Simple surface integration blues {again}

In summary, the conversation revolved around discussing surface integrals and a specific formula for calculating them. The question at hand was to evaluate a surface integral on a portion of a plane in the first octant, with a given function. There was a discrepancy between the official solution and the solution calculated by the individual, which was later found to be due to incorrect limits of integration. The conversation then moved on to discussing the theory of iterated integrals and using polar coordinates to solve a similar problem. However, it was noted that the integral cannot be expressed through elementary functions and is connected to a complete elliptic integral.
  • #1
brendan_foo
65
0
Hi there,

I'm still reading on about surface integrals and stuff, and I've arrived at a formula that goes like this {based on plane projection methods} :

[tex] \iint_S G(x,y,z) dS = \iint_R G(x,y,z) \sqrt{1 + \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}}[/tex]

So this is the question at hand :

Evaluate the surface integral : [itex] \iint_S G(x,y,z) dS [/itex]

where S is the portion of the plane [itex] x + y + z = 1 [/itex] in the first octant, and [itex] G(x,y,z) = z [/itex]

So, finding the partial derivatives etc.. i arrive at :

[tex]\sqrt{3}\int_0^1 \int_0^1 z dx dy[/tex] which is equivalent to : [tex]\sqrt{3}\int_0^1 \int_0^1 (1 - x - y) dx dy[/tex]...I chose the limits for dx and dy as so...

x + y + z = 1... in the x plane... y+z = 0 thus x = 1, y = 0, and the same reasoning for y...

Computing this i get :

[tex]\sqrt{3}\int_0^1 (1 - \frac{1}{2} - y) dy = \sqrt{3}\left[ y - \frac{y}{2} - \frac{y^2}{2} \right]_{0}^{1} = 0[/tex] if I am not mistaken..

The official solution however is [tex] \frac{\sqrt{3}}{6}[/tex]

Help :( :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
brendan_foo said:
Hi there,

I'm still reading on about surface integrals and stuff, and I've arrived at a formula that goes like this {based on plane projection methods} :

[tex] \iint_S G(x,y,z) dS = \iint_R G(x,y,z) \sqrt{1 + \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}}[/tex]

Well, actually, that should be
[tex] \iint_S G(x,y,z) dS = \iint_R G(x,y,z) \sqrt{1 + \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}}dx dy[/tex]


So this is the question at hand :

Evaluate the surface integral : [itex] \iint_S G(x,y,z) dS [/itex]

where S is the portion of the plane [itex] x + y + z = 1 [/itex] in the first octant, and [itex] G(x,y,z) = z [/itex]

So, finding the partial derivatives etc.. i arrive at :

[tex]\sqrt{3}\int_0^1 \int_0^1 z dx dy[/tex] which is equivalent to : [tex]\sqrt{3}\int_0^1 \int_0^1 (1 - x - y) dx dy[/tex]...I chose the limits for dx and dy as so...

x + y + z = 1... in the x plane... y+z = 0 thus x = 1, y = 0, and the same reasoning for y...

Computing this i get :

[tex]\sqrt{3}\int_0^1 (1 - \frac{1}{2} - y) dy = \sqrt{3}\left[ y - \frac{y}{2} - \frac{y^2}{2} \right]_{0}^{1} = 0[/tex] if I am not mistaken..

The official solution however is [tex] \frac{\sqrt{3}}{6}[/tex]

Help :( :(

Here's how I like to do problems like this: the surface is given by x+ y+ z= 1 and we can think of that as a "level surface" of f(x,y,z)= x+ y+ z. The gradient of f: i+ j+ k is normal to that and its length is the differential of area. I like to think of it as the "vector differential of area" . In this particular case, the differential of area, projected onto the xy-plane, is
[itex]\sqrt{3}dxdy[/itex], just as you have.


