Understanding Limits of Integration: Cartesian or Polar First?

In summary, the conversation discusses the confusion regarding which limits to use when integrating and how to switch the limits around. The expert explains that finding the correct limits is simply a matter of drawing the region and making sure the new limits give the same region. They also mention that the limits and the Jacobian are two separate matters and that it's important to have a good understanding of the region over which integration is taking place.
  • #1
tolove
164
1
I'm confused with limits of integrating and which to integrate first,

I've been getting by so far with just knowing the following,
[itex] \int_0^1\int_0^y f(x,y) dxdy = \int_0^1\int_0^{rsin\theta} f(rcos\theta,rsin\theta) rdrd\theta [/itex]

But what happens when we switch it around?
[itex] \int_0^1\int_0^{x} f(x) dydx = ...? [/itex]

Will it still be the same? That is,
[itex] = \int_0^1\int_0^{rcos\theta} f(rcos\theta,rsin\theta) rdrd\theta [/itex]

Thank you for your time!

edit: I suppose it would be, since the assignment of the particular characters x and y are arbitrary. I'm still confused since I'm not showing it explicitly. I need to review Jacobians I suppose, very short on time this weekend though.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hi tolove! :smile:
tolove said:
[itex] \int_0^1\int_0^y f(x,y) dxdy = \int_0^1\int_0^{rsin\theta} f(rcos\theta,rsin\theta) rdrd\theta [/itex]

But what happens when we switch it around?
[itex] \int_0^1\int_0^{x} f(x) dydx = ...? [/itex]

the limits and the jacobian are two separate matters

finding the correct limits is simply a question of drawing the region, and making sure the new limits give the same region

your first limits were for 0 ≤ x ≤ y ≤ 1

your second limits are for 0 ≤ y ≤ x ≤ 1 …

so how should you change them to get the same region? :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
tiny-tim said:
hi tolove! :smile:


the limits and the jacobian are two separate matters

finding the correct limits is simply a question of drawing the region, and making sure the new limits give the same region

your first limits were for 0 ≤ x ≤ y ≤ 1

your second limits are for 0 ≤ y ≤ x ≤ 1 …

so how should you change them to get the same region? :wink:

What if it's too complicated to draw by hand, or I'm unable to recognize the function?
 
  • #4
not going to happen …

it'll always be f(y) ≤ x ≤ g(y) and a ≤ y ≤ b :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5
tiny-tim said:
not going to happen …

it'll always be f(y) ≤ x ≤ g(y) and a ≤ y ≤ b :wink:

I'm unable to recognize the function rather often. For example,

[itex] \int_0^1 \int_0^{\sqrt{(1-x^2)}} e^{-x^2-y^2} dydx [/itex]
 
  • #6
tolove said:
I'm unable to recognize the function rather often. For example,

[itex] \int_0^1 \int_0^{\sqrt{(1-x^2)}} e^{-x^2-y^2} dydx [/itex]

ok, that's 0 ≤ y ≤ √(1 - x2) ≤ 1

ie 0 ≤ y2 ≤ 1 - x2 ≤ 1,

which becomes … ? :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #7
tiny-tim said:
ok, that's 0 ≤ y ≤ √(1 - x2) ≤ 1

ie 0 ≤ y2 ≤ 1 - x2 ≤ 1,

which becomes … ? :smile:

Alright, I got it! Thank you very much! There wasn't any graphing involved in this, though? It's all shown algebraically with those neat little inequalities. I suppose there are cases where traps are present, however.

r = 0..1, theta=0..Pi/2

Edit: Ahh! When you say graph, you mean the limits, not the actual function being integrated?
 
Last edited:
  • #8
tolove said:
Alright, I got it! Thank you very much! There wasn't any graphing involved in this, though? It's all shown algebraically with those neat little inequalities. I suppose there are cases where traps are present, however.

r = 0..1, theta=0..Pi/2

Edit: Ahh! When you say graph, you mean the limits, not the actual function being integrated?
Yes, the limits of integration. They define the region over which integration is to take place. It's very important to have a good understanding of what this region looks like, especially if you're changing from Cartesian to polar or vice-versa.
 

FAQ: Understanding Limits of Integration: Cartesian or Polar First?

What is Cartesian integration?

Cartesian integration is a method used in calculus to find the area under a curve. It involves dividing the area into small rectangles and adding up their individual areas to approximate the total area.

What is polar integration?

Polar integration is a method used in calculus to find the area under a curve in polar coordinates. It involves dividing the area into sectors and adding up their individual areas to approximate the total area.

What is the difference between Cartesian and polar integration?

The main difference between Cartesian and polar integration is the coordinate system used. Cartesian integration uses x and y coordinates, while polar integration uses radius and angle measurements. Additionally, the formulas and methods for finding the area differ between the two methods.

When is it more appropriate to use Cartesian integration?

Cartesian integration is more appropriate to use when the curve being integrated is in the form of a function y = f(x). It is also easier to visualize and calculate the area using Cartesian coordinates in this case.

When is it more appropriate to use polar integration?

Polar integration is more appropriate to use when the curve being integrated is in polar form, such as r = f(θ). It is also useful for finding the area of shapes with polar symmetry, such as circles or spirals.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top