Statics Problem: Solve for Magnitude of QR & PR

  • Thread starter CoasterGT
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Statics
In summary: My first answer was 195N and my second was 94NAh. I was getting the same number when I used the cosine rule though. So my answer would be that the cosine rule is correct.
  • #1
CoasterGT
6
0

Homework Statement


See the attachment


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am pretty lost where to start... no relationship pops out at me to help in finding the components of the PR and QR to find the magnitude of QR and PR. I know lots of angles, but don't see how I can quite relate them to the 250 N force. If anyone could help me pointed in the right direction, it would be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • statics.gif
    statics.gif
    7.6 KB · Views: 509
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Find the torques (Moments) from the points where the rods attach to the wall.
Draw in the forces and directions acting on the rods where they meet the wall.
 
  • #3
Is there another way? This problem is in the chapter before moments and such are discussed. This chapter just deals with vectors and their components.
 
  • #4
CoasterGT said:
Is there another way? This problem is in the chapter before moments and such are discussed. This chapter just deals with vectors and their components.

Dealing with PR first... draw the component of the 250N force along PR, and perpendicular to PR... you have a right triangle formed by these 2 componenets and the 250N force... analyze that right triangle... do you see how to use the angles given?
 
  • #5
Alright, so for PR, I took 250/sqrt(2) to get approx 177 since I formed a 45-45-90 triangle.

Then, to solve for QR, I took 177/sqrt(2) = 125 to get the bottom of a new triangle I made, with QR as the hypotenuse. Then took 125/cos(70) to get the value of 365.5 N for QR.

Is what I did correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
CoasterGT said:
Alright, so for PR, I took 250/sqrt(2) to get approx 177 since I formed a 45-45-90 triangle.

Then, to solve for QR, I took 177/sqrt(2) = 125 to get the bottom of a new triangle I made, with QR as the hypotenuse. Then took 125/cos(70) to get the value of 365.5 N for QR.

Is what I did correct?

The part of PR looks correct. But the QR part doesn't. Do exactly the same thing you did with the PR part... the only thing that is different is the angle.

draw the component of the 250N force along QR, and perpendicular to QR... you have a right triangle formed by these 2 componenets and the 250N force... analyze that right triangle...
 
  • #7
I started off with the knowledge that the vertical components of PR and QR had to equal 250.

So from that, I planned on drawing a vector diagram where this was reflected. I flipped PR vertically, and then joined it onto the bottom of QR to make a triangle, with a vertical side on the right of magnitude 250.

Then I worked out interior angles, and used the sine rule.

My answers were:
QR = 195N
PR = 94N
 
  • #8
Ah, after reading BlackWyvern's post I see I was completely wrong. CoasterGT, disregard my previous comments.

So a force acting along PR added to a force acting along QR must add to 250N acting downwards... I'm getting different numbers though.
 

FAQ: Statics Problem: Solve for Magnitude of QR & PR

What is the definition of "Statics"?

Statics is a branch of mechanics that deals with the analysis of forces and their effects on rigid bodies at rest or in a state of constant motion.

How do you solve for the magnitude of QR and PR in a statics problem?

To solve for the magnitude of QR and PR, you will need to use the principles of equilibrium. This involves analyzing the forces acting on the body and ensuring that the sum of all forces in the x and y directions is equal to zero.

What information is needed to solve for the magnitude of QR and PR in a statics problem?

To solve for the magnitude of QR and PR, you will need to know the position, direction, and magnitude of all the forces acting on the body. Additionally, you will need to know the geometry of the body, including the length of QR and PR.

How do you determine if a statics problem is solvable?

A statics problem is solvable if the principles of equilibrium can be applied. This means that the forces acting on the body must be in balance, and the body must be in a state of rest or constant motion.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when solving for the magnitude of QR and PR in a statics problem?

Some common mistakes to avoid when solving for the magnitude of QR and PR include neglecting to include all forces acting on the body, using incorrect values for the forces or geometry of the body, and not checking for equilibrium in both the x and y directions.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top