonical momenta. The Hamiltonian is then obtained through a Legendre transform. It is important to note that a global foliation is necessary for the Cauchy problem to be stable.
  • #1
eljose
492
0
If we have the Einstein Lagrangian...[tex] L= \sqrt (-g)R [/tex] my question is how do you get the Hamiltonian?..the approach by Wheeler-De Witt is to consider the line element:

[tex] ds^2 = N(t)dt^^2 + g_ij dx^i dz^ j [/tex] (Einstein sum convention) and then substitute it into the Lagrangian above and perform a Legendre transform in the form:

[tex] \pi_ij \dot g_ij -L [/tex] where "pi2 are the momenta.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The approach you quote above is both (a) wrong, and (b) not due to Wheeler & De Witt. The original work on the Hamiltonian, or canonical, description of general relativity is called the ADM formalism (after Roger Arnowitt, Stanley Deser, and Charles Misner). Their paper is called "The dynamics of general relativity" and is available on gr-qc.

The essential content of their work is as follows. One supposes that one has a spacetime [tex](\mathcal{M},g)[/tex] which represents a solution to Einstein's field equations. You can, of course, derive these field equations from the standard Einstein-Hilbert action

[tex]S = \int d^4x \sqrt{-g}R[/tex]

where [tex]R[/tex] is the four-dimensional scalar curvature and [tex]\sqrt{-g}[/tex] is a volume element on the manifold. You then suppose that the spacetime can be "foliated" or sliced so that globally* it looks like the product [tex]\mathbb{R}\times\Sigma[/tex]. You then perform a little bit of geometry to work out that the four-dimensional line element takes the form

[tex]ds^2 = -(N^2 - N_iN^i)dt^2 + 2N_i dx^idt + \gamma_{ij}dx^idx^j[/tex]

where [tex]N[/tex] is the lapse function, [tex]N^i[/tex] is the shift vector, and [tex]\gamma_{ij}[/tex] is a three-dimensional metric on a spatial hypersurface in the spacetime. A little bit more geometry then allows you to show that the Einstein-Hilbert action can be rewritten in the following form:

[tex]S = \int dtd^3x\sqrt{\gamma}N(R- \mathrm{tr}K^2 + K_{ij}K^{ij})[/tex]

where [tex]R[/tex] now stands for the three-dimensional scalar curvature of the hypersurface, [tex]K_{ij}[/tex] is the extrinsic curvature of the hypersurface in the spacetime, and [tex]\mathrm{tr}K=\gamma^{ij}K_{ij}[/tex]. (I'm ignoring all boundary terms here.) Since the extrinsic curvature is defined in terms of the metric velocity [tex]\dot{\gamma}_{ij}[/tex] you can vary the action with respect to the metric velocity to obtain an expression for the canonical momenta

[tex]\pi^{ij} \equiv \frac{\delta\mathcal{L}}{\delta\dot{\gamma}_{ij}} = \sqrt{\gamma}(\gamma^{ij}\mathrm{tr}K - K^{ij})[/tex]

You then simply write the Hamiltonian as you have suggested above. If you're interested, the best way to learn this is to look at section 2.8 of Hawking & Ellis, followed by chapter 21 of Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler.*: I seem to recall reading on here recently that some people believe that this foliation has to hold only locally in order that the 3+1 formulation be well-posed. This is not true! You need a global foliation in order that the Cauchy problem is stable, something which becomes particularly important when you consider boundary contributions at spatial infinity.
 
Last edited:
  • #3


The Hamiltonian is a crucial quantity in classical mechanics and is defined as the sum of the kinetic and potential energies of a system. In order to obtain the Hamiltonian for Einstein's Lagrangian, we can follow the Wheeler-De Witt approach. This approach involves using the line element ds^2 and performing a Legendre transform on the Lagrangian.

Firstly, we substitute the line element into the Lagrangian, which gives us:

L = \sqrt(-g)R = \sqrt(N(t)dt^2 + g_ij dx^i dz^j)R

Next, we introduce the momenta \pi_ij and perform the Legendre transform in the form:

H = \pi_ij \dot g_ij - L

This results in the Hamiltonian for Einstein's Lagrangian:

H = \pi_ij \dot g_ij - \sqrt(N(t)dt^2 + g_ij dx^i dz^j)R

This Hamiltonian captures the dynamics of the gravitational field described by the Lagrangian. It is a key quantity in the Wheeler-De Witt approach, as it allows us to study the evolution of the gravitational field over time.

In summary, the Wheeler-De Witt approach involves using the line element and performing a Legendre transform to obtain the Hamiltonian for Einstein's Lagrangian. This Hamiltonian is an important quantity in understanding the dynamics of the gravitational field and plays a significant role in classical mechanics.
 

FAQ: Obtaining the Hamiltonian for Einstein's Lagrangian: A Wheeler-De Witt Approach

What is the Hamiltonian for Einstein's Lagrangian?

The Hamiltonian for Einstein's Lagrangian is a mathematical expression that represents the total energy of a system in terms of its position and momentum variables. It is derived from the Lagrangian, which is a function that describes the dynamics of a system by taking into account its kinetic and potential energies.

Why is a Wheeler-De Witt approach used to obtain the Hamiltonian?

The Wheeler-De Witt approach is a mathematical framework used to describe the dynamics of a system without the concept of time. This is particularly useful in the context of general relativity, which does not have a well-defined notion of time. Therefore, using this approach allows for a consistent and elegant formulation of the Hamiltonian for Einstein's Lagrangian.

How is the Hamiltonian derived from the Lagrangian using the Wheeler-De Witt approach?

The Hamiltonian is obtained by applying the Hamiltonian constraint, which is a mathematical equation that ensures the consistency of the Wheeler-De Witt approach. This constraint is applied to the Lagrangian to obtain the Hamiltonian as a function of the position and momentum variables of the system.

What are the implications of obtaining the Hamiltonian for Einstein's Lagrangian?

Obtaining the Hamiltonian for Einstein's Lagrangian allows for a better understanding of the dynamics of a system described by general relativity. It also provides a framework for studying the quantum properties of the system, which is important in the context of quantum gravity and the search for a unified theory of physics.

Are there any limitations to using the Wheeler-De Witt approach to obtain the Hamiltonian?

Yes, there are limitations. The Wheeler-De Witt approach does not take into account the concept of time, which can be a crucial factor in some physical systems. It also neglects the effects of quantum fluctuations, which can be significant in certain scenarios. Therefore, the Hamiltonian obtained using this approach may not accurately describe all aspects of a system's dynamics.

Back
Top