Uncertainty Principle and Relativity: Exploring Electron Energies in the Nucleus

In summary, the conversation is about a first year physics student asking for help with a problem involving the uncertainty principle and special relativity. The student is struggling to solve the problem and is seeking guidance from others. The conversation also touches upon the concept of ultra-relativistic particles and the calculation of kinetic energy.
  • #1
Kazuya
3
0
Hi, I'm a first year physics student at the University of Oregon and I was hoping that someone here might be able to help me with a problem I've been having.

A question on my assignment asks me to "Use the uncertainty principle to show that if an electron were present in the nucleus (r = approximately 10^-15 m), its kinetic energy (use relativity) would be hundreds of MeV. (Since such electron energies are not observed, we conclude that electrons are not present in the nucleus). [Hint: a particle can have energy as large as its uncertainty.]

Firstly, I decided to use the form of uncertainty principle (delta x)(delta p) is approximately larger than h-bar. I used (10^-15 m) as (delta x) and split (delta p) into m(delta v). I than used the rest mass of an electron (9.11x10^-31 kg) as m and attempted to solve for (delta v). [Using h-bar = 1.055x10^-34 J*s]. Unfortunately, this gave me an answer of (delta v) is approximately larger than (1.15x10^11 m/s)... which of course is much larger than c (3.00x10^8 m/s).

Already I knew there was a problem... when attempting to find K = (gamma - 1)mc^2, gamma becomes something like (382i)^-1/2. This is a definite problem because we haven't begun using non-real numbers (i) in this course yet.

Does anyone see an obvious problem with what I'm doing? Should I be using (delta E)(delta t) approximately larger than h-bar for the uncertainty principle? For my special relativity equation should I use E^2 =(p^2)(c^2) + (m^2)(c^4)?

I've spent several hours on this problem trying every imaginable route and have even come to the conclusion (incorrectly, of course) that [1+ (m^2)(c^2)] is approximately larger than 1/(2pi)^2! Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Originally posted by Kazuya
Hi, I'm a first year physics student at the University of Oregon and I was hoping that someone here might be able to help me with a problem I've been having.

A question on my assignment asks me to "Use the uncertainty principle to show that if an electron were present in the nucleus (r = approximately 10^-15 m), its kinetic energy (use relativity) would be hundreds of MeV. (Since such electron energies are not observed, we conclude that electrons are not present in the nucleus). [Hint: a particle can have energy as large as its uncertainty.]

Firstly, I decided to use the form of uncertainty principle (delta x)(delta p) is approximately larger than h-bar. I used (10^-15 m) as (delta x) and split (delta p) into m(delta v). I than used the rest mass of an electron (9.11x10^-31 kg) as m and attempted to solve for (delta v). [Using h-bar = 1.055x10^-34 J*s]. Unfortunately, this gave me an answer of (delta v) is approximately larger than (1.15x10^11 m/s)... which of course is much larger than c (3.00x10^8 m/s).

Already I knew there was a problem... when attempting to find K = (gamma - 1)mc^2, gamma becomes something like (382i)^-1/2. This is a definite problem because we haven't begun using non-real numbers (i) in this course yet.

Does anyone see an obvious problem with what I'm doing? Should I be using (delta E)(delta t) approximately larger than h-bar for the uncertainty principle? For my special relativity equation should I use E^2 =(p^2)(c^2) + (m^2)(c^4)?

I've spent several hours on this problem trying every imaginable route and have even come to the conclusion (incorrectly, of course) that [1+ (m^2)(c^2)] is approximately larger than 1/(2pi)^2! Any help is greatly appreciated.

You began well by saying that p is of the order of hbar/Δx.
Instead of finding the velocity of the electron just compare pc with mc^2. Why that? Remember that E = γmc^2 and p = γmv. So that p/E = v/c^2 and if the velocity is of the order of c, you get E is approximately equal to pc. When you put this result in the equation E^2 =(p^2)(c^2) + (m^2)(c^4), you see thatthis means that you can neglect mc^2 wrt pc. In fact there is a terminology for this. A particle is said to be ultra-relativistic if its velocity is so closed to c that it can be treated as a zero mass particle where E=pc.

In the case of ultra-relativistic, almost all the energy will be kinetic energy.

If you look at your example you have p = h/r so that Ek = hbar*c/r.
remember that the compton wavelength of the electron is given by λ = hbar/mc, you will find that Ek = λ/r*mc^2.
For the electron, &lambda is about 10^-12 m, r is about 10^-15 and mc^2 is 0.5 MeV. So you get Ek is about 500MeV.

Hope I could help
 
  • #3
Awesome =) Thanks for the help!
 

FAQ: Uncertainty Principle and Relativity: Exploring Electron Energies in the Nucleus

What is uncertainty in science?

Uncertainty in science refers to the limitations in our knowledge and understanding of a particular phenomenon or concept. It is the acknowledgement that there may be factors that we are unable to measure or predict, leading to a degree of doubt in our conclusions.

How does uncertainty impact scientific research?

Uncertainty can have a significant impact on scientific research, as it can affect the reliability and validity of our findings. It may lead to conflicting results or the need for further studies to confirm or clarify findings. Uncertainty also highlights the need for caution and careful consideration when interpreting results.

What is the theory of relativity?

The theory of relativity, developed by Albert Einstein, is a fundamental concept in physics that explains the relationship between space and time. It consists of two theories: special relativity, which deals with the laws of physics in non-accelerating frames of reference, and general relativity, which explains the effects of gravity on the fabric of space-time.

How does relativity impact our understanding of the universe?

Relativity has revolutionized our understanding of the universe by providing a new framework for understanding space, time, and gravity. It has allowed us to make predictions and observations that were previously impossible, such as the existence of black holes and the bending of light by massive objects.

What are the practical applications of relativity?

Relativity has several practical applications, including global positioning systems (GPS), which use relativity to account for the effects of time dilation on satellite clocks. It has also been used to develop new technologies, such as nuclear energy and particle accelerators. Additionally, relativity has contributed to advancements in astronomy and cosmology, allowing us to better understand the origins and structure of the universe.

Back
Top