Proof regarding composition of velocities

Since a<1, a*(1-b)<1*(1-b). So (a-ab)+b<1*(1-b)+b. Simplify. 1-b<1, which is true since b>0. Therefore, (a+b)/(1+ab)<1. In summary, we want to show that if 0<a<1 and 0<b<1, then (a+b)/(1+ab)<1. This can be proven by rewriting the expression as a linear function of b, and showing that it is always less than 1 for values of b between 0 and 1.
  • #1
drnickriviera
6
0

Homework Statement



This is a problem from D'Inverno's "Introducing Einstein's Relativity".

If vAB is the velocity of B with respect to A, vBC is the velocity of C with respect to B, and vAC is the velocity of C with respect to A (all velocities are in relativistic units, that is, c=1), prove that if 0<vAB<1 and 0<vBC<1, then vAC<1.


Homework Equations



The problem should be resolvable with just the equation

vAC=(vAB+vBC)/(1+vABvBC).



The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that there are other ways to prove this, but I want to know this particular approach. I suspect it boils down to showing that the numerator is less than the denominator. I have tried reducing the denominator and/or increasing the numerator to find a greater expression that is less than one, but so far nothing has worked. I know this is really just a mathematical proof and has little to do with conceptual relativity, but I'd still like the solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You want to show (a+b)/(1+ab)<1 if 0<a<1 and 0<b<1, right? Write it as a*(1-b)+1*b<1. a*(1-b)+1*b is a linear function of b as b goes from 0 to 1, right also? It's a weighted average of a and 1. So it must hit it's max and min at b=0 or b=1.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Dick said:
You want to show (a+b)/(1+ab)<1 if 0<a<1 and 0<b<1, right? Write it as a*(1-b)+1*b<1. a*(1-b)+1*b is a linear function of b as b goes from 0 to 1, right also? It's a weighted average of a and 1. So it must hit it's max and min at b=0 or b=1.

I'm sorry, I don't really understand how those two (the original expression and the linear function) are equivalent. Could you explain a little more deeply?
 
  • #4
Since a<1, b<1, we can rewrite them as: a=1-x, b=1-y, where x>0, y>0. This will make it a lot easier :smile:
 
  • #5
Ok, that works. Thanks a lot!
 
  • #6
drnickriviera said:
I'm sorry, I don't really understand how those two (the original expression and the linear function) are equivalent. Could you explain a little more deeply?

(a+b)/(1+ab)<1. Multiply both sides by (1+ab). (a+b)<1+ab. Subtract ab from both sides. a+b-ab<1. Collect terms and factor. (a-ab)+b<1, a*(1-b)+1*b<1.
 

FAQ: Proof regarding composition of velocities

What is the proof regarding composition of velocities?

The proof regarding composition of velocities is a mathematical concept that explains how to combine the velocities of two objects moving in different directions to determine their resulting velocity.

How is the proof regarding composition of velocities applied in science?

This concept is commonly used in physics and engineering to calculate the net velocity of an object that is subject to multiple forces or moving in multiple directions.

What is the equation used in the proof regarding composition of velocities?

The equation used is v = u + w, where v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity, and w is the added velocity from a second object.

Are there any limitations to the proof regarding composition of velocities?

Yes, this proof assumes that the velocities being combined are in the same reference frame and that there are no external forces acting on the objects.

Can the proof regarding composition of velocities be applied to any type of motion?

Yes, this proof can be applied to any type of motion, including linear, circular, and rotational motion, as long as the objects are moving in the same reference frame.

Similar threads

Back
Top