Solve for x- the inequality of quadratic

In summary, to solve for x in the inequality \frac{2x}{x^2-9}\le\frac{1}{x+2}, we first note that x^2-9 and x+2 should not be equal to zero. We then convert the original inequality to (2x)(x+2)\le(x^2-9) and split into cases depending on the signs of these factors. We can then rearrange and use the Discriminant to determine the regions where the cubic expression is greater than or less than zero, and combine these with the initial constraints to find the final solution.
  • #1
Sumedh
62
0
Solve for x-- the inequality of quadratic

Homework Statement


Solve [tex]\frac{2x}{x^2-9}\le\frac{1}{x+2}[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution


[tex]x^2-9\not=0[/tex]
.'. [tex]x\in R-\{-3,3\}[/tex]
and

[tex]x+2\not=0[/tex]
.'. [tex]x\in R-\{-2\}[/tex]

then converting the original inequality to
[tex](2x)(x+2)\le(x^2-9)[/tex]
[tex](2x^2+4x)(-x^2+9)\le 0[/tex]
[tex](x^2+4x+9)\le 0[/tex]
As Discriminant <0 it has no real roots
so how to do further...




My assumptions:-
[tex]x^2-9[/tex]should not be zero
[tex]x+2[/tex]should also not be zero

Are my assumptions right?
Any help will be highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Sumedh said:
then converting the original inequality to
[tex](2x)(x+2)\le(x^2-9)[/tex]

I see what you did here, but it's not correct. It's not true that

[tex]\frac{a}{b}\leq \frac{c}{d}[/tex]

implies that [itex]ad\leq bc[/itex]. For example

[tex]\frac{1}{-1}\leq \frac{1}{1}[/tex]

but it's not true that [itex]1\leq -1[/itex]. The problem is of course that negative numbers reverse the inequality sign.

How do we do such a thing then?? Well, first we move everything to the left side of the equation:

[tex]\frac{2x}{x^2-9}-\frac{1}{x+2}\leq 0[/tex]

and now you must try to add these fractions.
 
  • #3


Sumedh said:

Homework Statement


Solve [tex]\frac{2x}{x^2-9}\le\frac{1}{x+2}[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution


[tex]x^2-9\not=0[/tex]
.'. [tex]x\in R-\{-3,3\}[/tex]
and

[tex]x+2\not=0[/tex]
.'. [tex]x\in R-\{-2\}[/tex]

then converting the original inequality to
[tex](2x)(x+2)\le(x^2-9)[/tex]
[tex](2x^2+4x)(-x^2+9)\le 0[/tex]
[tex](x^2+4x+9)\le 0[/tex]
As Discriminant <0 it has no real roots
so how to do further...




My assumptions:-
[tex]x^2-9[/tex]should not be zero
[tex]x+2[/tex]should also not be zero

Are my assumptions right?
Any help will be highly appreciated.

In general, if a <= b we have a*c <= b*c if c > 0 and a*c >= b*c if c < 0. Thus, if x+1 > 0 you have 2x(x+2)/(x^2-9) <= 1 and if x+2 < 0 you have the opposite inequality. Now, in each case, look at whether x^2-9 is positive or negative.

RGV
 
  • #4


[tex]\frac{2x}{x^2-9}\le\frac{1}{x+2}[/tex]

I often prefer to multiply by a square to avoid splitting into too many +/- cases. It's a compromise though, between getting a higher order system versus less case splitting.

[tex]\frac{2x (x+2)^2}{x^2-9}\le x+2[/tex]

I'll split into cases for the (x^2-9) factor to keep the order of the system under control.

[tex]2x (x+2)^2 \le (x+2) (x^2-9)\,\,\,\, : \,\, |x|>3[/tex]
[tex]2x (x+2)^2 \ge (x+2) (x^2-9)\,\,\,\, : \,\, |x|<3[/tex]

Now we've got a cubic, but one factor is already out, so rearrange without re-absorbing the "outed" factor.

[tex] (x^2 + 4x + 9)(x+2) \le 0\,\,\,\, : \,\, |x|>3[/tex]
[tex] (x^2 + 4x + 9)(x+2) \ge 0\,\,\,\, : \,\, |x|<3[/tex]

Here we have a cubic with just one real root at x=-2, so it's pretty easy to deduce where it's greater or less than zero. Just combine those regions (intersection) with the |x|>3 and |x|<3 constraints and make sure you omit the singular points that weren't in the original domain (-2).
 
  • #5


Thank you very much.
 

FAQ: Solve for x- the inequality of quadratic

How do I solve a quadratic inequality?

To solve a quadratic inequality, you must first rewrite it in standard form, where one side is equal to zero. Then, you can either graph the inequality or use algebraic methods such as factoring, the quadratic formula, or completing the square to find the solutions.

What is the difference between solving a quadratic equation and a quadratic inequality?

The main difference between solving a quadratic equation and a quadratic inequality is that an inequality has multiple possible solutions, while an equation has only one solution. Additionally, when solving an inequality, you must consider the direction of the inequality (greater than or less than) when graphing or solving algebraically.

Can a quadratic inequality have no solutions?

Yes, a quadratic inequality can have no solutions. This occurs when the graph of the quadratic function does not intersect with the x-axis, indicating that there are no values of x that satisfy the inequality.

How do I know if the solutions to a quadratic inequality are inclusive or exclusive?

The solutions to a quadratic inequality are inclusive (represented by a bracket [ ]) if the inequality includes the equal sign (≤ or ≥). The solutions are exclusive (represented by a parenthesis ( )) if the inequality does not include the equal sign (< or >).

Can I use the quadratic formula to solve a quadratic inequality?

Yes, you can use the quadratic formula to solve a quadratic inequality. However, you will need to set one side of the inequality equal to zero and then use the quadratic formula to find the x-intercepts. From there, you can determine the solutions based on the direction of the inequality.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
865
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
844
Back
Top