Should I Take Insane Physics Classes or Focus on Math First?

  • Thread starter HungryChemist
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation revolves around the speaker's concerns about taking upper division E&M, Classical Mechanics, and Quantum Mechanics at the same time and whether it is too difficult. They also ask for opinions on whether they should take upper division linear algebra before QM and whether one year of mathematical methods classes is enough. Recommendations are made for the speaker to arm themselves with strong mathematical skills before tackling these physics courses. It is suggested that taking classical mechanics before E&M is a common approach and that learning mathematics before physics is advantageous. There is also a mention of a recommended book for further guidance.
  • #1
HungryChemist
143
0
Hello, I am sorry to bore you for another thread like this...But I at least I am not posting this on 'General Physics' threads. Soon, I will be taking upper division E&M and Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics. So people said they are 'insane' classes and taking all three of them at the same time is like killing yourself. Is that really true? Well what do you think of that?

Another question is...my friend told me that I should take upper division linear algebra before I start taking Quantum Mechanics but I can't really trust him. What do you think of that?

One last question, I know I will be taking one year of Mathematical Methords classes (for it is required as a physics major), But I am thinking that's just not enough math. So same friend I mentioned above told me that I should take Real Analysis but I can't trust him. I want to take Advanced Calculus instead of Real Analysis but what do you think of that?

Please, end my misery.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are no simple answers because we have no idea what your abilities, previous coursework, and ambitions are. Also - things are kind of different from college to college.

I do think that 2 classes of upper-division physics each term (or semester) is plenty for the average student.

You should know some linear algebra for QM, but if you've taken a freshman or sophomore-level course that already covered eigenvectors, then you should be fine. Real analysis will not be useful for undergrad physics per se, but is worth learning for its own sake. I have no idea what you mean by Advanced Calculus, but if that means Calculus III (multivariable and vector calculus) - then you definitely need to know this for your physics courses, before you learn real analysis.

What kind of physics program do you have at your school? There should be some guidelines/requirements somewhere out there. Isn't there anyone in your physics dept to talk to, like a professor?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
HungryChemist said:
Hello, I am sorry to bore you for another thread like this...But I at least I am not posting this on 'General Physics' threads. Soon, I will be taking upper division E&M and Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics. So people said they are 'insane' classes and taking all three of them at the same time is like killing yourself. Is that really true? Well what do you think of that?

Another question is...my friend told me that I should take upper division linear algebra before I start taking Quantum Mechanics but I can't really trust him. What do you think of that?

One last question, I know I will be taking one year of Mathematical Methords classes (for it is required as a physics major), But I am thinking that's just not enough math. So same friend I mentioned above told me that I should take Real Analysis but I can't trust him. I want to take Advanced Calculus instead of Real Analysis but what do you think of that?

Please, end my misery.

Well, I'll let you be a bore if you will permit me to do the same. I will be VERY tacky here and will suggest to you that you read my essay that is being described in the Sticky. One of the chapters is exactly what you are asking: mathematical preparations.

QM and especially E&M (if you're taking this at the level of Griffith) will be mathematically challenging. In fact, many students could not see the forrest due to the trees, i.e. they lose track of the physics because they get stuck with the math. It is imperative that you arm yourself with the math so that you do not end up learning the math at the same time as you are trying to learn the physics.

.. and for heavens sake, get that book that I highly recommend. You can thank me later when you get your degree... :)

Zz.
 
  • #4
I'm presently taking E&M (griffiths), Thermodynamics, and Quantum II (shankar) and it's a neverending nightmare of more homework. I wish I had put one off. As classical mechanics is definitely more complicated & mathematically intense than therm, I can honestly recommend waiting on at least one. In fact, taking classical mechanics before E&M is pretty standard (I think) and will give you a solid once over in vector calculus - it gets pretty thick in E&M.

Learning mathematics before physics is definitely a plus, do it if you can.

Hope this helps
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Advanced calculus is like analysis from what I understand, basically you go back over Calc 1-3 and prove everything and don't bother computing things. It is to calculus what computational linear algebra is to proof based linear algebra. It is a 3 course sequence just like calculus.
 

FAQ: Should I Take Insane Physics Classes or Focus on Math First?

What is "Tell me What to do Now"?

"Tell me What to do Now" is a phrase commonly used to express a desire for guidance or direction in a particular situation.

Why do people ask "Tell me What to do Now"?

People often ask "Tell me What to do Now" when they are faced with a problem or decision and are feeling unsure or overwhelmed. They may be seeking advice, suggestions, or a clear course of action.

Who typically asks "Tell me What to do Now"?

Anyone can ask "Tell me What to do Now", but it is often used by individuals who are in a position of needing guidance or assistance, such as students, employees, or those seeking help in personal relationships.

Is "Tell me What to do Now" an effective way to solve problems?

As a scientist, I cannot definitively say whether or not "Tell me What to do Now" is an effective way to solve problems. However, seeking advice and guidance from others can often provide valuable insights and perspectives that may lead to a solution.

How can I respond to someone who asks "Tell me What to do Now"?

There are a few ways to respond to someone who asks "Tell me What to do Now". You can offer your own suggestions and advice, ask clarifying questions to better understand the situation, or encourage the person to think critically and come up with their own solutions. Ultimately, the best response will depend on the individual and the specific situation at hand.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top