HOWEVER, you have calculated the limits of integration wrong. The plane x+ y+ z= 1, in the first quadrant, is a triangle with vertices at (1,0,0), (0,1,0), and (0,0,1). Projecting down to the xy-plane, we get a triangle with vertices at (0,0), (1,0), and (0,1). Of course, the sides of that triangle are the x-axis, the y-axis, and the line x+ y= 1.

If we choose to order the integrals with the x-integral outside, then x ranges from 0 to 1, just as you say. BUT, FOR EACH X, y ranges from 0 up to y= 1-x, the slant line. Your integral should be
[tex]\sqrt{3}\int_{x=0}^{1}\int_{y= 0}^{1-x}(1-x-y)dydx[/tex]

Integrate that and see what you get.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Saviour...I suppose I should polish up on the theory of iterated integrals...The book I currently have contains a lot of mathematical language, such of that a mere engineering student finds a bit much on first glance.. Could someone just brief me up on the theory of these iterated integrals in which a limit is a function.. I know its analogous to partial derivatives, but that's as far as i go :D

Cheers guys, another triumph! :D:D


Edit : Just to get the ball rolling, the next question is of the same form; but :

[tex] G(x,y,z) = \frac{1}{1 + 4(x^2 + y^2)}[/tex] and [tex] z = x^2 + y^2 [/tex]
from Z = 0 to Z = 1; If someone could just push me in the right direction, regarding limits and whether or not i should convert to polar coordinates.

Thanks again :biggrin: :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Yes,the surface [itex] z=x^{2}+y^{2} [/tex] is the of a rotation paraboloid round the Oz axis,with the lowest point:the origin of the cartesian coordinate system.It's projection on the Oxy plane is a disk of radius 1.
Use polar coordinates in the Oxy plane.The limits of integration will be:
[tex] 0\leq \rho\leq 1;0\leq \phi\leq 2\pi [/tex]
The integrals won't look very pretty,though...

Daniel.
 
  • #5
I wish there was a real time chat facility :biggrin:
 
  • #6
:( this integral is pretty tricky, any takers?! I've got the numerical solution but my answers just won't agree...sigh :frown:
 
  • #7
It's this "baby":
[tex] \int_{0}^{1} d\rho\int_{0}^{+\pi} d\phi \frac{\sqrt{1+2\rho(\sin\phi+\cos\phi)}}{1+4\rho^{2}} [/tex]
,which i guess it cannot be expressed through elementary functions.At least the integral of the angle seems to be put in connection with a complete elliptic integral of the second kind of Legendre.

Daniel.
 
  • #8
Man that's mighty unfair...I arrived at the same integral as you've stated but evaluating it was somewhat nasty and led no where really.. Ah well, onto the next I suppose.. Thanks to everyone though, the aid is much appreciated.

All the best!
:biggrin:
 

FAQ: Simple surface integration blues {again}

1. What is surface integration blues?

Surface integration blues refers to the difficulty in integrating or combining different data sets or information from different sources, particularly when dealing with complex surfaces or terrain.

2. How is surface integration blues relevant in scientific research?

Surface integration blues is relevant in scientific research as it is often necessary to integrate data from various sources in order to gain a complete understanding of a particular phenomenon or system. This is especially true when studying natural surfaces, such as the Earth's topography or the ocean floor.

3. What are some common challenges in surface integration blues?

Some common challenges in surface integration blues include differences in data formats, discrepancies in measurement techniques, and varying levels of accuracy and precision in the collected data. Additionally, dealing with complex surfaces can present challenges in accurately representing and integrating the data.

4. How do scientists overcome surface integration blues?

Scientists can overcome surface integration blues by carefully selecting and validating data sources, using standardized data formats and measurement techniques, and employing advanced data processing and visualization techniques. Collaborating with experts in different fields can also help to overcome integration challenges.

5. What are some potential applications of surface integration blues in scientific research?

Surface integration blues has many potential applications in scientific research, such as studying climate change through integrating data from different sources, creating detailed maps of the ocean floor by combining data from various surveys, and understanding the formation and evolution of mountains by integrating geological and topographical data.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top