Proving b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 Under Given Conditions

  • Thread starter fmilano
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Conditions
From this, we can see that b_{m} \geq \sum_{i = 1}^n b_{i}^2.In summary, we need to show that b_m \geq\sum_{i=1}^n b_i^2 given the conditions b_m \geq b_i, for i=1..n, 0 \leq b_i \leq 1 for i=1..n, and \sum_{i=1}^n b_i=1. This can be demonstrated by showing that 0 \leq b_{i}^2 \leq b_i \leq 1 and \sum_{i = 1}^n b
  • #1
fmilano
7
0
Hi, I need to show this:

[tex]b_m \geq\sum_{i=1}^n b_i^2[/tex]

given these three conditions:

[tex]b_m \geq b_i[/tex], for [tex]i=1..n[/tex] (in other words [tex]b_m = max(b_i)[/tex]) and

[tex]0 \leq b_i \leq 1[/tex] for [tex]i=1..n[/tex] and

[tex]\sum_{i=1}^n b_i=1[/tex]

I've been working for hours in this without results...Any clue would be really appreciated

(this is not a homework exercise. I'm just trying to convince myself that the bayes decision error bound is a lower bound for the nearest neighbor rule error bound, and to convince myself of that I've arrived at the conclusion that I have to show the above).

Thanks,

Federico
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Maybe this will help . . .

[tex]0 \leq b_{i}^2 \leq b_i \leq 1[/tex], this implies that [tex]\sum_{i = 1}^n b_{i}^2 \leq \sum_{i = 1}^n b_i = 1[/tex].
 

FAQ: Proving b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 Under Given Conditions

How do you prove b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 under given conditions?

To prove this inequality, we need to use mathematical induction. First, we assume that the inequality holds for some integer k. Then, we need to show that it also holds for k+1. By using the given conditions and manipulating the expressions, we can show that b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 for k+1. Then, by induction, we can conclude that the inequality holds for all positive integers.

What are the given conditions for proving b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2?

The given conditions can vary depending on the specific problem. However, some common conditions that are used to prove this inequality include the use of mathematical induction, the assumption that b_m is a positive integer, and the assumption that all b_i are also positive integers.

Can you provide an example of proving b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 under given conditions?

Sure, let's say we want to prove that for all positive integers k, k^2 ≥ ∑i^2 from i=1 to k. We can use mathematical induction to prove this. The base case is when k=1, and we can see that 1^2 ≥ ∑i^2 from i=1 to 1, which is true. Then, for the inductive step, we assume that k^2 ≥ ∑i^2 from i=1 to k. By manipulating the expressions and using the given conditions, we can show that (k+1)^2 ≥ ∑i^2 from i=1 to k+1, which proves the inequality for all positive integers.

Are there any common mistakes to watch out for when proving b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 under given conditions?

Yes, there are a few common mistakes that people make when proving this inequality. One is forgetting to use mathematical induction, which is essential for proving the inequality for all positive integers. Another common mistake is assuming that b_m or b_i are negative integers, which would invalidate the proof. It's also crucial to carefully manipulate the expressions and use the given conditions correctly.

Why is proving b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 under given conditions important in mathematics?

This type of proof is important because it allows us to establish relationships between different mathematical expressions and numbers. It also helps us understand the behavior of these expressions under certain conditions. Proving b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 under given conditions can also be used in more complex mathematical proofs and can lead to new discoveries and insights in the field of mathematics.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Back
Top