Proving ABC^TA^-1 = CB: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter MikeLowri123
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses a problem with proving the equation ABC^TA^-1=CB, where C^T is the transpose of C and A^-1 the inverse of A. Matrices B and A are covariance matrices and may be considered symmetric. The conversation includes an example that disproves the equation and a suggestion to simplify it to C^-1BA=AB^TC^-1. However, this is also disproven with a different example. The conversation ends with a request for suggestions to solve the problem.
  • #1
MikeLowri123
11
0
Hi all,

I have a suspicion this may be obvious but have lookd and can't seem to obtain the correct answer,

Can somone please explain the steps required to prove

ABC^TA^-1=CB

where C^T is the transpose of C and A^-1 the inverse of A. Matrices B and A are covariance matrices and thus may be considered symmetric if that helps

Thanks in advance for some direction
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


I don't think your requirements are sufficient. Consider A=1, B=[1,2;2,1], C=[0,0;1,0], for example. BC^T = [0,1;0,2], but CB = [0,0;1,2].
 
  • #3


Thanks for the reply, on a second look I now have:

AB^TC^-1BA=AB^TC^-1CAB^TC^-1

Which I can break down to:

AB^TC^-1BA=AB^TAB^TC^-1

is there anyway I can re-order the RHS to equal the left?

Thanks in advance
 
  • #4


Assuming A and B are invertible, this can be simplified to
C^-1BA=AB^TC^-1

As both A and B are symmetric, B^T=B and AB=BA (you can check this with the definition of matrix multiplication). Define D=AB and E=C^(-1). D is symmetric as well.

Therefore, your equation is equivalent to ED=DE for symmetric D and invertible E. But this is wrong, for example for D=[1,2;2,1] and E=[1,1;0,1].

Or, with the original matrices:
A=1, B=[1,2;2,1], C=[1,-1;0,1] violates the equation.
 
  • #5


Thanks for the quick response, Apologies however A and C are symmetric B is not does this chaneg anything
 
  • #6


I am attempting to work through a derivation and the step attached requires the above mentioned to hold, any suggestions appreciated
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7


14.63 to 14.64, should be an easy substitution but I can't get there
 
  • #8


no one ??
 

FAQ: Proving ABC^TA^-1 = CB: Step-by-Step Guide

What is the purpose of proving ABC^TA^-1 = CB?

The purpose of proving this equation is to demonstrate that the given matrices, A, B, and C, follow the laws of matrix multiplication and to show the relationship between the matrices.

What are the necessary steps to prove ABC^TA^-1 = CB?

The necessary steps to prove this equation are: 1) Use the associative property of matrix multiplication to rearrange the equation, 2) Use the inverse property to simplify the terms containing A^-1 and (C^T)^-1, 3) Use the transpose property to simplify the terms containing C^T, and 4) Use the commutative property of matrix multiplication to rearrange the equation to match the given equation.

What is the importance of the inverse property in proving this equation?

The inverse property is important because it allows us to simplify the terms containing A^-1 and (C^T)^-1. This helps us to manipulate the equation and ultimately prove the given equation.

How does the transpose property help in proving this equation?

The transpose property helps in simplifying the terms containing C^T. This allows us to manipulate the equation and ultimately prove the given equation.

Can this equation be proven with different matrices?

Yes, this equation can be proven with different matrices as long as the matrices follow the laws of matrix multiplication and have compatible dimensions.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
69
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top