Should I Choose Nanotechnology or Physics?

In summary, the conversation discusses the speaker's love for physics and engineering and their interest in molecular engineering/nanotechnology. They are seeking advice on which field to choose and express concerns about potentially missing out on certain aspects of physics or being limited in their creativity if they choose engineering. The conversation also mentions the interdisciplinary nature of nanotechnology and suggests that the speaker should follow their passion and not worry too much about future employment. They also provide a resource for the speaker to explore different lectures related to nanotechnology.
  • #1
Jonnyb42
186
0
I absolutely love physics, and I absolutely love engineering. The engineering field I would choose if I do engineering will be molecular engineering/nanotechnology, because I think its awesome, and it is going to be a very powerful technology in the near future. (If I chose physics, I would like to be a theoretical physicist!)

So I was just hoping to find some useful advice as to which I should choose.

I am afraid that if I choose engineering, I will be forced to ignore some physics, (which really makes me cringe. I want to learn ALL physics and ALL corresponding mathematics because I love it all!) But on the other hand I am afraid if I choose Physics, I will not get to create awesome things and/or life may be boring at times.

Thanks for any advice ahead of time!

Jonny
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Nanotechnology is not a subfield of engineering. Many different roads -- including physics -- will lead you there.
 
  • #3
i don't know about US... but in here in Europe we have

Physics with Nanoscale Physics MSci
UCAS code: F392
 
  • #4
Hi,Well, I would suggest that you do what you love most.
As has been mentioned earlier, the word nano is rather big & interdiscplinary. But it still mostly revolves around Physics.

For example, Computational topics in nanotech = computational + theoretical physics.
Experimental Nanotech = experimental physics + some chemistry/materials science

So again, do what you love most, & don't think too much about future employment etc...

You can have a look at:

http://www.nanohub.org"

If features some cool lectures (but remember, this is a selection, not all fields).

And if you choose Physics, it is not neccessarily that you will be become theoretical physicst, you can do both theoretical & experimental physics (this is very very close to Engineering).

Regarding Engineering schools, yes, they do tend to ignore the details (depending on the topic, e.g. in Semiconductor & physics of Nanoelectronics which is a typical topic for Electrical Engineering these days, you can't really skip the physical details).

Note: before selecting what to do, have a look at the lectures offered for the course and their content.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5


I understand your passion for both physics and engineering, and I commend you for wanting to learn all aspects of these fields. Both nanotechnology and physics are incredibly exciting and rapidly advancing fields, and it ultimately comes down to your personal interests and career goals.

If you are drawn to the hands-on aspect of creating and developing new technologies, then nanotechnology may be the right choice for you. It combines principles from various disciplines, including physics, chemistry, and engineering, to design and manipulate materials at the nanoscale. This field has huge potential for innovation and has already made significant contributions to areas such as medicine, energy, and electronics.

On the other hand, if you have a love for theoretical concepts and want to delve deeper into understanding the fundamental laws of the universe, then physics may be the better fit. As a theoretical physicist, you would use mathematical models and calculations to explain and predict the behavior of matter and energy. This field has led to groundbreaking discoveries and advancements in areas such as quantum mechanics, relativity, and cosmology.

Ultimately, it is important to choose a field that aligns with your interests and goals. Keep in mind that both nanotechnology and physics are interdisciplinary fields, and you may have the opportunity to incorporate aspects of both into your studies and research. It is also worth considering that your interests may change as you learn more and gain experience in either field.

I would recommend exploring both fields further, perhaps through internships or research opportunities, to get a better understanding of the day-to-day work and potential career paths. Whichever path you choose, I have no doubt that you will make valuable contributions to the scientific community. Best of luck in your decision!
 

FAQ: Should I Choose Nanotechnology or Physics?

What is the difference between nanotechnology and physics?

Nanotechnology is a field of science that studies and manipulates matter on an incredibly small scale, typically at the nanometer level. Physics, on the other hand, is a broad field of science that deals with the study of matter, energy, and their interactions on a larger scale.

How does nanotechnology relate to physics?

Nanotechnology is a subset of physics, specifically in the area of condensed matter physics. This means that principles and theories from physics are used to understand and develop nanoscale technologies.

Can nanotechnology replace physics in the future?

No, nanotechnology cannot replace physics as it is a subfield of physics and relies on its principles and theories. Nanotechnology may continue to advance and have a significant impact on various industries, but it will always be rooted in physics.

Is nanotechnology more important than physics?

Both nanotechnology and physics are important fields of science, and they complement each other. While nanotechnology allows us to manipulate matter on a smaller scale, physics provides the fundamental understanding of how matter behaves at that scale. Both are crucial for advancements in technology and scientific discoveries.

What are the potential drawbacks of nanotechnology compared to physics?

One of the main drawbacks of nanotechnology is the potential environmental and health risks associated with manipulating matter at such a small scale. Physics, on the other hand, has been studied for centuries and has a more established understanding of potential risks and how to mitigate them. Additionally, nanotechnology is a relatively new field and still has many unknowns, while physics has a more established foundation of knowledge and theories.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
621
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top