Was Judge Weinstein's Dismissal of the Agent Orange Suit Justified?

  • News
  • Thread starter kat
  • Start date
In summary, Judge Weinstein dismissed the Vietnamese victims' class action suit against the U.S. for the effects of Agent Orange due to the argument that the random poisoning of a large number of people does not fit into any of the categories of crimes against humanity. Despite the coverup and denial by the government and chemical companies, Judge Weinstein concluded that poisoning with Agent Orange did not fall under the categories of genocide, enslavement, deportation, torture, or forced pregnancy. This was a surprising ruling considering the potential harm and coverup of the use of Agent Orange during the Vietnam War.
  • #1
kat
42
0
Interesting ruling on the Class action Suite by vietnamese victims of Agent Orange

Why Judge Weinstein Dismissed VAVAO's Agent Orange ATCA Suit

So why, in the end, did Judge Weinstein dismiss the Agent Orange suit - having rejected all these possible arguments for dismissal?

The reason he gave was simple: The random poisoning of a large number of people, if it is a side-effect of the deforestation of a battleground, is neither a crime against humanity, nor a violation of any treaty to which the U.S. was a signatory at the time the poisoning occurred.

Customary international law, Judge Weinstein reasoned, requires crimes against humanity to fit into one of a number of relatively narrow categories: genocide, enslavement, deportation or forcible transfer of population, torture, or forced pregnancy. But poisoning with Agent Orange (at least as it was done by the U.S.), he concluded, fit none of these categories.


http://writ.news.findlaw.com/sebok/20050321.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Like it was yesterday

I've always felt that the coverup and denial by our government and the chemical companies was a war-crime it itself. A lot of birth defects and deaths should of been treated and studied but alas our government did yet another coverup.
I remember in 1970, about 6am (still dark) walking to pick up messages with a fellow soldier as a truck drove by spraying. My friend backed up to avoid the spray and said "you should back up because that stuff may be toxic or something". I chose not to back up because there could be mines planted in the ground and I figured the toxins sprayed would be slower to act and the lesser of two evils.
A decade later the VA hospital told me that nothing was sprayed in my area of Nam and that Agent Orange wasn't bad anyway. (I felt like finding some and throwing it on the doctor and seeing if she still felt that way).
By the way, I have a few photos of a fence line in that area on my website homepage at the bottom. It is probably slow to load but you can tell that not much grew there even though the area was a rainy area that normally had a lot of plant growth. Gil of http://www.surrealcity.com
 
  • #3



The dismissal of the Agent Orange case is certainly an interesting ruling, and one that has sparked much debate and discussion. While it may seem like a disappointing outcome for the Vietnamese victims, there are valid reasons for Judge Weinstein's decision. As the article points out, the use of Agent Orange was not considered a crime against humanity or a violation of any treaty at the time it occurred. This is an important factor to consider in the context of the case.

Furthermore, Judge Weinstein's reasoning that the poisoning with Agent Orange did not fit into any of the categories of crimes against humanity is also worth considering. While it may have had devastating effects on the victims, the use of Agent Orange was not specifically intended to target a certain group of people based on their race, ethnicity, or religion - which is often a defining characteristic of crimes against humanity.

It is also important to note that the use of Agent Orange was a side-effect of deforestation, rather than a deliberate act of chemical warfare. This further complicates the issue and makes it difficult to classify it as a crime against humanity.

Overall, while the dismissal of the case may be disappointing for the Vietnamese victims, it is important to consider the legal complexities involved and the limitations of international law in this situation. It is also worth noting that this ruling does not diminish the suffering and impact that Agent Orange had on the victims and their families.
 

FAQ: Was Judge Weinstein's Dismissal of the Agent Orange Suit Justified?

What is the "Agent Orange case"?

The "Agent Orange case" refers to a series of lawsuits filed by Vietnam War veterans against the chemical companies responsible for manufacturing and supplying Agent Orange, a herbicide used by the US military during the war. These veterans claimed that exposure to Agent Orange caused them various health issues, including cancer and birth defects in their children.

Why was the "Agent Orange case" dismissed?

The "Agent Orange case" was dismissed because the court found that the chemical companies were immune from liability under the Feres doctrine, which prohibits members of the military from suing the government for injuries sustained during active duty. Additionally, the court also ruled that the companies could not be held responsible for the actions of the military, which ordered the use of Agent Orange during the war.

What evidence was presented in the "Agent Orange case"?

The evidence presented in the "Agent Orange case" included studies and reports linking Agent Orange to various health issues, as well as testimonies from veterans who claimed to have been exposed to the herbicide during their service in Vietnam. However, the court ultimately ruled that this evidence was not enough to hold the chemical companies liable for the veterans' health problems.

Are there any other legal actions being taken regarding Agent Orange?

Yes, there have been other legal actions taken regarding Agent Orange. In 1991, the US government established the Agent Orange Settlement Fund to compensate veterans and their families affected by the herbicide. In 2009, a settlement was reached in a class-action lawsuit against the chemical companies, providing $180 million in compensation to affected veterans.

What are the long-term effects of Agent Orange exposure?

The long-term effects of Agent Orange exposure are still being studied and debated. Some studies have linked exposure to Agent Orange to various health issues, including cancer, diabetes, and birth defects. However, the full extent of its effects is still unknown, and further research is needed to fully understand the long-term consequences of exposure to this chemical.

Back
Top