PI: More mokeys with Typewriters?

  • Thread starter Namloh2000
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Pi
In summary: The researchers say the attempt provides 'strong evidence' that monkeys are not capable of producing works of art beyond simple tool use."In summary, the post suggests that there is an infinite amount of monkeys typing at once, and that this could produce works of art beyond simple tool use. However, the study showed that monkeys were not able to produce works of art beyond simple tool use, and so this claim is not supported.
  • #1
Namloh2000
28
0
PI: More mokeys with Typewriters!?

There exists a recent post on the subject of an infinite amount of monkeys doing a lot of typing. You know the premise. I was going to post this there, but figured it might deserve to be a new thread altogether.

There's this number- Pi: 3.14159... and off it goes. It is irrational, meaning that it's digits are infinite, and that they never repeat in a cyclical fashion.

Studies have shown that Pi may also be "normal", meaning that it's digits are random in a certain statistical sense.

Lots of people study Pi. It's implications are more staggering than the average person would imagine. There is recent evidence suggesting that pi might contain just as many of any one number combination as there areany other number combination. Does that not imply that Pi has every number combination, including this post hidden somewhere within it's digits? Including Shakespeare?

Mind you: this is all within the realm of experimental mathematics.

But! (chuckle) If pi had every number combination, wouldn't one of those numbers contain infinite amount of zeros, making pi a rational number?

heh.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Infinity is not a number.
 
  • #3
I think pi has every finite number combination. It has only one infinitely long string of numbers: itself.
 
  • #4
Sven Tingblad said:
I think pi has every finite number combination. It has only one infinitely long string of numbers: itself.

Not so, depending on how you count your strings. For instance, you can construct 2 infinite sets of numbers, one by stringing together the digits at pi's even decimal places, the other by stringing together the digits at the odd decimal places. In fact, for any number n you could construct an infinite string by counting every nth digit, so you can really construct an infinite amount of infinite strings from pi. Of course, once you start doing things this way it becomes pretty arbitrary what kind of strings you can find.
 
  • #5
Namloh2000 said:
Does that not imply that Pi has every number combination, including this post hidden somewhere within it's digits? Including Shakespeare?

Pi is the biggest copyright violation and software theft ever encountered. All the police services should be chasing it.

:-p :-p

cheers,
Patrick.
 
  • #6
so is there any possibility that pi is rational?
 
  • #7
No, it was conclusively proven long ago that pi is not rational. In fact, it was proved in the 19th century that pi is not an "algebraic" number either.
 
  • #8
Namloh2000 said:
Studies have shown that Pi may also be "normal", meaning that it's digits are random in a certain statistical sense.

Lots of people study Pi. It's implications are more staggering than the average person would imagine. There is recent evidence suggesting that pi might contain just as many of anyone number combination as there areany other number combination. Does that not imply that Pi has every number combination, including this post hidden somewhere within it's digits? Including Shakespeare?

Note the use of the words "may" and "might". As far as I know the only numbers that have been conclusively proven to be "normal" are numbers that were specifically defined to fit that definition. On the other hand it has been proven that, in a strictly defined sense, "almost all" numbers are "normal".
 
  • #9
HallsofIvy said:
Note the use of the words "may" and "might". As far as I know the only numbers that have been conclusively proven to be "normal" are numbers that were specifically defined to fit that definition. On the other hand it has been proven that, in a strictly defined sense, "almost all" numbers are "normal".


Once again showing that pi is likely to be a "typical" number. Almost all numbers are irrational, and so is pi. Almost all numbers are transendental, and so is pi. And now normality.
 
  • #10
there are 2^aleph null real numbers, and most of these are normal. But there are only aleph null numbers that can be defined by computer programs, and pi is one of them. This means that, to a good approximation, none of the numbers can be defined by computer programs (the percentage that can is infinitesimal). Pi is not a typical number, it is part of an extremely small subset of real numbers, the computable numbers.
 
  • #11
Someone should write a book called "The PI Code" modeled on "The Bible Code". Remember to include predictions about the end of the world. There is a lot of money in it apparently.
 
  • #12
Could monkeys be used to reproduce the works of Shakespeare? Here is a scientific project that clearly demonstrated that this is impossible:

The BBC reports that some scholars at the University of Plymouth wanted to test the theory, so they put a computer in the monkeyhouse of a zoo. After a month, "The Sulawesi crested macaques had only succeeded in partially destroying the machine, using it as a lavatory, and mostly typing the letter 's.'"

This cost the British taxpayer 2000 pounds, but the director of the project Mike Phillips said, they “learned an awful lot."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/3013959.stm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
I think you should have included the quote from the Zoo director about this "proving the mathematicians wrong", which led to the NTK caption of "zoo confuses infinite and eight".
 

FAQ: PI: More mokeys with Typewriters?

What is "PI: More Monkeys with Typewriters" about?

"PI: More Monkeys with Typewriters" is a thought experiment that explores the concept of probability and randomness. It is based on the famous saying that given enough time, a group of monkeys randomly typing on typewriters will eventually produce the complete works of Shakespeare.

Who came up with the idea of "PI: More Monkeys with Typewriters"?

The concept of "PI: More Monkeys with Typewriters" was first proposed by mathematician Emile Borel in his book "Mécanique Statistique et Irréversibilité" in 1913. It has since been popularized and referenced in various forms of media, including literature, film, and television.

What is the purpose of "PI: More Monkeys with Typewriters"?

The purpose of "PI: More Monkeys with Typewriters" is to illustrate the concept of probability and how, given enough time and randomness, highly improbable events can occur. It also highlights the role of chance and randomness in our world and how it can ultimately lead to order and complexity.

Is "PI: More Monkeys with Typewriters" a real experiment?

No, "PI: More Monkeys with Typewriters" is a thought experiment and has not been conducted in real life. It is used as a theoretical scenario to explore the concept of probability and randomness and is not meant to be taken as a literal experiment.

Are there any real-life examples of "PI: More Monkeys with Typewriters"?

While the experiment itself has not been conducted, the concept of probability and randomness leading to highly improbable events has been observed in real life. This includes the formation of complex molecules and biological systems through chance processes and the occurrence of unlikely events like winning the lottery or being struck by lightning.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
8K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
52
Views
9K
Back
Top