Understanding the Lorentz Transformation: Unpacking the Mathematical Steps

In summary, the (1-(v^2/c^2)) term in the equation for the Lorentz Transformation comes from factoring and manipulating the given equations, specifically using the relationship v = bc/a. This explanation does not involve the concept of relativity and is based purely on mathematical principles.
  • #1
dperez3894
8
0
I don't know which math forum to put this in but perhaps someone here could help out.

I want to figure out the mathematics behind the Lorentz Transformation so I can understand it better. I've got a copy of Einstein's Relativity which was reprinted by Three Rivers Press a few years ago.

In the Appendix there's a section on the Lorentz Transformation and I've hit a wall in figuring out the steps between the equations.

On page 133 they have the following equation sets;

(5)
x' = ax - bct
ct' = act - bx

(6)

v = bc/a

On page 134 it gave an example where if a snapshot was taken from K'(t'=0) and t was removed from equations (5) where;

x' = ax - bc
0 = ac - bx

and taking into account expression (6), the following equation was derived;

x' = a(1-(v^2/c^2))x

Where did the (1-(v^2/c^2)) come from?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'll attempt a purely mathematical explanation, I don't know **** about relativity ;)

Factor out the a and the x, and use the fact that bc/a = v.

[tex]x' = ax - bc = a(x - \frac{bc}{a}) = a(x - v) = ax(1 - \frac{v}{x})[/tex].

But [tex]0 = ac - bx[/tex] was given, so [tex]bx = ac[/tex], so [tex]x = \frac{ac}{b}[/tex]. Substituting into the previous equation yields

[tex]x' = ax(1 - \frac{v}{ac/b}) = ax(1 - \frac{bv}{ac}) = ax(1 - \frac{b}{a} \cdot \frac{v}{c})[/tex].

But [tex]v = bc/a[/tex] (given), so [tex]\frac{b}{a} = \frac{v}{c}[/tex]. Thus

[tex]x' = ax(1 - \frac{v}{c} \cdot \frac{v}{c}) = ax(1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2})[/tex].
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Here's a derivation that has nothing to do with relativity:

A man is swimming in a river. The man can swim at "c" m/s in still water and the river is flowing at "v" m/s.

First the man swims a distance d downstream and then back up again. Of course, down stream his speed, relative to the shore, is v+c so it takes him time t<sub>1</sub>= d/(v+c) rto do that. Swimming back up stream his speed, still relative to the shore, is c- v so it takes him t<sub>2</sub> = d/(c-v) to do that:total time downstream and back, d/(c+v)+ d/(c-v)= (d(c-v)+ d(c+v))/((c-v)(c+v))= 2dc(c<sup>2</sup>- v<sup>2</sup>).

Now, he swims across the river a distance d' and back again. Drawing a vector diagram, it should be clear that he has to angle upstream slightly so that there is a right triangle with length ct (what he would swim if there were no current), vertical leg vt (how the current pushes him downstream), and horiontal leg (across the river) d'. That is: c<sup>2<sup>t<sup>2</sup>= v<sup>2</sup>+ d'<sup>2</sup>. Solving for t, t<sup>2<sup>= d'<sup>2</sup>/(c<sup>2</sup>- v<sup>2</sup>) and t= [itex]\frac{d'}{\sqrt{c^2- v^2}}[/itex].
That's one way: doing exactly the same thing back, the total time to swim out and back is [itex]\frac{2d'}{\sqrt{c^2- v^2}}[/itex].

Now suppose he finds that the two times are the same. What is the relationship between d and d'?

We have t= [itex]\frac{2dc}{c^2-v^2}= \frac{2d'}{\sqrt{c^2- v^2}}[/itex]

That gives
d= [itex]\frac{d' \sqrt{c^2- v^2}}{c}[/itex]
= [itex]d' \sqrt{1- (v/c)^2}[/itex].

Do you see how that is connected to the Michaelson-Morley experiment?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Muzza said:
I'll attempt a purely mathematical explanation, I don't know **** about relativity ;)

Factor out the a and the x, and use the fact that bc/a = v.

[tex]x' = ax - bc = a(x - \frac{bc}{a}) = a(x - v) = ax(1 - \frac{v}{x})[/tex].

But [tex]0 = ac - bx[/tex] was given, so [tex]bx = ac[/tex], so [tex]x = \frac{ac}{b}[/tex]. Substituting into the previous equation yields

[tex]x' = ax(1 - \frac{v}{ac/b}) = ax(1 - \frac{bv}{ac}) = ax(1 - \frac{b}{a} \cdot \frac{v}{c})[/tex].

But [tex]v = bc/a[/tex] (given), so [tex]\frac{b}{a} = \frac{v}{c}[/tex]. Thus

[tex]x' = ax(1 - \frac{v}{c} \cdot \frac{v}{c}) = ax(1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2})[/tex].

Thanks. It's been quite a while since I've factored equations.
 

FAQ: Understanding the Lorentz Transformation: Unpacking the Mathematical Steps

What is the Lorentz Transformation math?

The Lorentz Transformation math, also known as the Lorentz transformation equations, are a set of mathematical equations that describe how space and time coordinates change between two reference frames that are moving at a constant velocity relative to each other. These equations were developed by Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz in the late 19th century and later refined by Albert Einstein in his theory of special relativity.

What is the purpose of the Lorentz Transformation math?

The Lorentz Transformation math is used to calculate the differences in space and time measurements between two frames of reference that are moving at different velocities. It allows for the prediction of how objects and events will appear to observers in different reference frames, and is essential for understanding the effects of special relativity, such as time dilation and length contraction.

What are the main equations involved in the Lorentz Transformation math?

The main equations involved in the Lorentz Transformation math are the equations for time dilation, length contraction, and velocity addition. These are given by t' = γ(t - vx/c²), L' = L/γ, and u' = (u - v)/(1 - uv/c²), respectively. In these equations, t and t' represent time measurements in the two reference frames, L and L' represent lengths, v and u represent velocities, c is the speed of light, and γ is the Lorentz factor.

How is the Lorentz Transformation math applied in real-world scenarios?

The Lorentz Transformation math is used in a variety of real-world scenarios, particularly in physics and astronomy. For example, it is used in particle accelerators to calculate the effects of relativistic speeds on subatomic particles. It is also used in GPS technology to account for the time dilation effects of satellites orbiting Earth. Additionally, the Lorentz Transformation is crucial for understanding the behavior of light, such as in the phenomenon of redshift and the prediction of the speed of light being constant in all reference frames.

Are there any limitations or criticisms of the Lorentz Transformation math?

While the Lorentz Transformation math has been proven to accurately describe the effects of special relativity, some physicists argue that it is limited in its applicability to scenarios involving acceleration or non-inertial frames of reference. There are also ongoing debates about the philosophical implications of the Lorentz Transformation and whether it is the most accurate way to describe the relationship between space and time. However, for most practical purposes, the Lorentz Transformation remains a highly useful and well-supported mathematical tool.

Similar threads

Replies
101
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top