Uniform Convergence of fn(x) for x in (1, infinity)

In summary, the given sequence of functions f_n(x) = \frac{n}{x^n} converges to f(x) = 0 for all x > 1. The convergence is not uniform as the limit of f_n(1+1/n) is not a pointwise limit. The uniform convergence occurs for x > 1.
  • #1
hamsterman
74
0
What is the value of
[itex]\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sup \left\{\frac{n}{x^n}:x\in\left( 1; \infty\right)\right\}[/itex]
It seems to be 0, but what if [itex]x = 1+\frac{1}{n}[/itex]? In that case [itex]x^n = e[/itex] and the above limit is then [itex]+\infty[/itex], isn't it? I have a feeling I'm somehow wrong, but if I'm not, for what x is the above limit equal to 0 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
function goes to 0 when x>1

thats the answer.
 
  • #3
Sorry, my first post was wrong, this is the edit. I think that if you do that, then x = 1, and is no longer satisfying the bounds of being between 1 and infinity.
 
  • #4
@EternityMech, would you elaborate? Is [itex]1+\frac{1}{n} = 1[/itex]? I'm sure it isn't because raising both sides to the power of n gives [itex]e = 1[/itex]
 
  • #5
hamsterman said:
@EternityMech, would you elaborate? Is [itex]1+\frac{1}{n} = 1[/itex]? I'm sure it isn't because raising both sides to the power of n gives [itex]e = 1[/itex]

Yes I realized my error and changed my post.

EDIT: ooh and it looks like you realized that i realized my error and you also changed your post. well...thats good that this is all sorted out.
 
  • #6
hamsterman said:
What is the value of
[itex]\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sup \left\{\frac{n}{x^n}:x\in\left( 1; \infty\right)\right\}[/itex]
It seems to be 0, but what if [itex]x = 1+\frac{1}{n}[/itex]? In that case [itex]x^n = e[/itex] and the above limit is then [itex]+\infty[/itex], isn't it? I have a feeling I'm somehow wrong, but if I'm not, for what x is the above limit equal to 0 ?
its a lim sup of sequence of numbers or sequence of sets ? if numbers show me what are a1,a2,a3,...and if sets show what are X1,X2,X3,...
 
  • #7
First of all, x is fixed. You can not replace it by a terms that depends on n, if you do, you change the sequence. What the sequence is completely determined by how n appears in it.

This is limsup so first you have to find supremum over m>n and then take the limit. I am assuming you are defining the supremum as follows (it may change but the general convention is this)

[itex]\sup_{m>n} \left\{\frac{m}{x^m}:x\in\left( 1; \infty\right)\right\}[/itex]

However in our case the terms approach to zero (divide n+1th element by the nth element and take the limit, you will see that it is less than 1 so using theorems from calculus you can say that the limit exists and is zero). So when your sequence has a limit, liminf and limsup are equal to it and to each other (for instance on the contrary consider a sequence of points which converge to points on a sine graph, they do not have a limit but their limsup and liminf is 1 and -1). Thus the answer is zero.

More explicitly you can show that after a certain value of n (when we pass over the maximum of [itex]\frac{m}{x^m}[/itex]) then
[itex]sup_{m>n} \frac{m}{x^m} = \frac{n+1}{x^{n+1}} [/itex] and so taking the limit gives you the result.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
I guess I should add some context. I'm given [itex]f_n(x)=\frac{n}{x^n}[/itex]. I need to analyze the convergence of this sequence of functions for all [itex]x > 1[/itex]. First I see that [itex]f(x) = \lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty} \frac{n}{x^n} = 0[/itex]. I then need to check whether [itex]\forall\epsilon>0, \exists N,\forall n > N, \forall x: |f-f_n|(x) < \epsilon[/itex] to know if the convergence is uniform. I do that using the expression in my first post. I'm sure that [itex]x[/itex] can be a function of [itex]n[/itex] because [itex]\forall x[/itex] goes after [itex]\exists N[/itex].

@vrmuth, I'm not sure how to define it. I guess it's a set of functions of n. Either way, the set is not discrete.
 
  • #9
well you should definitely distinguish between sequences of functions and sequences of points :) your first post looks more like a limit of sequence of points rather than functions. Still it is a bit strange to define x interms of n since it is just a free parameter no?

The limit fn(1+n) as n goes to infinity is not a point-wise limit but you just select the value of each fn at the point 1+n and look whether if that has a limit. I can't see what that would have to do with this question since we want to look at pointwise limits or uniform limit.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
What I can't distinguish between is functions, numbers and sets. A function because it has an argument n, a number if n is a constant and a set if n is any natural number.

If limit fn(1+1/n) is not a pointwise limit, I assume that this sequence does not converge uniformly. In that case, my question is, for what x does it converge uniformly?
 

FAQ: Uniform Convergence of fn(x) for x in (1, infinity)

What is a limit in mathematics?

A limit in mathematics refers to the value that a function or sequence approaches as the input or index approaches a specific value. It is used to describe the behavior of a function at a certain point or as the input/output values get closer and closer to a certain value.

How do I calculate a limit?

To calculate a limit, you need to use the limit laws and properties, such as the sum, difference, product, and quotient laws. You also need to understand the concept of one-sided limits, where you approach the limit from either the left or the right side. Additionally, you can use techniques such as substitution, factoring, and rationalization to evaluate limits.

What is the difference between a limit and continuity?

A limit and continuity are closely related concepts in mathematics, but they are not the same. A limit describes the behavior of a function at a specific point, whereas continuity describes the behavior of a function over an interval. In other words, a function is continuous at a point if the limit of the function at that point exists and is equal to the function's value at that point.

Why is understanding limits important in calculus?

Limits are an essential concept in calculus because they allow us to define and analyze the behavior of functions at specific points. They are used to determine the derivative and integral of a function, which are fundamental concepts in calculus. Understanding limits also helps in solving real-world problems and modeling various phenomena in science and engineering.

Is there a limit calculator I can use to solve limits?

Yes, there are many limit calculators available online that can help you solve limits. However, it is essential to understand the concept and different techniques for calculating limits manually before relying on a calculator. Additionally, calculators may not always give accurate results, so it is best to use them as a tool to check your work rather than relying on them entirely.

Back
Top