- #1
aaaa202
- 1,169
- 2
I have an operator which is written in k space as something like:
H = Ʃkckak
where a_k and c_k are operators. So it is a sum of operators of different k but there are no crossterms as you can see. Being no crossterms does this mean that the operator is diagonalized in the language of linear algebra. That a matrix is diagonalized means that it is represented in a basis of eigenstates but this is an expansion of an operator so I am not sure.
Edit; any operator is of course an expansion in operators related to the basis of eigenstates {e_k} by the equation:
Ʃi,jle_i><e_jl a_ij
Now to be diagonalized would mean the vanishing of all matrix elements where i≠j. Can this be said about the given Hamiltonian above. How do I know how the c_k and a_k are related to my eigenbasis.
H = Ʃkckak
where a_k and c_k are operators. So it is a sum of operators of different k but there are no crossterms as you can see. Being no crossterms does this mean that the operator is diagonalized in the language of linear algebra. That a matrix is diagonalized means that it is represented in a basis of eigenstates but this is an expansion of an operator so I am not sure.
Edit; any operator is of course an expansion in operators related to the basis of eigenstates {e_k} by the equation:
Ʃi,jle_i><e_jl a_ij
Now to be diagonalized would mean the vanishing of all matrix elements where i≠j. Can this be said about the given Hamiltonian above. How do I know how the c_k and a_k are related to my eigenbasis.
Last edited: