- #1
KrisOhn
- 195
- 2
I've been thinking of this for the past couple days and I can't find an answer myself, so I figured I would come here.
The theory of relativity states that the speed of light, c, is the highest speed something can possibly travel at with respect to an observer.
To me this means that from a stationary observer, you cannot travel faster than the speed of light, but say you were traveling at .9c and there was another observer traveling next to you at 0.9 your speed. In my mind you would be able to accelerate to near the speed of light from that observer traveling next to you, but at that point your speed with respect to the original observer would be much greater than c.
A way of thinking of this is using solar sails. The speed of light is constant from all reference frames so using a solar sail you should be able to continually accelerate since the speed of light never slows down no matter how fast you go.
In my mind this is possible, it's just that at the second speed, with respect to the original observer, you wouldn't be able to measure your velocity because the information cannot transfer between the two. This essentially is the thought that a speed greater than c is possible, but cannot be measured, so it's a moot point.
My question is, am I correct in thinking this? If not, why? And, if I am, as you accelerate up to near c for the secondary observer (accelerating past c for the stationary one) what would happen to the moving source relative to the stationary observer? Would it just disappear? Or would it look to continue getting closer and closer to c?
The theory of relativity states that the speed of light, c, is the highest speed something can possibly travel at with respect to an observer.
To me this means that from a stationary observer, you cannot travel faster than the speed of light, but say you were traveling at .9c and there was another observer traveling next to you at 0.9 your speed. In my mind you would be able to accelerate to near the speed of light from that observer traveling next to you, but at that point your speed with respect to the original observer would be much greater than c.
A way of thinking of this is using solar sails. The speed of light is constant from all reference frames so using a solar sail you should be able to continually accelerate since the speed of light never slows down no matter how fast you go.
In my mind this is possible, it's just that at the second speed, with respect to the original observer, you wouldn't be able to measure your velocity because the information cannot transfer between the two. This essentially is the thought that a speed greater than c is possible, but cannot be measured, so it's a moot point.
My question is, am I correct in thinking this? If not, why? And, if I am, as you accelerate up to near c for the secondary observer (accelerating past c for the stationary one) what would happen to the moving source relative to the stationary observer? Would it just disappear? Or would it look to continue getting closer and closer to c?