What are the different equivalence principles and how are they related?

  • Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Equivalence
In summary, the equivalence principle (EP) is a fundamental concept in the study of gravity and has three different versions: the Weak, Einsteinian, and Strong equivalence principles (WEP, EEP, and SEP). The validity of WEP guarantees the validity of EEP, and EEP is supported by empirical evidence such as the Eötvös experiments. However, most metric theories, except for general relativity, predict violations of SEP.
  • #1
ShayanJ
Insights Author
Gold Member
2,810
605
In my studies about equivalence principle,I learned that there are three equivalence principles:Weak,Einsteinian and Strong equivalence principles.I'm just confused with them.Also looks like EEP and SEP can be derived from WEP making them seem superfluous.
Can someone explain clearly?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2001-4/

The WEP and EEP are described in section 2.1, and the SEP is described in 3.1.2.

Section 2.2.1: "Around 1960, Schiff conjectured that this kind of connection was a necessary feature of any self-consistent theory of gravity. More precisely, Schiff’s conjecture states that any complete, self-consistent theory of gravity that embodies WEP necessarily embodies EEP. In other words, the validity of WEP alone guarantees the validity of local Lorentz and position invariance, and thereby of EEP.

If Schiff’s conjecture is correct, then Eötvös experiments may be seen as the direct empirical foundation for EEP, hence for the interpretation of gravity as a curved-spacetime phenomenon. Of course, a rigorous proof of such a conjecture is impossible (indeed, some special counter-examples are known [204, 194, 62]), yet a number of powerful “plausibility” arguments can be formulated."

Section 3.1.2: "Empirically it has been found that almost every metric theory other than GR introduces auxiliary gravitational fields, either dynamical or prior geometric, and thus predicts violations of SEP at some level (here we ignore quantum-theory inspired modifications to GR involving “R2” terms). The one exception is Nordström’s 1913 conformally-flat scalar theory [195], which can be written purely in terms of the metric; the theory satisfies SEP, but unfortunately violates experiment by predicting no deflection of light. General relativity seems to be the only viable metric theory that embodies SEP completely. In Section 3.6, we shall discuss experimental evidence for the validity of SEP."
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FAQ: What are the different equivalence principles and how are they related?

What is the principle of equivalence?

The principle of equivalence is a fundamental concept in physics that states that there is no way to distinguish between the effects of gravity and the effects of acceleration. In other words, the laws of physics and the resulting observations are the same for an observer in a uniform gravitational field as they are for an observer in an accelerated frame of reference.

How was the principle of equivalence first proposed?

The principle of equivalence was first proposed by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. He realized that the effects of gravity could be described by curved spacetime, and that this curvature could also be produced by acceleration. This led to the idea of the equivalence between gravity and acceleration.

What is the significance of the principle of equivalence?

The principle of equivalence has significant implications for our understanding of gravity and the fabric of spacetime. It has been confirmed by numerous experiments and is a cornerstone of modern physics. It also plays a crucial role in the development of technologies such as GPS and in our understanding of the universe at large scales.

How does the principle of equivalence relate to the concept of mass?

The principle of equivalence also has implications for the concept of mass. According to Einstein's theory of general relativity, mass and energy are equivalent, and mass can be thought of as a measure of the curvature of spacetime. This means that the more mass an object has, the more it will bend the fabric of spacetime around it, resulting in a stronger gravitational force.

Are there any exceptions to the principle of equivalence?

While the principle of equivalence holds true in most cases, there are some exceptions. For example, at very small scales, such as in the quantum world, the effects of gravity and acceleration can be distinguished. Additionally, in extreme conditions such as near a black hole, the principle of equivalence may break down. However, in everyday situations, the principle of equivalence is a highly accurate and useful concept.

Back
Top