Representation equivalent to a unitary one

In summary, the conversation is discussing the equivalence of a representation \rho of a group G and a unitary representation of G on an inner product space V. One person is looking for a good source to provide a proof for this and another person mentions that it only applies to finite groups, but can also be extended to compact Lie groups. The conversation then specifically mentions SO(3) as an example.
  • #1
Yoran91
37
0
Hey guys,

How come a representation [itex]\rho[/itex] of a group [itex]G[/itex] is always equivalent to a unitary representation of [itex]G[/itex] on some (inner product) space [itex]V[/itex] ?

Can anyone provide a good source (book, preferably) which states a proof?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think it's only true for finite groups in general. You keep your representation and just define an inner product:
[tex] \left< u, v \right> = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \left< \rho(g) u, \rho(g) v \right> [/tex]

And it's clear that this inner product is invariant under multiplying u and v by any [itex] \rho(h) [/itex] because the right hand side will still end up being the sum over all group elements of [itex] \rho(gh)[/itex] which still gives every [itex] \rho(g) [/itex] once.

If you had a compact Lie group or something you could do the same thing with integrating over the group
 
  • #3
Ok, so what if I had [itex]SO(3)[/itex] ? It's supposed to hold for this group, but I can't seem to find a source (other than the lecture notes I'm using)
 

FAQ: Representation equivalent to a unitary one

What is a representation equivalent to a unitary one?

A representation equivalent to a unitary one is a mathematical concept that refers to the similarity between two different representations of the same physical system. Specifically, it means that the two representations are related by a unitary transformation, which preserves the inner product and therefore the physical properties of the system.

How are representations equivalent to a unitary one used in science?

Representations equivalent to a unitary one are used in a variety of scientific disciplines, including quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, and group theory. They are particularly useful in describing the symmetries and transformations of physical systems, as well as in calculating physical observables and predicting the behavior of particles or waves.

Can a non-unitary representation be equivalent to a unitary one?

No, a non-unitary representation cannot be equivalent to a unitary one. This is because non-unitary transformations do not preserve the inner product and therefore do not accurately represent the physical properties of a system. In order for two representations to be equivalent, they must both be unitary.

Are there any real-world applications of representations equivalent to a unitary one?

Yes, there are many real-world applications of representations equivalent to a unitary one. For example, they are used in quantum computing, where they help to encode and manipulate information in quantum states. They are also used in particle physics to describe the symmetries and interactions of elementary particles.

What are the advantages of using representations equivalent to a unitary one?

One of the main advantages of using representations equivalent to a unitary one is that they accurately preserve the physical properties of a system, making them useful for predicting and understanding the behavior of physical systems. Additionally, they have a wide range of applications in various scientific fields, making them a valuable tool for scientists and researchers.

Similar threads

Back
Top