That is also equal to 0. Can you explain why?

  • Thread starter 76Ahmad
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Summation
In summary, the conversation is discussing how to prove the claim \sum_{i=0}^{n}a_iz^i=(1-z)^{\binom{m}{2}}(1+z)^{\binom{m+1}{2}}, where a_i is the coefficient of z, n is the integer power of z, m is the integer power of z where it goes ++ to n, and z is a variable. The conversation also mentions the need to use derivatives and asks for clarification on the definition of a_i. The conversation ends with a discussion on how to prove that a_2, a_{m^2-2}, and a_{\frac{m^2}{2}} are the only
  • #1
76Ahmad
48
0
Prove of summation claim ??

Hi every one,,

any idea how to prove the following claim

[itex]\sum_{i=0}^{n}a_iz^i=(1-z)^{\binom{m}{2}}(1+z)^{\binom{m+1}{2}}[/itex]




i think we need to use some derivatives, may be the second derivative will help.


please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Please tell us what [itex]a_i[/itex] is, what n is, what m is and what z is.

When communicating with others it is crucial to give all the information.
 
  • #3


Yes sure,,

a_i is the coefficient of z.

m is the integer power of z where it goes ++ to n.

Thanks
 
  • #4


Sigh...

What IS [itex]a_i[/itex]??

Right now you are asking:

Prove that a+b=c, but I won't tell you what a,b and c are.

Please state the FULL problem.
 
  • #5


OK,, :)

Let


[itex]n=m^2 and\,\,\, s=\binom{m}{2}, n-s=\binom{m+1}{2}[/itex]

prove that the following claim is true

[itex]\sum_{i=0}^{n}a_iz^i=(1-z)^{\binom{m}{2}}(1+z)^{\binom{m+1}{2}}[/itex]
 
  • #6


prove that this polynomials has only 3 zero coefficient, and they are

[itex]a_2[/itex], and [itex]a_{m^2-2}[/itex], and

[itex]a_{\frac{m^2}{2}}[/itex] if m=2 mod 4.
 
  • #7


I think micromass is asking things like the structure.

For example are they real numbers? complex numbers? integers? prime integers?

Mathematicians usually use sets to describe these numbers and it will probably be beneficial for you to do the same because it will help you both in a) reading other mathematical work and b) get you thinking in the right way to do mathematics.
 
  • #8


chiro said:
I think micromass is asking things like the structure.

No, I'm just wanting to know how the [itex]a_i[/itex] are defined. Am I the only one who sees a problem with the OP?? Hmmm, I'll let others solve the question since I'm confused...
 
  • #9


76Ahmad said:
OK,, :)

Let


[itex]n=m^2 and\,\,\, s=\binom{m}{2}, n-s=\binom{m+1}{2}[/itex]

prove that the following claim is true

[itex]\sum_{i=0}^{n}a_iz^i=(1-z)^{\binom{m}{2}}(1+z)^{\binom{m+1}{2}}[/itex]

micromass said:
No, I'm just wanting to know how the [itex]a_i[/itex] are defined. Am I the only one who sees a problem with the OP?? Hmmm, I'll let others solve the question since I'm confused...

micromass, no, you aren't the only one who sees a problem.

76Ahmed, no one can help you if until you tell us what the values of the coefficients ai are.
 
  • #10


The a_i are of course the coefficients of the given polynomial in Z[z], and the question is about which of these are zero.

To prove that a_2 is zero, just use the first 3 terms in each factor, and multiply, and you get the coefficient of z2. You need to prove the identity (m 2)(m+1 2) = ((m 2) 2)+((m+1 2) 2) of binomials to get there.

There is also a, not too illuminating, combinatorial way of showing this.

The other zeros follows since the coefficients are (anti-)symmetric.

To prove that no other ai is zero may be the hard part. It may also be that you are not really asking about that.
 
  • #11


micromass + Mark44

I do not know what the is difficulty of a_i that is facing you both !
Knowing that I told you before a_i is the coefficient of z.

if you still have a problem with a_i, just put m = 3 for example.

you will get

1 + 3 z - 8 z^3 - 6 z^4 + 6 z^5 + 8 z^6 - 3 z^8 - z^9
then you see
a_0 = 1
a_1 = 3
a_2 = 0
a_3 = -8 ... a_9 = -1DID YOU GET IT.
 
  • #12


Thanks Norwegian..

I think you are right, can you explain in detail please.

you can see that
[itex]|a_2|=|a_{m^2-2}|[/itex]

so if we prove that a_2 = 0, then a_{m^2-2} is also = 0.

what about
[itex]a_{\frac{m^2}{2}}[/itex]
 

FAQ: That is also equal to 0. Can you explain why?

What is a summation claim?

A summation claim is a statement or hypothesis that suggests the sum of a series of numbers has a specific value or relationship.

How do you prove a summation claim?

To prove a summation claim, you must use mathematical techniques such as induction, substitution, or direct proof to show that the sum of the series is equal to the value or relationship stated in the claim.

What are some common methods used to prove summation claims?

Some common methods used to prove summation claims include mathematical induction, telescoping sums, and the geometric series formula. These methods rely on algebraic manipulation and pattern recognition to arrive at a solution.

What are some challenges in proving summation claims?

One challenge in proving summation claims is the complexity of the series itself. Some summation claims may involve series with thousands of terms, making it difficult to see a pattern or manipulate algebraically. Another challenge is understanding which method is most appropriate for a specific summation claim.

How do you know if a summation claim is true?

A summation claim is considered true if it can be proven using a mathematical proof, such as induction or direct proof. However, it's important to note that a claim can also be disproven if it can be shown to be false for even just one specific example or value.

Similar threads

Back
Top