- #1
fmilano
- 7
- 0
Hi, I need to show this:
[tex]b_m \geq\sum_{i=1}^n b_i^2[/tex]
given these three conditions:
[tex]b_m \geq b_i[/tex], for [tex]i=1..n[/tex] (in other words [tex]b_m = max(b_i)[/tex]) and
[tex]0 \leq b_i \leq 1[/tex] for [tex]i=1..n[/tex] and
[tex]\sum_{i=1}^n b_i=1[/tex]
I've been working for hours in this without results...Any clue would be really appreciated
(this is not a homework exercise. I'm just trying to convince myself that the bayes decision error bound is a lower bound for the nearest neighbor rule error bound, and to convince myself of that I've arrived at the conclusion that I have to show the above).
Thanks,
Federico
[tex]b_m \geq\sum_{i=1}^n b_i^2[/tex]
given these three conditions:
[tex]b_m \geq b_i[/tex], for [tex]i=1..n[/tex] (in other words [tex]b_m = max(b_i)[/tex]) and
[tex]0 \leq b_i \leq 1[/tex] for [tex]i=1..n[/tex] and
[tex]\sum_{i=1}^n b_i=1[/tex]
I've been working for hours in this without results...Any clue would be really appreciated
(this is not a homework exercise. I'm just trying to convince myself that the bayes decision error bound is a lower bound for the nearest neighbor rule error bound, and to convince myself of that I've arrived at the conclusion that I have to show the above).
Thanks,
Federico