Prove U (Ai X Bi) [itex]\subseteq[/itex] (U Ai) X (U Bi)

  • Thread starter IntroAnalysis
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Ai
In summary, the conversation discusses how to prove that the union of indexed families of sets is a subset of the product of the unions of the individual sets. The solution involves using arbitrary elements and applying logical equivalencies to show the inclusion. A counterexample to the reverse inclusion may also be useful in understanding the concept."
  • #1
IntroAnalysis
64
0

Homework Statement


Suppose {Ai l i [itex]\in[/itex]I} and {Bi l i [itex]\in[/itex]I} are indexed families of sets.

Prove that U i [itex]\in[/itex]I(Ai X Bi) [itex]\subseteq[/itex] (Ui [itex]\in[/itex]IAi) X (Ui [itex]\in[/itex]IBi)


2. Relevant\subseteq equations
From How to Prove It, 2nd Edition, Sec. 4.1 #11a)


The Attempt at a Solution



Let (x, y) be arbitrary. Suppose (x, y) [itex]\in[/itex] [itex]\bigcup[/itex]i[itex]\in[/itex]I (Ai X Bi).

Since (x, y) [itex]\in[/itex][itex]\bigcup[/itex]i[itex]\in[/itex]I(Ai X Bi), there exists an i[itex]\in[/itex]I with x[itex]\in[/itex]Ai and y[itex]\in[/itex]Bi.

So x [itex]\in[/itex]{xl[itex]\exists[/itex]i[itex]\in[/itex]I(x[itex]\in[/itex]Ai)} and
y[itex]\in[/itex]{yl[itex]\exists[/itex]i[itex]\in[/itex]I(y[itex]\in[/itex]Bi)}

Therefore, x [itex]\in[/itex][itex]\bigcup[/itex]i[itex]\in[/itex]I Ai and y[itex]\in[/itex][itex]
\bigcup[/itex]i[itex]\in[/itex]I Bi.

This is equivalent to ([itex]\bigcup[/itex]i[itex]\in[/itex]I Ai) X ([itex]\bigcup[/itex]i[itex]\in[/itex]I Bi). Hence, [itex]\bigcup[/itex]i[itex]\in[/itex]I (Ai X Bi)[itex]\subseteq[/itex](Ui[itex]\in[/itex]I Ai) X ([itex]\bigcup[/itex]i[itex]\in[/itex]I Bi).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That looks very good!

It might be instructive to find a counterexample to the reverse inclusion...
 
  • #3
Thanks for commenting, I appreciate it. I have a very picky professor.
 

FAQ: Prove U (Ai X Bi) [itex]\subseteq[/itex] (U Ai) X (U Bi)

What is the meaning of "Prove U (Ai X Bi) [itex]\subseteq[/itex] (U Ai) X (U Bi)?"

This statement is a mathematical expression that is read as "prove that the Cartesian product of sets Ai and Bi is a subset of the Cartesian product of the universal set U and sets Ai and Bi." In simpler terms, it means to show that all elements in the first set of pairs (Ai X Bi) are also found in the second set of pairs (U Ai) X (U Bi).

Why is this concept important in mathematics?

The concept of subsets and Cartesian products is fundamental in mathematics. It allows us to define relationships between sets and analyze them in a structured way. This specific statement is important because it shows that the Cartesian product of two sets can be broken down into the Cartesian products of smaller sets, making it easier to understand and manipulate.

How can you prove this statement?

To prove this statement, we can use the definition of subsets which states that for two sets A and B, A is a subset of B if and only if every element in A is also in B. We can also use the definition of Cartesian products which states that the Cartesian product of two sets A and B is the set of all ordered pairs where the first element is from set A and the second element is from set B. By applying these definitions and using logical reasoning, we can prove the statement to be true.

Can you give an example of how this statement can be applied?

For example, let's say we have two sets A = {1, 2} and B = {3, 4}. The Cartesian product of these sets is A X B = {(1, 3), (1, 4), (2, 3), (2, 4)}. The universal set, in this case, could be the set of all whole numbers, U = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...}. Using the statement in question, we can prove that A X B is a subset of U X U, which means that all the pairs in A X B are also found in U X U.

Are there any real-life applications of this statement?

This statement has various real-life applications, especially in computer science and data analysis. It is used to define relationships between different data sets and to perform operations on them. It is also used in game theory and economics to analyze strategies and outcomes. In general, this concept is widely applicable in problem-solving and decision-making processes.

Back
Top