- #1
pamparana
- 128
- 0
Hello everyone,
I have a question about nomenclature and it may be a bit more than simple nomenclature as I am not quite sure I understand it:
So, I am reading a paper and going through it very slowly as it is quite intense. But one of the line is as follows:
Suppose the transformation s maps a point p to the point s(p). Let u = s - I be the displacement field associated with the transformation s.
I am confused as to what s - I represents. The subtracting of the identity from a transformation seems strange to me.
I always thought the displacement field can be simply represented for each particle by associating a vector with each particle...
I hope someone can clarify this doubt for me.
Many thanks,
Luc
I have a question about nomenclature and it may be a bit more than simple nomenclature as I am not quite sure I understand it:
So, I am reading a paper and going through it very slowly as it is quite intense. But one of the line is as follows:
Suppose the transformation s maps a point p to the point s(p). Let u = s - I be the displacement field associated with the transformation s.
I am confused as to what s - I represents. The subtracting of the identity from a transformation seems strange to me.
I always thought the displacement field can be simply represented for each particle by associating a vector with each particle...
I hope someone can clarify this doubt for me.
Many thanks,
Luc