- #1
spaghetti3451
- 1,344
- 34
For a ##\phi^{3}## quantum field theory, the interaction term is ##\displaystyle{\frac{g}{3!}\phi^{3}}##, where ##g## is the coupling constant.
The mass dimension of the coupling constant ##g## is ##1##, which means that ##\displaystyle{\frac{g}{E}}## is dimensionless.
Therefore, ##\displaystyle{\frac{g}{3!}\phi^{3}}## is a small pertubation at high energies ##E \gg g##, but a large perturbation at low energies ##E \ll g##.
Terms with this behavior are called relevant because they’re most relevant at low energies.
However, I do not understand why the interaction term is called relevant if we cannot use perturbation theory at low energies (where the term ##\displaystyle{\frac{g}{3!}\phi^{3}}## is a large pertubation). Is it because quantum field theory is only applicable in the relativistic limit, where ##E \gg g## and the perturbation is small ?
The mass dimension of the coupling constant ##g## is ##1##, which means that ##\displaystyle{\frac{g}{E}}## is dimensionless.
Therefore, ##\displaystyle{\frac{g}{3!}\phi^{3}}## is a small pertubation at high energies ##E \gg g##, but a large perturbation at low energies ##E \ll g##.
Terms with this behavior are called relevant because they’re most relevant at low energies.
However, I do not understand why the interaction term is called relevant if we cannot use perturbation theory at low energies (where the term ##\displaystyle{\frac{g}{3!}\phi^{3}}## is a large pertubation). Is it because quantum field theory is only applicable in the relativistic limit, where ##E \gg g## and the perturbation is small ?