Original Bell article with the proof of his inequality Is necessary.

In summary, The conversation discusses the possibility of downloading a copy of Bell J.S. Physics 1964,1,195 and the purpose of Bell's inequality in relation to quantum mechanics. The speaker also expresses gratitude for finding the paper on a website and mentions that a similar argument can be found in Griffith's Intro. to Quantum Mechanics.
  • #1
Alexey
8
0
Bell J.S. Physics. 1964,1,195.
Whether is not present at somebody?
Whether is it possible download it somewhere ?

There is interesting to my what purpose had Bell, proving an inequality. Is it to deny a quantum mechanics? I hope, that from this article it will be possible to gather the answers to these (and similar) questions.

My e-mail: lesha74@rambler.ru .
Thank.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
thanks a lot, Dr.Chinese, for putting it up at your webpage...i got it from there...and the EPR and aspect papers too... through google search!

the original argument is there in Griffith( Intro. to Quantum Mechanics),though the paper as such is not there...the argument there is the same as in the original Bell's paper posted at your site
 

FAQ: Original Bell article with the proof of his inequality Is necessary.

What is the "Original Bell article"?

The "Original Bell article" refers to the groundbreaking paper published by physicist John Stewart Bell in 1964, titled "On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox". In this article, Bell provided a mathematical proof of the famous Bell's inequality, which showed that certain quantum phenomena could not be explained by classical theories.

What is Bell's inequality?

Bell's inequality is a mathematical expression that sets a limit on the correlations between certain measurements made on entangled quantum particles. If this inequality is violated, it suggests that classical theories cannot fully explain the behavior of these particles and that quantum mechanics must be used instead.

Why is the proof of Bell's inequality important?

The proof of Bell's inequality is significant because it provided the first concrete evidence that quantum mechanics cannot be fully explained by classical theories. This has had a major impact on our understanding of the fundamental nature of reality and has led to the development of new technologies, such as quantum computing.

Is the proof of Bell's inequality necessary?

Yes, the proof of Bell's inequality is necessary for a deeper understanding of quantum mechanics and its implications on our understanding of the universe. It also has practical applications in fields such as cryptography and information technology.

What impact has the proof of Bell's inequality had on the scientific community?

The proof of Bell's inequality has had a significant impact on the scientific community, leading to further research and experiments in the field of quantum mechanics. It has also sparked debates and discussions about the nature of reality and the limitations of classical theories. It continues to be a topic of interest and study in the scientific community today.

Similar threads

I An Alternative form of Bell's Inequality
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Is there another workable interpretation of the Bell Inequality?
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Bell's theorem claimed to be refuted - paper published by EPL
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
I Is Bell's Theorem Inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics?
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
I Do I understand Bell's Inequality Test correctly?
Replies
1
Views
1K
A The experiment for testing the CHSH inequalities
Replies
11
Views
2K
I A popular explanation of Bell's inequalities
Replies
16
Views
2K
I Understanding Bell Inequality Proof: Explained from a Probability Perspective
2
Replies
44
Views
3K
I Looking For Help Understanding Bell's Theorem, Hidden Variables & QM
3
Replies
80
Views
5K
I Generalizing the Bell Inequality for Arbitrary Measurement Axes
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top