PhD in theoretical physics in Europe. Concerns and Ideas.

[PhysiSmo]

Greetings to all! As deadlines approach for PhD applications, I'm pretty confused about where to get my PhD and the implications of my choice. I'd really like to hear some opinions on my dilemma.

Firstly, I'm currently in a MSc program somewhere in Europe and estimate to graduate on the forthcoming summer. I haven't been proposed to continue my studies in my country yet, but it is very likely to happen so. Thus, the following dilemma arises.

On the one hand, I can start my PhD studies here, with a quite prominent supervisor. Not a really big BIG name, but recognizable enough, at least in some degree. I've discussed with his current PhD fellows and heard the best for his attitude towards them, his great skill of collaboration and help aiding. There also exist approximately 3-5 publications for each one of them in about 3 years. Hence he possesses the two major characteristics I've been searching for my potential supervisor: (i) sufficient academic career and matching with my research interests and (ii) great collaboration spirit.

From my point of view, a PhD supervisor is the person that learns one how to actually do research on his own. As far as I understand, this is the most crucial point, thus giving extra credits to the person I'm referring to. The disadvantages of this particular choice of mine have to do with the country I live in. There is a great possibility that I don't get paid at all, at least for one or two years, which is awful. Furthermore, the academic environment is somehow isolated from the rest of the world, which is also awful. No conferences are being made (1 in two years approximately), no lectures are being given by visiting academic staff etc.

On the other hand, I could move into a more academically healthy environment, find a great team to work with, or a bigger name to supervise me in my thesis, while the funds may come more easily, at least after the first year. The great disadvantage of this option has to do with the person/people I'll be working with. Having no clues at all about one's ability to collaborate with seems a little bit scary to me. After all, it's meaningless to be supervised by a big name in a prestigious university while getting no motivation and help at all. Especially at the PhD level, where one is supposed to learn the skills needed to proceed to a research field himself.

If it isn't clear from the above, my ultimate goal is to do research/work in an academical position. Therefore, if I choose the first option, I'll definitely jump into an another country for a postdoc position. In that case, though, I'll have acquired the desirable skills to stand on my own (as far as one can after obtained his/her phd), and work under very different conditions.

That is almost all! I'm looking forward in hearing other's opinions, please, share them if you wish so! Thanx!

 

[cristo]

I don't think a "big name" is that much of an advantage, if any! I would imagine that if you have a "big name" supervisor, then his time will be divided amongst many other people, and thus you will have less chance to see him. I don't really know what to advise you: if you want to go out and explore other countries, then do that, but if you want to stay in a place you are familiar with, then stay at your institution.

 

[Mene]

Dear researcher,

Thank you for sharing your concerns and ideas regarding your potential PhD studies in theoretical physics in Europe. It is understandable that with the approaching deadlines for applications, you are feeling overwhelmed and unsure about which path to take. As a scientist with experience in the field, I would like to provide some insights and advice that may help you in making this important decision.

Firstly, it is important to note that your choice of PhD supervisor is crucial in shaping your academic career and research skills. It seems that you have found a supervisor who possesses the two major characteristics you were looking for – sufficient academic career and matching research interests, as well as a great attitude towards collaboration and support for his PhD students. This is definitely a positive sign and should not be underestimated. As you mentioned, a PhD supervisor is the one who teaches you how to do research on your own, and having a supportive and experienced mentor can greatly benefit your growth as a researcher.

However, I understand your concerns about the academic environment in your country and the possibility of not receiving a stipend for the first year or two. While this may seem like a disadvantage, it is important to consider the long-term benefits of working with a good supervisor and the potential for future opportunities such as postdoc positions in other countries. Additionally, you can always look for external funding opportunities to support your studies.

On the other hand, moving to a different university or research team may provide you with a more academically healthy environment and the potential for better funding opportunities. However, as you mentioned, the potential downside is not knowing the abilities of your supervisor and the support you will receive. In this case, I would suggest reaching out to current or former PhD students of the potential supervisor and ask for their experiences and insights. This can give you a better understanding of what to expect and help you make an informed decision.

Ultimately, your ultimate goal is to work in an academic position, and it is important to choose a PhD program that will provide you with the necessary skills and experiences to achieve this goal. As you mentioned, even if you choose to do your PhD in a different country, you can always gain the skills needed to stand on your own and work under different conditions. Therefore, I would advise you to carefully consider all factors and prioritize the potential for a good supervisor and a supportive academic environment.

In conclusion, it is important to carefully weigh the pros and cons of each option and consider your long-term goals before making a decision. I