Stone's Height Above Window Question

In summary, Marlon said that the average velocity is ZERO because the inital and final velocity are equal to each other. Daniel said that the average velocity is the velocity when the object is back on the ground.
  • #1
jen333
59
0
hey, I'm having a bit trouble solving this physics question! :mad:
so if anyone can help me, here it is:
A stone is thrown up past a window. The stone requires 0.20s to completely pass by the 1.4m tall window. How high above the window did the stone go? I'm aware that the average velocity is 7.0m/s using the formula Vave=d/t. However, from there...i'm clueless.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
jen333 said:
hey, I'm having a bit trouble solving this physics question! :mad:
so if anyone can help me, here it is:
A stone is thrown up past a window. The stone requires 0.20s to completely pass by the 1.4m tall window. How high above the window did the stone go? Average velocity is 7.0m/s

You can use :
[tex]v = v_0 -gt[/tex]
[tex]y = y_0 + v_0t -g \frac{t^2}{2}[/tex]

The v_0 and y_0 are the initial velocity and position and the latter is equal to zero in this case. You will need to determin the initial velocity v_0...this is easy because you kow that you have travelloed 1.4m in 0.2 seconds. Put this into the second equation and solve for v_0

In order to determin the height above the window, just realize that the maximal height is acquired when the velocity is 0...


What is this average velocity? If you apply the normal definition [tex]v_{average} = \frac {v_{final} - v_{initial}}{2}[/tex] you will get ZERO because the inital and final velocity are equal to each other.
Am i missing something ?

marlon
 
  • #3
Since I'm only in first level high school, i have not been aware of the formulas that were given. In terms of average velocity, i was given the formula that is was the division of distance over time, and therefore giving 7.0m/s of the stone passing the window. I am still unclear of what you are trying to say.

ps) thank you for your assistance
 
  • #4
marlon said:
What is this average velocity? If you apply the normal definition [tex]v_{average} = \frac {v_{final} - v_{initial}}{2}[/tex] you will get ZERO because the inital and final velocity are equal to each other.
Am i missing something ?
I believe jen333 was talking about the average velocity of the stone during its pass by the window (from bottom to top of window). [itex] V_{ave} = D/t = 7.0[/itex]m/s; true, but not that useful. Also, [itex] V_{ave} = (V_i + V_f)/2[/itex] for uniformly accelerated motion.
 
  • #5
:smile: Yes,use the definition for average velocity...
[tex] \langle \vec{v}\rangle_{[t_{1},t_{2}]} =:\frac{1}{t_{2}-t_{1}} \int_{t_{1}}^{t_{2}} \vec{v}(t) \ dt [/tex]

Choose [tex] t_{1}=0 ,t_{2}=t_{final} [/tex]

,where t_{final}=time from the moment of the throw until the stone reaches the climax of the trajectory...

Tell me if you get zero in this case...

Daniel.
 
  • #6
Doc Al said:
Also, [itex] V_{ave} = (V_i + V_f)/2[/itex] for uniformly accelerated motion.
Indeed, i made a mistake there. However i think the best way tosolve this is like this (i don't see another way out)

g = 9.81

so the second formula gives us

1.14 = v_0*0.2 - 9.81*0.2²/2 Solve this for V_0

Then to determin the maximal heigth

v = 0 = v_0 (which you know from above calculation) -9.81t Solve for t and plug this t-value into the second formula for y...Now you know the maximal height...then just subtract 1.14

marlon
 
  • #7
dextercioby said:
:smile: Yes,use the definition for average velocity...
[tex] \langle \vec{v}\rangle_{[t_{1},t_{2}]} =:\frac{1}{t_{2}-t_{1}} \int_{t_{1}}^{t_{2}} \vec{v}(t) \ dt [/tex]

Choose [tex] t_{1}=0 ,t_{2}=t_{final} [/tex]

Yes you will get ZERO, because in your attempt to correct me, you made a mistake yourself. You shouldn't have written v as a VECTOR. You will get ZERO because the initial and final vector for v have OPPOSITE direction and are equal in length...

To the OP : disregard dexter's post because it is both wrong and useless in this case

regards
marlon
 
  • #8
Lol...The final velocity is zero (did u read my post...?Why do you make gratuitious affirmations...?),because i chosed the t_{final} to be the moment of time at which the stone is at its climax,where the velovity is zero...



Daniel.

P.S.To the OP:disregard all posts...Mine & Marlon's included...:-p
 
  • #9
dextercioby said:
Lol...The final velocity is zero

The final velocity is NOT zero. Have you forgotten about energy conservation. The final velocity is the velocity when the object is back on the ground. This is where you went wrong.

However this is not relevant to this problem. I posted a possible way out using the formula's for y and v

marlon

now i am off, the academy awards show has begun...
 
Last edited:
  • #10
confuzzled

well, i thank everyone for their help in this physics problem, however "disregard all posts...Mine & Marlon's included..." stated by dextercioby is confusing me as i still do not know where to start in solving this problem. pleez, someone confirm a post that would definitely assist me and come to a proper answer.

thx,
jen333
 
  • #11
jen333 said:
well, i thank everyone for their help in this physics problem, however "disregard all posts...Mine & Marlon's included..." stated by dextercioby is confusing me as i still do not know where to start in solving this problem. pleez, someone confirm a post that would definitely assist me and come to a proper answer.

thx,
jen333

Jen, just look at posts 2 and 6...i practically gave the answer there

regards
marlon;
now i am really gone
 
  • #12
Thanks Marlon. I am now aware that the answer to the problem is 1.8m. if anyone received a different answer, please feel free to explain.
 
  • #13
Yes,the answer is (weirdly) correct...:approve:

Daniel.
 

FAQ: Stone's Height Above Window Question

What makes a physics problem interesting?

An interesting physics problem is one that challenges the current understanding of the laws and principles of physics, requires creative thinking and problem-solving skills, and has practical applications in the real world.

How can I approach an interesting physics problem?

To approach an interesting physics problem, it is important to first understand the fundamental concepts and principles related to the problem. Then, break down the problem into smaller, more manageable parts and use logical reasoning and critical thinking to solve each part.

Can interesting physics problems be solved using only mathematical equations?

No, solving an interesting physics problem often requires a combination of mathematical equations and physical intuition. It is important to understand the underlying physical concepts and use them to guide the mathematical calculations.

Are there any resources available to help with solving interesting physics problems?

Yes, there are many resources available including textbooks, online resources, and physics forums where you can discuss and get help from others. It is also helpful to work with a study group or a mentor who can provide guidance and support.

How can solving interesting physics problems benefit me?

Solving interesting physics problems can improve your critical thinking and problem-solving skills, deepen your understanding of physics concepts, and prepare you for future challenges in the field of science and technology. It can also be a source of satisfaction and joy to successfully solve a challenging problem.

Back
Top