Volume of a Solid: Washers/Disks/Shells

In summary, the volume of a solid obtained by rotating the region enclosed by x=0, y=1, x=y^5 about the line y=1 can be computed using the method of disks or washers.
  • #1
PaulingL
8
0

Homework Statement


The volume of a solid obtained by rotating the region enclosed by
x=0, y=1, x=y^5 about the line y=1
can be computed using the method of disks or washers via an integral.

Homework Equations


V= ∏[itex]\int[/itex](R^2-r^2)dx

The Attempt at a Solution


I have attempted this problem many times, and have come up with a lot of different approaches. When I drew this out, it seemed like I needed to calculate the entire cylinder, and then subtract the 'bowl' from the inside.

This gave me V= ∏[itex]\int[/itex](1^2-(1-(x^(1/5)))^2)

I know that it needs to be integrated with respect to x (dx) and that the limits of integration are from 0 to 1 because I got those correct.

I have also thought of the problem as a simple disk problem using V=∏[itex]\int[/itex](x^(1/5))^2 to no avail.

I would really appreciate any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Couple of quick questions:

* is ∏ supposed to be pi? Because the ∏ symbol is actually the product operator (similar to Ʃ, but with multiplication instead of addition).

*My understanding is that the approach that you talked about in your attempt at a solution is correct, but... it looks like you may have gotten off into the weeds from that point, because I don't see where you're actually DOING that.
I think that there should be two integrals, with the inner integral being subtracted from the outer integral.
 
  • #3
Yes, I did mean pi, sorry about that.

Thanks for the reply! On "WebWork" (the software my school uses) we are required (for this homework) to report it all as one integral.

I have drawn out the two "interpretations" I had of this problem and took a photo of it. I hope it is clear enough to be able to see.

http://i.imgur.com/3ztYy.jpg

The first, one shown, seems like it actually makes more sense to me now. It seems like y=1 would be the upper function and y=x^(1/5) would be the lower, making it a simple disk problem.

It still should have the same radius as if it were rotated around the x-axis, but that apparently is not the case as I am not getting the correct solution when I enter pi*(x^(1/5))^2*dx as my answer.
 
  • #4
The pic helps, I'm looking at it now...
I know what you mean by "seems like it actually makes more sense to me now", though. That's the way everything has been going for me as well.

Looking over my notes and textbook though, it should be one integral, just... humm...
 
  • #5
Thanks so much for helping me. I have spent far too much time working on this problem!
 
  • #6
Oh!
I think that you need to integrate this horizontally... fairly certain of that, actually.
 
  • #7
It is saying correct for dx and incorrect for dy. I am sure you could do it both ways, but they clearly want me to use dx.
 
  • #8
well... I'm getting [itex]5\pi/6[/itex] as an answer... I think.
(to [itex]\int(\pi x^1/5)dx[/itex] that is.)
 
  • #9
Could you tell me how you did it? I have to enter the integral for the answer.
 
  • #10
well, the pi just goes out in front of the integral. Then you use the power rule for the x to the 1/5th dx, which gives you x^(6/5) divided by 6/5. pi times all of that between 1 and 0 (the 0 side just goes to zero though, so just drop it) = pi((1^(6/5))/6/5). 1 to any exponent is 1, so you're left with pi divided by 6/5, which equals 5pi / 6.
 
  • #11
The integral is not pi(x^(1/5)^2) or pi(x^(1/5))
 
  • #12
humm... wait a second, are you trying to find the shaded area or the white area, in your diagram? I thought that it was the white area, from the problem description you gave in the OP. If it's the shaded area, then... my textbook says that you have to use two integrals (Method of washers). so... I'm confused.
 
  • #13
oh, wait... you can use the Cylindrical Shells method for this...

v=[itex]\int(\pi(outer radius - inner radius))dx[/itex]

Give me a minute to figure it out, though.
 
  • #15
The limits of integration are definitely 0 to 1. (x=0 is given, and x=y^5 intersects y=1 at (1,1)).

Using the cylinders method:
Since we're revolving around the y=1 line, that will be the "inner". so, "inner" f(x)=1.
"Outer" f(x)=x^1/5.

[itex]\int(\pi (x^(1/5))^2 - (1)^2) dx = \int(\pi x^(2/5) - 1) dx = \pi-1 \int( x^(2/5)) dx = \pi-1((x^(7/5))/(7/5))[/itex]
going from 1 to 0 (zero just goes away, which makes things easier),
1 to an exponent is 1, so:
[itex](\pi-1)/(7/5) = (5\pi-1)/7[/itex]

?
 
  • #16
...but, I see that you can't use cylinders there.
:frown:
 
  • #17
did you try pi times x to the 2/5th? sometimes those things don't like it when you use two expoenets like: (x^1/5)^2
Maybe it wants you to actually square the exponent?

Looks like all they want you to do is set the integral up, which should be pi r^2. And, since the region enclosed by those three lines is y=x^1/5 (the white area in your drawing), we're definitely on the right track here.
 
  • #18
Hmm. I have tried many combinations (I am on attempt 37), to no avail. I have tried (x^(2/5)) as well.
 

FAQ: Volume of a Solid: Washers/Disks/Shells

What is the formula for finding the volume of a solid using washers?

The formula for finding the volume of a solid using washers is V = π∫(R^2 - r^2)dx, where R is the outer radius, r is the inner radius, and dx is the thickness of the washers.

How do I determine the limits of integration when using disks to find the volume of a solid?

The limits of integration when using disks to find the volume of a solid are determined by the cross section of the solid. The lower limit will be the x-coordinate of the starting point of the cross section, and the upper limit will be the x-coordinate of the ending point of the cross section.

Can the method of disks/washers be used to find the volume of any solid?

No, the method of disks/washers can only be used to find the volume of solids with circular cross sections. If the cross section is not circular, a different method, such as the method of cylindrical shells, must be used.

What is the difference between using disks and washers to find the volume of a solid?

The difference between using disks and washers to find the volume of a solid is that disks are used when the cross section of the solid is perpendicular to the axis of rotation, while washers are used when the cross section is parallel to the axis of rotation.

Can the method of cylindrical shells be used for solids with non-circular cross sections?

Yes, the method of cylindrical shells can be used for solids with non-circular cross sections. This method involves integrating the circumference of the shell instead of the area of a disk or washer.

Back
Top