Proving Lagrangian EOM with Non-minimal Coupling

  • Thread starter kalish
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Coupling
B g_\mu\nuIn summary, the conversation is about difficulties in proving the equation g^{\mu \nu} \delta R_{\mu \nu} B(\phi) = (\nabla_{\mu} \nabla_\nu - \square B g_\mu_\nu) and verifying the correct form of the operator \square. The individual is also looking for hints to help them with their problem and discussing a potential mistake in the first equation. They also mention a different form of the operator \square that they found in a reference.
  • #1
kalish
28
0
Hi, I am currently in training and while deriving the EOM for a specific lagrangian I am having difficulties to prove that[tex]g^{\mu \nu} \delta R_{\mu \nu} B(\phi) = (\nabla_{\mu} \nabla_\nu - \square B g_\mu_\nu) [/tex] I am ashamed it might be a simple calculus but I don't see how. If you had just hints to help me that would be fair.

Moreover I would like to check wether [tex] \square = \frac{\partial_\mu (\sqrt{-g}g^\mu^\nu)\partial_\nu}{\sqrt{-g}}[/tex] as I found or [tex] \square = \frac{\partial_\mu\sqrt{-g}g^\mu^\nu\partial_\nu}{\sqrt{-g}}[/tex] as I read into one reference.


Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
well latex doesn't semm to work pretty well with me...
 
  • #3
◻Φ = (1/√-g)(∂μ(√-g gμννΦ))
 
  • #4
thanks.
But the more important was how I can prove the first equation about the riemann tensor.

it lacks a[tex]\delta g{\mu \nu}[/tex] on the right member of the first equation. But however I think I can manage now.

and you should read [tex](\nabla_\mu \nabla_\nu -g_{\mu\nu}\square)B [/tex]

but I found it
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Proving Lagrangian EOM with Non-minimal Coupling

What is a Lagrangian equation of motion (EOM)?

A Lagrangian equation of motion (EOM) is a mathematical equation that describes the motion of a physical system in terms of its Lagrangian function. It is a fundamental concept in classical mechanics and is used to predict the behavior of systems ranging from simple particles to complex systems such as planets and galaxies.

What is non-minimal coupling in the context of Lagrangian EOMs?

Non-minimal coupling refers to the inclusion of additional terms in the Lagrangian function that describe the interaction between different components of a physical system. These terms can account for interactions such as electromagnetism, gravity, or other forces, and are necessary for accurately describing the behavior of systems with multiple components.

Why is it important to prove Lagrangian EOMs with non-minimal coupling?

Proving Lagrangian EOMs with non-minimal coupling allows for a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of physical systems. It allows scientists to predict the behavior of complex systems and study the effects of different forces and interactions on the system's motion.

How do scientists prove Lagrangian EOMs with non-minimal coupling?

Scientists use mathematical techniques, such as variational calculus, to derive the Lagrangian EOMs for a given physical system. This involves identifying the relevant forces and interactions and incorporating them into the Lagrangian function, then applying the Euler-Lagrange equations to solve for the equations of motion.

What are some applications of Lagrangian EOMs with non-minimal coupling?

Lagrangian EOMs with non-minimal coupling are used in a wide range of fields, including classical mechanics, electromagnetism, and quantum mechanics. They are essential for understanding the behavior of complex systems and are used in various applications, such as predicting the motion of planets, studying the behavior of particles in accelerators, and developing new technologies such as quantum computing.

Similar threads

Back
Top