- #1
modmans2ndcoming
- 150
- 0
when you consider that Coal power generates more Radioactive waste than a fully nuclear power generated grid would, it would seem that it is a better solution.
or even consider this...if we move to a hydrogen economy, would it not be better to have an centralised nuclear power facility that creates the hydrogen and can then store the spent fuel without transportation?
even then, it would seem that would be a better solution that letting radioactive particles fly through the air and polute out food everywhere.
but then if there is a fussion breakthrough (we are so close that one breakthrough in efficency would give a net output of energy) then this becomes moot.
or even consider this...if we move to a hydrogen economy, would it not be better to have an centralised nuclear power facility that creates the hydrogen and can then store the spent fuel without transportation?
even then, it would seem that would be a better solution that letting radioactive particles fly through the air and polute out food everywhere.
but then if there is a fussion breakthrough (we are so close that one breakthrough in efficency would give a net output of energy) then this becomes moot.